Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FM123

(10,053 posts)
Fri Oct 25, 2019, 09:03 AM Oct 2019

(Elie Mystal) Don't Count the Senate Out on Impeachment

(TheNation) To convict Trump on impeachment charges, 20 GOP senators will need to break ranks. Here’s how that can happen.

Democrats in the House of Representatives will eventually get around to filing impeachment charges against President Donald Trump. Ukraine envoy Bill Taylor has laid out the quid pro quo that Trump and Rudolph Giuliani orchestrated to pressure Ukraine into investigating Trump’s political rivals. We’re now in an episode of Columbo (Google it, kids). In the first scene we’ve been shown the crime and the culprit; now we’re just watching to see when everybody else figures it out.

But has anybody tried? Has anybody rattled the cages of these elected officials? Do the American people even know which cages to rattle?

snip

Still, despite what fatalistic Democrats and pundits tell you, a conviction in the Senate is not hopeless. The Daily Caller, a conservative website I only check when I want to feel morally and intellectually superior to others, claims to have done a poll of all 53 Republican senators. They found that only seven of them dismissed impeachment outright—and many of those seven staked their dismissals on process concerns, which will be hard to stick to after all the evidence is laid bare during a televised Senate trial. All of this suggests that there is a lot of room to move the Republican caucus.

snip

Towards that end, I have divided the Republican Senate into four groups.
GROUP A: THE RETIRING OR UP FOR REELECTION. 23 people who will have to vote on whether to convict an obviously corrupt president and then face the voters.

GROUP B: REPUBLICANS WITH AN ALLEGED CONSCIENCE. Don’t get me wrong, I think all of these people, with the exception of Murkowski, are bald-faced hypocrites. These 10 ten people damn well know that extorting a foreign government to investigate a political rival in exchange for weapons to fight Russia warrants removal from office.

GROUP C: THE ONES WHO KNOW THE VOTERS WILL NEVER FORGET. These senators are not up for reelection in 2020. But there’s no reasonable universe where these people should be able to acquit Trump and then hang onto their jobs when their election cycle is up.

GROUP D: AT LEAST WE TRIED. These people are not going to vote to convict the president. But let’s do the math the other way. Instead of counting to 20 Republicans as I have been doing, let’s try to count to the 34 Republicans needed to acquit the president. This “at least we tried” group represents 17 votes, half the needed number. Scroll back up through the previous groups. Are you sure that Trump has 17 additional votes?

Trump’s entire defense rests on his belief that there aren’t 20 Republicans with the courage to cross him. What if he’s wrong?
https://www.thenation.com/article/impeachment-senate-republicans/

(LONG article so I snipped & shortened best I could)

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(Elie Mystal) Don't Count the Senate Out on Impeachment (Original Post) FM123 Oct 2019 OP
Don't forget the no show option. greymattermom Oct 2019 #1
Yes, you are so right! FM123 Oct 2019 #2
It would be truly surreal to convict and remove Trump with only 51 senators present Fiendish Thingy Oct 2019 #4
When the consequences of acquitting Trump seem greater than removing him, Fiendish Thingy Oct 2019 #3

FM123

(10,053 posts)
2. Yes, you are so right!
Fri Oct 25, 2019, 09:09 AM
Oct 2019

According to Laurence Tribe, the Constitution doesn’t indicate that removal from office requires 2/3 of the Senate, it just requires 2/3 of senators present for the proceedings.

So in theory, a vote to convict the president would count as legal with as few as 34 members, not 67, assuming the absolute minimum of 51 participated.

Fiendish Thingy

(15,624 posts)
4. It would be truly surreal to convict and remove Trump with only 51 senators present
Fri Oct 25, 2019, 09:17 AM
Oct 2019

I wouldn't put such a stunt past the GOP, staying away from a vote to put all the political pressure on the Dems, and probably to incite violence by the Trump or die supporters against the "coup".

Fiendish Thingy

(15,624 posts)
3. When the consequences of acquitting Trump seem greater than removing him,
Fri Oct 25, 2019, 09:13 AM
Oct 2019

Moscow Mitch will signal To dump him.

If Moscow Mitch wasn't up for reelection this cycle, the odds against removal would be greater.

With public hearings coming in November, this is why Barr is ramping up his own Witchless With Hunt against the "Deep State". November will be a wild ride, hopefully with much to be thankful for.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»(Elie Mystal) Don't Count...