Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe Can't Keep the Oil
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/10/trump-syria-oil-kurds-graham.htmlWe Cant Keep the Oil
Trumps new rationale for keeping troops in Syria makes no sense.
By Fred Kaplan
Oct 25, 20192:17 PM
President Donald Trumps new rationale for keeping troops in Syriathat theyre needed to protect the nations oilis, not to mince words, preposterous.
First, Syria doesnt even rank among the worlds top 60 oil producers, pumping out only about 0.05 percent as much petroleum as Iraqjust half as much as Cuba, which isnt known as an oil power.
Second, its oil fields arent Americas to protect. They are owned by the Syrian government, with some venture capital provided by China, Russia, and India. No American oil companies are keen to step into the fray. In any case, the cease-fire agreement that Vice President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo signed with Turkeythe deal that Trump has touted so proudlypretty much removes the United States as a political, economic, or military power in the entire area. As Joshua Landis, editor of the Syria Comment website, notes, the Russians and Turks will in effect control the oil.
Third, the new rationaleeven if it had meritcontradicts Trumps claim that his abandonment of the Kurds in northern Syria was the first step of a broader pullout from the endless wars of the Middle East. He had already reversed that policy a few days later, when he announced the deployment of 1,800 troops to Saudi Arabia, saying that the Saudis would pay for their expenses in full, as if that meant the U.S. government wouldnt be involved in the mission. (Everything to Trump is a monetary transaction; in this case, he was basically declaring the U.S. military to be a mercenary force.) Then the Pentagon announced that the troops withdrawn from Syria wont be coming home; rather, theyll redeploy to western Iraq, at least for a while. And now, Trump is saying that some of the troops will stay in Syria toonot to protect the Kurds or to keep ISIS from recovering territory or to help stabilize that corner of an incendiary region, but to preserve oil.
Fourth, as a result, he has to reinforce the notion that the United States is a rapacious imperial powerand a feckless one at that, since the oil, for which hes willing to send troops to fight and die, doesnt belong to America in the first place.
snip//
Graham, Keane, and many others wanted to keep some U.S. troops in Syria. Trump did not. So they made up a phony argument to get him to change his mind. It worked. Now even Secretary of Defense Mark Esper is going along with the game. At some point, will Trump ask how the campaign to defend the oil fields is going? Esper, Graham, Keane, and the others probably assume he wont. They know, from experience, that, ultimately, he doesnt care.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 914 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We Can't Keep the Oil (Original Post)
babylonsister
Oct 2019
OP
Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)1. This is just another episode of the Celebrity A-hole President
There's no way this is real, because it simply isn't possible for the USA to be run by a naked emperor and ministers boasting of his clothes.
And his very large hands.
magicarpet
(14,155 posts)2. trDump said,...
We cant keep the oil ?
Cheney said we could !
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)3. The US is a subsidiarary of Russia. If Putin wants US troops to secure the oil, then that's that.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)4. Yep, we equals him and Putin.
former9thward
(32,023 posts)5. There is NO oil.
People seem to think every country in the Middle East has oil. They don't.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)6. "The Kurdistan region is oil rich."
former9thward
(32,023 posts)7. No it is not.
And the U.S. which is the world's largest oil producer and Russia which is the world's 3rd largest oil producer has NO need of the minuscule amount of oil in Syria.