Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 985 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wow! Rachel Maddow is doing Farrow's piece on Weinstein. nt (Original Post)
LiberalFighter
Oct 2019
OP
Top corporate execs in this position are dangerous, if they can be. However,
empedocles
Oct 2019
#10
elleng
(131,016 posts)1. while noting the amount of consternation caused 'within this building.'
empedocles
(15,751 posts)5. Rachel noted organizational responses, like NBC News, no names, smart.
Ronan can fill in the titles and names.
Gothmog
(145,413 posts)8. Farrow is giving Rachel some well deserved praise
BumRushDaShow
(129,197 posts)2. Yeah and she is interestingly trashing her parent company too.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)3. You've used almost the exact words
I was going to use for an OP just now.
This is a "wow".
Gothmog
(145,413 posts)9. For this thread
eleny
(46,166 posts)4. And he's there for an interview after the break
Gothmog
(145,413 posts)6. This was a great report but I am worried that Rachel may piss off NBC big wigs
Gothmog
(145,413 posts)7. Things don't change without a hell of a lot of pressure.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)10. Top corporate execs in this position are dangerous, if they can be. However,
The corporate boards, if not too many of the individual members are in on the sex 'benefits', may curb the execs - with an outside, independent, investigation. [Rachel, of course, raised this option, which she noted has been avoided by the execs . . . so far].
BumRushDaShow
(129,197 posts)11. Looks like what she did made the NYT
Rachel Maddow Confronts Her NBC News Bosses Live, on the Air
(pic from 2017)
By John Koblin and Michael M. Grynbaum
Published Oct. 25, 2019
Updated Oct. 26, 2019, 1:48 a.m. ET
The MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow publicly confronted the leadership of her own network on Friday night, declaring live on air that she and other NBC News employees had deep concerns about whether the organization had stymied Ronan Farrows reporting on the movie mogul Harvey Weinstein.
In a prime-time monologue, Ms. Maddow questioned why NBC News executives had not invited an independent investigation of the Weinstein episode or the workplace behavior of Matt Lauer, the former Today show anchor who was fired in 2017 after a colleague accused him of sexual misconduct. Ive been through a lot of ups and downs in this company since Ive been here, Ms. Maddow said. It would be impossible for me to overstate the amount of consternation inside the building around this issue. Ms. Maddow also revealed that NBCUniversal, the networks parent company, had agreed to release NBC News employees from contractual clauses that could prevent them from speaking openly about sexual harassment they may have experienced at the network.
Ms. Maddow interviewed Mr. Farrow on her show itself a surprise booking considering her bosses have been at war with him since the publication of his new book, Catch and Kill, in which he asserts that NBC executives blocked his reporting on Mr. Weinsteins brutal treatment of women. Rich McHugh, Mr. Farrows producer at NBC, said in an interview with The New York Times last year that their reporting efforts were blocked. He made that claim again in a detailed first-person article published by Vanity Fair two weeks ago.
NBC News has strenuously denied any suggestion that it got in the way of Mr. Farrows investigation of the accusations against Mr. Weinstein, saying that his work was not fit for broadcast at the time he left the network in August 2017. Mr. Farrow later published his findings in articles for The New Yorker, the first of which was published in October 2017. The magazine ended up sharing a Pulitzer Prize in the public service category with The New York Times thanks to Mr. Farrows articles. NBC has maintained that his published work was substantially different from what he had when he was still at the network.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/25/business/rachel-maddow-ronan-farrow-nbc.html
(pic from 2017)
By John Koblin and Michael M. Grynbaum
Published Oct. 25, 2019
Updated Oct. 26, 2019, 1:48 a.m. ET
The MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow publicly confronted the leadership of her own network on Friday night, declaring live on air that she and other NBC News employees had deep concerns about whether the organization had stymied Ronan Farrows reporting on the movie mogul Harvey Weinstein.
In a prime-time monologue, Ms. Maddow questioned why NBC News executives had not invited an independent investigation of the Weinstein episode or the workplace behavior of Matt Lauer, the former Today show anchor who was fired in 2017 after a colleague accused him of sexual misconduct. Ive been through a lot of ups and downs in this company since Ive been here, Ms. Maddow said. It would be impossible for me to overstate the amount of consternation inside the building around this issue. Ms. Maddow also revealed that NBCUniversal, the networks parent company, had agreed to release NBC News employees from contractual clauses that could prevent them from speaking openly about sexual harassment they may have experienced at the network.
Ms. Maddow interviewed Mr. Farrow on her show itself a surprise booking considering her bosses have been at war with him since the publication of his new book, Catch and Kill, in which he asserts that NBC executives blocked his reporting on Mr. Weinsteins brutal treatment of women. Rich McHugh, Mr. Farrows producer at NBC, said in an interview with The New York Times last year that their reporting efforts were blocked. He made that claim again in a detailed first-person article published by Vanity Fair two weeks ago.
NBC News has strenuously denied any suggestion that it got in the way of Mr. Farrows investigation of the accusations against Mr. Weinstein, saying that his work was not fit for broadcast at the time he left the network in August 2017. Mr. Farrow later published his findings in articles for The New Yorker, the first of which was published in October 2017. The magazine ended up sharing a Pulitzer Prize in the public service category with The New York Times thanks to Mr. Farrows articles. NBC has maintained that his published work was substantially different from what he had when he was still at the network.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/25/business/rachel-maddow-ronan-farrow-nbc.html
I know Farrow has been on the book circuit (as she has for her own book) but I haven't had chance to really delve into his reporting and obviously we have seen the results of both the Weinstein and Epstein nightmares.