Hell, I’d be surprised if they’re still on speaking terms at this point.

of her saying she is the one with power. I would think she would know if he wrote it.

I wouldn't be surprised if Dan Coats is involved.

I've also wondered about Gen. Kelly

I don't think

Nothing in th op ed is inconsistent with Bolton

He was there too late.

could be a red herring

their identity.

Was it several people, or was it one? And I don't know Simon & Shuster's track record but I do the Times and have lost all respect for their compliance with the truth

....Anonymous was written by the same person who wrote the New York Times editorial a few months ago saying he and others were the adults in the room who were keeping control over Trump.

it could be anyone but more likely someone there from beginning which leaves few options

....they are doing a terrible job of it...

I'm tired of these opportunistic cowards whispering their tales while hiding behind the curtain.

that if we ever discover who, it will land a blow/weaken (him) he wasn't/isn't expecting. I can't believe it was/is a family member but can you imagine....

I don't trust him or KellyAnne at all. Neither of them are on our side. She's the DT staffer and staunch supporter, he's one of DT's harshest critics. But they are both still Republicans.

They are playing both sides, and will profit greatly when this is over.

The newest version of Carville/Matlin which were also/is an ick?

Carville is a Dem and Matlin a Rep. and each sincere about their differences.

The Conways are both R's and are on the same team. They are playing us.

+1. After listening to Preet Bharara’s interview with a George Conway, I thought I might come away with some kind of respect for Conway but I did not. I think he’s simply a pompous ass who is disappointed with his party’s blind ass kissing cult following of the MF. However, if the MF were just slightly less abhorrent than he is, Conway would be all in. I don’t trust him at all.

The largest book advance of all will be for Kellyanne when she is done with Trump.

She sold herself for money and fame, first with Cruz totally against Trump, and then switched over for more money and fame when Trump looked more favorable in the campaigns.

Her loyalty is for sale.

Was/is it irony when Kellyanne prostituted herself for money for Cruz or when she prostitutes herself for money for Trump?

https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2016/08/19/here-s-how-trump-s-new-campaign-manager-attacked-him-cable-news-pundit/212524

Here’s How Trump’s New Campaign Manager Attacked Him As A Cable News Pundit

Kellyanne Conway when she was pro-Cruz

Though when you are anonymous... you can get away with lying. I'm thinking of Joe Klein, who was outed for Primary Colors... I think he did his best to hide that he was the anonymous author.

her husband's actions. Who knows?

Publicity is what KellyAnne does. She's crunched the numbers and determined a device and plotline to give the Conway name marquee value.

Two years from now they will have a reality show, a trio of bestselling books, TV talk show appearances, maybe a movie cameo.

Same house together.