General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBut seriously....isn't there anything that Pelosi and Schiff can do about Nunes
and his "assistant" leaking the whistleblower's name? I just don't get this...even if he's a congress member (or member of his staff) how are they allowed to get away with this without at least some kind of censure (whatever that would do) or at best, being kicked off the committee? Are they really that untouchable?
mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)Then it should be a crime to our them.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Guess who does?
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)Barr didn't even think the WB's report was worthy of investigation (EDIT: Tried to bury it!); therefore, he has a conflict of interest and should recuse. He won't, but that shouldn't stop us from referring this to the DOJ Ethics Committee.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)tirebiter
(2,539 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)MineralMan
(146,338 posts)It has been done in the past. I say that Speaker Pelosi should begin that process for Nunes, if he actually does cause the whistleblower's name to be made public by one of his own aides.
Expel him with a vote of unanimous consent by the entire House. Nunes is bringing shame on that legislative body.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)A 2/3 vote is required to expel a Member. That's not likely now, but who knows where we'll be in a few months? The trash heap of history could start piling up sooner than we think.