Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,084 posts)
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 10:32 AM Sep 2012

Samsung Tokyo Win Shows U.S. Jury Verdicts Don’t Sway Judges


(Bloomberg) Samsung Electronics Co. (005930)’s victory over Apple Inc. (AAPL) in a Tokyo court shows that global judges won’t automatically heed a $1.05 billion U.S. jury verdict issued in California a week earlier.

A Tokyo judge ruled Aug. 31 that Samsung smartphones and a tablet computer didn’t infringe an Apple invention for synchronizing music and video data with servers. Apple won the verdict in the U.S. on Aug. 24, with a jury finding that its Suwon, South Korea-based rival infringed six patents for mobile devices.

While the rulings dealt with different patents, courts outside the U.S. tend to discount jury verdicts because they lack legal reasoning typically included in judges’ rulings, lawyers said. The companies are battling over the smartphone market, estimated by Bloomberg Industries to be worth $219 billion last year, with patent lawsuits on four continents.

“German patent judges do take notice of rulings from the U.K. or the Netherlands,” said Peter-Michael Weisse, an intellectual-property attorney at the Wildanger law firm in Germany, where there are at least three hearings and one ruling in Apple-Samsung patent cases this month. “The farther away you get from Europe, the less influence foreign rulings have.” .................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-03/samsung-tokyo-victory-shows-u-s-jury-verdicts-don-t-sway-judges.html



4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
1. This kind of bullshit is holding us all back. It took forever to get a universal cell phone charger
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 12:10 PM
Sep 2012

They finally settled on Samsung's micro-USB connector, but shit - there were over 40 different ones out there and it was all about coercing you into staying with the same connector for whatever phone you had. Shit, a simple laptop charging port would work. Even there, they've got three diameters of plugs and at least 20 voltage/amperage "standards". This shit isn't difficult. It's technology for profit getting in the way of progress in technology. The auto industry figured out LONG ago that standardizing certain things like GAS FILLING pipes would benefit everyone. If they'd concentrate on cooperating, they'd not only save a lot of legal fees but would jointly profit from the rise in usage. Things have changed, dudes (and dudettes). No wonder the shit is so expensive.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
2. Large corporations stifle innovation and competition, that's just a fact.
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 12:19 PM
Sep 2012

Both these general benefits directly harm their bottom lines. As our government has refused to enforce violations of the Sherman Act for over 30 years now, we see the results, we've fallen behind and are falling further every year.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
3. It's always been intentional. Why the FUCK did it take so long to end up with the USB cable?
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 07:19 PM
Sep 2012

I used to have to figure out and solder cables for various parallel printers because they ALWAYS had to find an unused line that needed to be tied into some other line to make the damn fucker work. Lines 2,3,4,5,7 and 20 were all most needed, but they'd just throw in a random 17-23 or something bridge. At least I was good at soldering, but the lines they used never made any sense. The 286 bridge board on the Amiga 500 ran faster and had fewer crashes than an IBM 286.

Patents aren't worth shit anymore. They just jack up prices with all of the perpetual lawsuits over stuff that everyone knows is generic. Lotus sued M$ over Excel. That's funny since Lotus stole 123 from VisiCalc. The guy who filed a patent for those ice-cycle Christmas lights got royally screwed BECAUSE he filed a patent. Within two weeks of filing it, a Chinese firm had them in WalMarts (where else would they be made). He lost big. The guy who invented variable speed wipers spent decades fighting GM and finally won a settlement that was significantly less than what he spent on the fight.

You can't win.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
4. You can go back as far as you want, to any era, any invention, the entity making money from
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 09:37 PM
Sep 2012

the old idea keeps the new idea down for years, sometimes decades.

We really need to change how we think about our world, what is important and where do we want to go?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Samsung Tokyo Win Shows U...