Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 11:27 AM Sep 2012

Tiger Woods tops $100M in earnings

NORTON, Mass. -- Tiger Woods has become the first $100 million man on the PGA Tour.

Woods finished third in the Deutsche Bank Championship on Monday to earn $544,000 and push his career total to $100,350,700. Next on the list is Phil Mickelson -- more than $30 million behind at $66,805,498 after finishing fourth at the TPC Boston.

"The purse increase helps," Woods said after a final-round 66 left him two strokes behind winner Rory McIlroy in the second week of the four-tournament FedEx Cup playoff. "I won fewer tournaments than Sam Snead has, but obviously he was in a different era. It's just that we happened to time it up right and happened to play well when the purses really had a nice spike up."

>

Woods has won 74 tournaments, second all-time, including 38 times with a first prize of $1 million or more. His winnings come out to an average of $362,276.89 for each of his 277 career starts.

http://espn.go.com/golf/story/_/id/8334352/tiger-woods-first-hit-100m-earnings-pga-tour




16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
3. Well, he cheated on his wife
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 12:00 PM
Sep 2012

which is between them.

He's earned that money by his performance on the links. No cheating involved there, as far as I know.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
12. angry today? you know you can't be pissed off at the World
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 01:23 PM
Sep 2012

because your cat knocked the orange juice over in your lap this morning---

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
2. Jack Nicklaus is still better than Tiger.
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 11:58 AM
Sep 2012

after Tiger's dad died, something happened.
Makes one think Earl somehow mindcontrolled Tiger(brainwashed almost), and Tiger lost that extra whatever he had.(focus???)
and never recovered.
Talent is not everything, and Tiger had easier competition than Jack ever had(and Tiger was always in better shape too).
Jack smoked, and was pudgy(now he is probably better fit than he was earlier in life).

Money is meaningless when the greats in the old days played for pennies (and would have played for free).
Same in tennis and bowling and any solo sport

Hell, Mariah Carey can keep getting top 10 records, that surely don't make her Elvis or the Beatles or Elton or anyone else.

 

wilt the stilt

(4,528 posts)
4. Tiger is way better than Nicklaus and I watched them both
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 12:10 PM
Sep 2012

Tiger's winning percentage is way higher. 27% vs 12% and cuts made Nicklaus missed cuts 85, Tiger 9.
There were maybe 6 good golfers in Nicklaus's time. There are far more people playing golf today.
Nicklaus never dominated like Tiger.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
13. that's the point-Tiger was always unopposed(not to mention...
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 02:10 PM
Sep 2012

the other players know that it was in THEIR interest for Tiger to win and win often.


He singlehandedly raised all the prizes from top to bottom, so they made millions by being in 2nd all the way down

I often wonder if "the fix was in" because Tiger was the reason the sponsers paid the million dollar purses.

Jack on the other hand only cared about the majors after a while, and also really only cared about winning.
One reason he never really spent time on the senior tour was he said he beat all the same golfers in their prime, and it didn't "stimulate" him (I don't mean that sexually)LOL

And I would think Gary Player, Lee Trevino, Arnold Palmer when younger and five or six others all were top notch, whereas Tiger was way above all of his competitors.(IMHO there now are 50 others that would all have been considered a step below in the 1960s/1970s).

Sort of like Babe Ruth so early in his career being the all time home run hitter, had someone had 800 homeruns, Ruth might have hit 1000.(Had Willie Mays not had the long years in the army, he might have hit 750).

(and I watched Jack from the start too and a fan of Tiger's but think Jack was better)

and I think Jack's major record will stand, the years are gaining on Tiger.

It's impossible to compare older players as they don't have the newest clubs(which are almost radar like).

But I am sure Jack would have loved to play for those earnings

My kid went to the Bethpage LI NY tourney two weeks ago and watched Tiger play
There is alot of pressure on him and the golf world is counting on him because as said at the top here, his winning increases their earnings.

 

wilt the stilt

(4,528 posts)
16. I was at the U.S. open at the Olympic
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 10:00 PM
Sep 2012

and I was at the PGA last year. There is just more people playing golf now and the players are better. The Europeans are better now. Everyone is better today. The best way to evaluate how good is how dominant someone is in their own era. Babe Ruth is probably the greatest ever because he was so dominant.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
14. Tiger's competition is so much tougher than Jack's
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 02:16 PM
Sep 2012

Many, many more top players now.

Now Jack's ball sucked and that is the truth.

The money does not compare, tho.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
15. Now he is one of 50 good players, Tiger used to be 1 of 1
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 02:21 PM
Sep 2012

no, I disagree because Tiger when he was winning was way above any of the others

Tiger is not being beaten by them, but his mind is beating is beating him
He is not the same and is now rattled (getting older ones nerves never are as young)

but now he is one of 50 instead of then he was one of 1 with nobody able to touch him when he was playing well.

Jack was one of 6 greats, but the best of the six

IMHO, we will never know as Jack and Tiger didn't get a chance to play at the top of Jack's game

They both are great fun to watch though.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
5. tiger probably won't win another major
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 12:12 PM
Sep 2012

He had a good run, but I think its over. His downfall has been pretty epic.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
10. His "downfall" has him tied for the tour lead in victories, near the top of the money list ...
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 12:59 PM
Sep 2012

with a spot locked up on the Ryder Cup team, and running neck-and-neck with McIlroy for PGA Player of the Year. I wouldn't mind experiencing that kind of "epic downfall".

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
6. Once upon a time being a great athlete was its own reward
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 12:12 PM
Sep 2012

Many were well paid but the real measure was their legacy on the field of play. Kids wanted to be able to "do that" and "that" was handle a basketball like Earl the Pearl Monroe or fly and dunk like Dr J.

Decades later we know the names Babe Ruth, Joe Louis, Stein Erickson, Sonja Henning, Jackie Robinson, Jerry West, John Wooden and so many others. I couldn't tell you how much any of those athletes made because it wasn't about money.

In today's "whoever dies with the most money wins" world, the paychecks of pro athletes give cover to the salaries of the outsourcing, greedy, anything-for-a-buck Romney's of the world.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
11. Me Mum
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 01:21 PM
Sep 2012

My mother used to play golf with one of Sam Snead's cousins. My (infinitesimal) connection to the greats of golf.

I myself gave up golf at age 13 after nearly wrapping a club around a tree after a bad slice!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tiger Woods tops $100M in...