Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,084 posts)
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 11:56 AM Sep 2012

Frankenstein's Monsters, otherwise known as the big banks



(Bloomberg) Shareholders of Wall Street banks who agree with former Citigroup Inc. (C) Chief Executive Officer Sanford “Sandy” Weill that the companies should be broken up face an obstacle: bondholders.

That’s because trading on Wall Street relies on borrowed money, or leverage, that can be obtained cheaply as long as the traders belong to a conglomerate such as Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) or Citigroup that gets federally insured deposits. Jefferies Group Inc. (JEF), a securities firm that isn’t part of a bank and can’t turn to the Federal Reserve for help, currently is charged more to borrow in the credit markets.

“If you divorce them from the mother ship, you’d also be divorcing them from the government at the same time, and that’s where the subsidy is,” Cornelius Hurley, director of the Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law at Boston University, said in a telephone interview. “The funding advantage is the key.”

With stock prices at or below liquidation value, Wall Street’s biggest banks are fending off calls to break up from stockholders, analysts and industry veterans including Weill. The firms are too complex to manage, over-burdened by regulation, and a risk to taxpayers, their critics say. ...................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-03/breaking-up-banks-is-hard-with-traders-hooked-on-deposits.html



3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Frankenstein's Monsters, otherwise known as the big banks (Original Post) marmar Sep 2012 OP
i don't know that i think they are over burdened by regulation -- xchrom Sep 2012 #1
Eliminate the banks, and have the government lend directly to the people! Democrats_win Sep 2012 #2
K&R for the Kleptocracy. n/t Egalitarian Thug Sep 2012 #3

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
1. i don't know that i think they are over burdened by regulation --
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 12:09 PM
Sep 2012

but what ever it takes to break them into a thousand little pieces.

Democrats_win

(6,539 posts)
2. Eliminate the banks, and have the government lend directly to the people!
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 12:32 PM
Sep 2012

Since the banks get this government insurance, they can borrow money cheeply. Then they vastly increase the interest rate and lend it to hard-working Americans who are paying taxes so that the government can support the banks.

Then the banks complain that THEY are paying too munch in taxes and that THEY are overregulated. What a joke!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Frankenstein's Monsters, ...