Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrankenstein's Monsters, otherwise known as the big banks
(Bloomberg) Shareholders of Wall Street banks who agree with former Citigroup Inc. (C) Chief Executive Officer Sanford Sandy Weill that the companies should be broken up face an obstacle: bondholders.
Thats because trading on Wall Street relies on borrowed money, or leverage, that can be obtained cheaply as long as the traders belong to a conglomerate such as Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) or Citigroup that gets federally insured deposits. Jefferies Group Inc. (JEF), a securities firm that isnt part of a bank and cant turn to the Federal Reserve for help, currently is charged more to borrow in the credit markets.
If you divorce them from the mother ship, youd also be divorcing them from the government at the same time, and thats where the subsidy is, Cornelius Hurley, director of the Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law at Boston University, said in a telephone interview. The funding advantage is the key.
With stock prices at or below liquidation value, Wall Streets biggest banks are fending off calls to break up from stockholders, analysts and industry veterans including Weill. The firms are too complex to manage, over-burdened by regulation, and a risk to taxpayers, their critics say. ...................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-03/breaking-up-banks-is-hard-with-traders-hooked-on-deposits.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1214 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Frankenstein's Monsters, otherwise known as the big banks (Original Post)
marmar
Sep 2012
OP
xchrom
(108,903 posts)1. i don't know that i think they are over burdened by regulation --
but what ever it takes to break them into a thousand little pieces.
Democrats_win
(6,539 posts)2. Eliminate the banks, and have the government lend directly to the people!
Since the banks get this government insurance, they can borrow money cheeply. Then they vastly increase the interest rate and lend it to hard-working Americans who are paying taxes so that the government can support the banks.
Then the banks complain that THEY are paying too munch in taxes and that THEY are overregulated. What a joke!
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)3. K&R for the Kleptocracy. n/t