General Discussion

IADEMO2004

(5,556 posts) Wed Nov 13, 2019, 03:13 PM Nov 2019

tRump released Ukraine funds because the jig was up.

You shit head Gym Jordan the

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

tRump released Ukraine funds because the jig was up. (Original Post) IADEMO2004 Nov 2019 OP

The funds were released by someone in the State Department... dchill Nov 2019 #1

+1 moondust Nov 2019 #3

I thought John Bolton did. boston bean Nov 2019 #5

I was disappointed D_Master81 Nov 2019 #2

The state department did, not Trump. But it still remains a mystery Maribelle Nov 2019 #4

dchill

(38,516 posts)

1. The funds were released by someone in the State Department...

Reply to IADEMO2004 (Original post)

Wed Nov 13, 2019, 03:16 PM

Nov 2019

I don't think we have a name, but State Department lawyers determined that withholding the aid was illegal, and subsequently the funds were released.

moondust

(20,002 posts)

3. +1

Reply to dchill (Reply #1)

Wed Nov 13, 2019, 03:23 PM

Nov 2019

boston bean

(36,223 posts)

5. I thought John Bolton did.

Reply to dchill (Reply #1)

Wed Nov 13, 2019, 03:28 PM

Nov 2019

D_Master81

(1,822 posts)

2. I was disappointed

Reply to IADEMO2004 (Original post)

Wed Nov 13, 2019, 03:20 PM

Nov 2019

Schiff didn’t hit back on that point immediately. Maybe I missed it but Jordan looked so smug with his smirk like he just broke the whole case down with that point when we all know trump didn’t do it for the good of Ukraine.

Maribelle

(4,783 posts)

4. The state department did, not Trump. But it still remains a mystery

Reply to IADEMO2004 (Original post)

Wed Nov 13, 2019, 03:27 PM

Nov 2019

The State Department decision, which hasn’t been reported previously, stemmed from a legal finding made earlier in the year, and conveyed in a classified memorandum to Secretary of State Michael Pompeo. State Department lawyers found the White House Office of Management and Budget, and thus the president, had no legal standing to block spending of the Ukraine aid.

What was the "legal finding"?

Reply to this discussion