Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WashPo has issued a correction to a story about the FBI agent who supposedly altered a document. (Original Post) triron Nov 2019 OP
Trump through Barr is still trying to get revenge on Strzok for dissing that amoral pig. Thomas Hurt Nov 2019 #1
+1 Baitball Blogger Nov 2019 #7
Too late - the Cat is out of the Bag jpak Nov 2019 #2
Shit. I hate this story. Even if it's "nothing" they're going to Mike 03 Nov 2019 #3
Racists need cover OhNo-Really Nov 2019 #4
Gives the media their both-sides discussions. triron Nov 2019 #5
fire that editor!!! Grasswire2 Nov 2019 #6
Would be nice if perhaps Comey or McCabe could shed some light on this. Mike 03 Nov 2019 #8
Apparently that was the point, to put out there false information Iliyah Nov 2019 #9
not at all surprised that this sort of misinfo is getting planted out there. will only get worse. NRaleighLiberal Nov 2019 #10
Trial balloon, the retractions would be underplayed on winger state outlets and the WH will continue uponit7771 Nov 2019 #11
Do we know what the alterations were wryter2000 Nov 2019 #12
Either way NewJeffCT Nov 2019 #17
I hadn't heard that wryter2000 Nov 2019 #20
K&R...👍🏼 spanone Nov 2019 #13
Coming up: Did employee sneeze on document or get a drop of coffee on it? Or was it someone else? struggle4progress Nov 2019 #14
so of course there will be a thorough review of how this dangerous misinformation arose? 0rganism Nov 2019 #15
hell of a mistake. can't really be undone now that they have their teeth in it. EveHammond13 Nov 2019 #16
Chuck Todd is gonna make a bothsider comment out of this. Pepsidog Nov 2019 #18
I used to watch Meet the Press many years ago, gab13by13 Nov 2019 #21
Next correction will be that Barr fabricated the whole thing. lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #19
that is a pretty bad mistake Skittles Nov 2019 #22

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
3. Shit. I hate this story. Even if it's "nothing" they're going to
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 01:15 PM
Nov 2019

turn it into Mount-f#cking Everest.

Grasswire2

(13,571 posts)
6. fire that editor!!!
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 01:20 PM
Nov 2019

Wouldn't that be the first thing the fact checker should have checked in an inflammatory story?????????????????????

DAMN.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
8. Would be nice if perhaps Comey or McCabe could shed some light on this.
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 01:33 PM
Nov 2019

They weren't shy about making public statements when they were selling their books. Maybe they could come back on Deadline White House to either calm us down or scare us even more. Bet they have some idea what this is about.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
9. Apparently that was the point, to put out there false information
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 01:43 PM
Nov 2019

concerning Strozk and let the insane deep throat asswipes run with it as fact.

uponit7771

(90,359 posts)
11. Trial balloon, the retractions would be underplayed on winger state outlets and the WH will continue
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 01:47 PM
Nov 2019

... to drip drip false info.

Sounds like this is what Barr and Trump were arguing about the other day

wryter2000

(46,077 posts)
12. Do we know what the alterations were
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 03:02 PM
Nov 2019

We're assuming they were to hurt Trump. Could have been the other way around.

struggle4progress

(118,332 posts)
14. Coming up: Did employee sneeze on document or get a drop of coffee on it? Or was it someone else?
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 03:07 PM
Nov 2019

Conflicting stories cause confusion. Our distinguished panel of rightwing blowhards will loudly shed as little light as possible for as long as possible, while sounding as aggrieved and outraged as they can, over who knows what

0rganism

(23,967 posts)
15. so of course there will be a thorough review of how this dangerous misinformation arose?
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 03:16 PM
Nov 2019

the fake story didn't write itself. the connection to Strzok didn't spontaneously appear from the aether. someone put it there.

who? what? where? when? why? seems like questions an aspiring journalist might ask.

gab13by13

(21,385 posts)
21. I used to watch Meet the Press many years ago,
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 04:04 PM
Nov 2019

I have no interest in watching Meet the Republicans nor his weekday waste of time show.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WashPo has issued a corre...