General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you haven't had occasion to visit Snopes you may not have realized....
... that they are fighting an expensive, years long lawsuit. The link below is the one that is available on the Snopes.com home page.
We need to #FightFor Facts !!!!
https://www.gofundme.com/f/savesnopes?viewupdates=1&rcid=r01-157489770257-effdcefa1e804cdd&utm_medium=email&utm_source=customer&utm_campaign=p_email%2B1137-update-supporters-v5b
tia
las
Hekate
(90,715 posts)Beartracks
(12,816 posts)erronis
(15,303 posts)The actual SLAPP piece starts at 7 minutes with the previous bits about Murray Coal.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)Liberal In Texas
(13,558 posts)Another reason I'm thinking about subscribing to HBO.
Bluepinky
(2,275 posts)I didnt know about SLAPP lawsuits and that many states dont allow them. In the states that allow them, they should require the filer to pay for the defendants legal costs after they lose the case.
erronis
(15,303 posts)Resolving passionate debates (and fierce disagreements) requires a shared sense of the basic facts, as Sacha Baron Cohen expressed so eloquently in his epic speech to the Anti-Defamation League.
Link:
Link to tweet
We are grateful Snopes has had the opportunity to contribute to building and maintaining that shared foundation of facts for 25 years.
But without the support of our readers, Snopes would have been put out of business by the lawsuit that has threatened our existence for more than two years.
For a third year, Snopes team members will meet our families at the Thanksgiving table and have to answer, again, why a lawsuit continues to plague us.
Luckily, this year well have a funny and insightful Last Week Tonight with John Oliver segment to help us explain it.
Link: https://www.snopes.com/2019/11/22/frivolous-lawsuits-threaten-news/
And, thanks to generous supporters like you, we can honestly tell our families we feel confident that we will endure.
Truthfully and gratefully yours,
Team Snopes
bitterross
(4,066 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts)OneCrazyDiamond
(2,032 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)David Mikkelson's ex-wife sold her interest and he's trying to divorce Snopes from the new co-owner. I have no sympathy for him.
soldierant
(6,890 posts)when Barbara was still there, that she was doing most of the work, or at least most of the writing.
But sympathy for David is one thing and not wanting to use a valued resource is another.
Bev54
(10,053 posts)That snopes was no longer the apolitical site and leaned far more right with new ownership. I have not been using them any longer.
Maggiemayhem
(811 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)... or another?
tia
las
onenote
(42,715 posts)Notably, folks on the right are absolutely convinced Snopes is a left-wing fake news site.
oldsoftie
(12,558 posts)If folks here think they're too far right & the folks on the right think they're too far left, they're probably pretty accurate
ramen
(790 posts)as this is all news to me.
NBachers
(17,122 posts)AllyCat
(16,193 posts)Guess not.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)While he stays pretty much apolitical in public he was a registered Republican in 2000.
https://www.jacksonville.com/article/20120928/NEWS/801246493
Uncle Joe
(58,369 posts)Thanks for the thread Las.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,174 posts)I wrote them an email expressing how appalled I am to find out they are suing Snopes. You'd think a news magazine would NOT be suing a site that separates fact from fiction.
support@salon.com
LAS14
(13,783 posts)rocktivity
(44,577 posts)It all started with a buyout, not a free speech issue:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029364940
rocktivity
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)Snopes has been a fighting against RWBS for ages.
klook
(12,157 posts)is a vital part of my Internet experience. Thats why Im happy to support all of them with my dollars.