General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTurley works for CBS as a political analyst- Fire his ass!
CBS
How can you let this mans obvious bias & ignorance stand is beyond me.
This AM's show on CBS the host had to basically chew her own words when she told her audience he was a employee oh thiers. Obviously embarrassed by him.
Take a clue-get on the right side of history or just think of the boycotts.
#FIRE TURLEY
napi21
(45,806 posts)today, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't say them. This is no different that when you have two side in a courtroom. Everyone will agree with one or the other, but that doesn't mean that either side is wrong, but that one side was more convincing than the other.
Boxerfan
(2,533 posts)He should be fired.
I understand the let the idiot speak 1st amm argument.
This is not that-it is about a public service being maligned & deviated to a dis-information campaign. Not covered by 1st amm.
We need a revised and stronger fairness doctrine.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)don't matter but appearance is everything. This is what reality TV mass media
has brought us to accept as normal.
samnsara
(17,622 posts)... I dont think we should be too quick to judge. He even got the WH counsel to cringe..
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)way down and let the courts respond to the validity of the subpoenas issued by the House Intelligence Committee. The House needs to have public testimony by McGahn, Bolden, Giuliani, Pompeo and on and on after the courts rule in favor of the House's subpoenas. If THIS race to Impeach continues, it will likely not end well for the Democrats imo. The House needs a legal lock several times over on this Impeachment. Get moving NOW!
Backseat Driver
(4,392 posts)remove him from office, but it's clear that POTUS represents a clear and present danger to the stability of this country, having no regard for his oath of office. As such, the House's constitutional responsibility to reveal evidence and testimony toward removal can't be fast enough. Everyone has their own personal bias; lawyers too, and Turley is surely entitled by the constitution to spout his version, but to claim it should rule the day seems to completely eliminate the role of DOJ in deciding if (really?) constitutional responsibilities of citizens called in an investigation to comply with rule of law is illegal by fault of personal bias of those we rely on to follow rule of law (really?), like those politically stacked on SCOTUS are mini-Gods that are not so influenced as well? Anarchy ensues when DOJ must decide in favor of one so corrupt to the point of investigation into his activities of organized conspiratorial crime and so unsuited to his Office!
pecosbob
(7,541 posts)They hire all the liars the GOP send their way to make sure Republican criminality is normalized.