Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate Confirms Trump Judicial Nominee Who Cried When Confronted With Anti-Gay Record
Lawrence VanDyke is just the latest Trump nominee whom Republicans confirmed despite a Not Qualified rating.
The Senate confirmed Lawrence VanDyke to a lifetime appointment on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday by a vote of 5144. Every Republican present except Sen. Susan Collins voted for the nomination; every Democrat present opposed it. Like Sarah Pitlyk, a judicial nominee confirmed just last week, VanDyke received a rare Not Qualified rating from the American Bar Association. After conducting 60 interviews, the ABA found that VanDyke has a reputation as arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice including procedural rules. Video of VanDyke lecturing, scolding, and interrupting judges during oral argument while serving as Nevada solicitor general lends credence to that assessment.
VanDyke has a long record as an anti-LGBTQ activist. He wrote in 2004 that marriage equality will hurt families, and consequentially children and society. As the solicitor general of Montana, he advocated for the state to join two briefs alleging that legal recognition of same-sex relationships would harm children. The first claimed that prohibiting same-sex marriage promoted optimal childrearing because same-sex couples cannot provide the optimal family structure. And the second asserted that states may rationally conclude that it is better for parents to have a biological connection to their children. (The Supreme Court disagreed, ruling that a same-sex marriage ban humiliates the children of gay couples.) In 2010, VanDyke also filed a brief urging the Supreme Court to rule that student groups at public universities have a First Amendment right to discriminate against LGBTQ students.
In light of this record, the ABA expressed concern over whether VanDyke would be fair to persons who are gay, lesbian, or otherwise part of the LGBTQ community. During VanDykes confirmation hearing, Missouri GOP Sen. Josh Hawley asked him if the ABA was right to worry. Do you believe, Hawley asked sympathetically, that you would treat LGBTQ litigants unfairly? I do not believe that, VanDyke said. Then he started crying. It is a fundamental belief of mine that all people are created in the image of God, he insisted. They should all be treated with dignity and respect. The victimizer had become the victim.
VanDyke, a longtime member of the Federalist Society, brought that groups priorities to the Montana solicitor generals office. He threw the state into a case challenging a federal law banning those under 21 from buying handguns, arguing that the ban probably does violate the original meaning of the Second Amendment because 18-year-olds were part of the militia. He also defended a bizarre Montana statute that attempted to nullify federal law by declaring Montana-made firearms not subject to federal law or regulation. In internal emails, VanDyke acknowledged that his argument may not pass the straight-face test. Unsurprisingly, VanDyke also co-authored a brief defending 20-week abortion bans and urging the Supreme Court to reconsider Roe v. Wade wholesale.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/12/lawrence-vandyke-ninth-circuit-not-qualified.html?via=rss_socialflow_twitter
The Senate confirmed Lawrence VanDyke to a lifetime appointment on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday by a vote of 5144. Every Republican present except Sen. Susan Collins voted for the nomination; every Democrat present opposed it. Like Sarah Pitlyk, a judicial nominee confirmed just last week, VanDyke received a rare Not Qualified rating from the American Bar Association. After conducting 60 interviews, the ABA found that VanDyke has a reputation as arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice including procedural rules. Video of VanDyke lecturing, scolding, and interrupting judges during oral argument while serving as Nevada solicitor general lends credence to that assessment.
VanDyke has a long record as an anti-LGBTQ activist. He wrote in 2004 that marriage equality will hurt families, and consequentially children and society. As the solicitor general of Montana, he advocated for the state to join two briefs alleging that legal recognition of same-sex relationships would harm children. The first claimed that prohibiting same-sex marriage promoted optimal childrearing because same-sex couples cannot provide the optimal family structure. And the second asserted that states may rationally conclude that it is better for parents to have a biological connection to their children. (The Supreme Court disagreed, ruling that a same-sex marriage ban humiliates the children of gay couples.) In 2010, VanDyke also filed a brief urging the Supreme Court to rule that student groups at public universities have a First Amendment right to discriminate against LGBTQ students.
In light of this record, the ABA expressed concern over whether VanDyke would be fair to persons who are gay, lesbian, or otherwise part of the LGBTQ community. During VanDykes confirmation hearing, Missouri GOP Sen. Josh Hawley asked him if the ABA was right to worry. Do you believe, Hawley asked sympathetically, that you would treat LGBTQ litigants unfairly? I do not believe that, VanDyke said. Then he started crying. It is a fundamental belief of mine that all people are created in the image of God, he insisted. They should all be treated with dignity and respect. The victimizer had become the victim.
VanDyke, a longtime member of the Federalist Society, brought that groups priorities to the Montana solicitor generals office. He threw the state into a case challenging a federal law banning those under 21 from buying handguns, arguing that the ban probably does violate the original meaning of the Second Amendment because 18-year-olds were part of the militia. He also defended a bizarre Montana statute that attempted to nullify federal law by declaring Montana-made firearms not subject to federal law or regulation. In internal emails, VanDyke acknowledged that his argument may not pass the straight-face test. Unsurprisingly, VanDyke also co-authored a brief defending 20-week abortion bans and urging the Supreme Court to reconsider Roe v. Wade wholesale.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/12/lawrence-vandyke-ninth-circuit-not-qualified.html?via=rss_socialflow_twitter
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 476 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Confirms Trump Judicial Nominee Who Cried When Confronted With Anti-Gay Record (Original Post)
demmiblue
Dec 2019
OP
CrispyQ
(36,492 posts)1. The television show "The Good Fight" has court room scenes with Trump appointed judges.
If the writing is accurate, they are completely unqualified to run a courtroom and are easily manipulated by both the prosecution and the defense, because they are clueless.
So much damage.