Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Grasswire2

(13,571 posts) Mon Dec 16, 2019, 06:28 PM Dec 2019

19

Justice Gorsuch going on FOX and FRIENDS????

[link:http://

Link to tweet

?s=20|

Does anyone have more info?

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justice Gorsuch going on FOX and FRIENDS???? (Original Post) Grasswire2 Dec 2019 OP

they're certainly no longer trying to hide their goals Skittles Dec 2019 #1

Same thought. blm Dec 2019 #2

Gorsuch is sending a message directly to Putin's Poodle, probably hinting at tax return leanings. TheBlackAdder Dec 2019 #22

Does anyone have more info? onenote Dec 2019 #3

Outrage Corps at it again-- it's great when RBG goes on TV, but not Gorsuch... TreasonousBastard Dec 2019 #7

Fox and Friends is not just "TV". nt Grasswire2 Dec 2019 #8

And to many viewers, neither is most of MSNBC... TreasonousBastard Dec 2019 #9

No. Absolutely no. Grasswire2 Dec 2019 #10

Bothside-ing is usually a case of false equivalency. Amishman Dec 2019 #23

Sorry but Faux NewsSmear merchants are telling lies and MSNBC is not. nt UniteFightBack Dec 2019 #12

Ok, who determines what TV shows Justices are allowed to go on? former9thward Dec 2019 #18

Fox News is un-American propaganda. It push is to destroy our democracy. rockfordfile Dec 2019 #13

So you saying both sides do it huh? Joe941 Dec 2019 #14

Yeah, from both sides. pintobean Dec 2019 #19

Nice try TB. pintobean Dec 2019 #17

It's not the first time. He did an interview with them back in Sept. octoberlib Dec 2019 #4

Furthering the goals of the Fascist Society dalton99a Dec 2019 #5

I hope he declares this bribe...err...income and doesn't pull a Clarance Thomas Farmer-Rick Dec 2019 #6

This is grounds for impeachment YessirAtsaFact Dec 2019 #11

Oh FFS, this isn't grounds for impeachment, dware Dec 2019 #15

+1 onenote Dec 2019 #16

Multiple justices have run for office while they were sitting on the court. NYC Liberal Dec 2019 #20

What can Roberts do? Polybius Dec 2019 #21

Skittles

(153,193 posts)

1. they're certainly no longer trying to hide their goals

Reply to Grasswire2 (Original post)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 06:29 PM

Dec 2019

fascist fuckers

blm

(113,092 posts)

2. Same thought.

Reply to Skittles (Reply #1)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 06:30 PM

Dec 2019

TheBlackAdder

(28,213 posts)

22. Gorsuch is sending a message directly to Putin's Poodle, probably hinting at tax return leanings.

Reply to Skittles (Reply #1)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 05:07 AM

Dec 2019

.

The phraseology he uses will probably be key to hint at how they are leaning, to ease that POS's mind about it.

.

onenote

(42,761 posts)

3. Does anyone have more info?

Reply to Grasswire2 (Original post)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 06:36 PM

Dec 2019

Its not as if Supreme Court justices haven't appeared on cable news or late night tv shows before.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)

7. Outrage Corps at it again-- it's great when RBG goes on TV, but not Gorsuch...

Reply to onenote (Reply #3)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 06:47 PM

Dec 2019

We really do have to get out battles organized.

Grasswire2

(13,571 posts)

8. Fox and Friends is not just "TV". nt

Reply to TreasonousBastard (Reply #7)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 07:15 PM

Dec 2019

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)

9. And to many viewers, neither is most of MSNBC...

Reply to Grasswire2 (Reply #8)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 07:23 PM

Dec 2019

If Fox is bad because of its political bent, so must Rachel be.

The difference is really only that we agree with Rachel.

Grasswire2

(13,571 posts)

10. No. Absolutely no.

Reply to TreasonousBastard (Reply #9)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 07:31 PM

Dec 2019

Both siderism is a trap.

There is truth. It exists. Evidence is evidence. Propaganda is propaganda.

Good god almighty.

I am astounded at your apparent capitulation.

Amishman

(5,559 posts)

23. Bothside-ing is usually a case of false equivalency.

Reply to Grasswire2 (Reply #10)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 08:31 AM

Dec 2019

Here it's pretty accurate.

I don't see the fuss. He's a conservative appearing on a mainstream conservative channel. If he was doing an exclusive with Breitbart or Infowars, then I could see the outrage.

UniteFightBack

(8,231 posts)

12. Sorry but Faux NewsSmear merchants are telling lies and MSNBC is not. nt

Reply to TreasonousBastard (Reply #9)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 08:03 PM

Dec 2019

former9thward

(32,082 posts)

18. Ok, who determines what TV shows Justices are allowed to go on?

Reply to UniteFightBack (Reply #12)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 10:50 PM

Dec 2019

rockfordfile

(8,704 posts)

13. Fox News is un-American propaganda. It push is to destroy our democracy.

Reply to TreasonousBastard (Reply #9)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 08:09 PM

Dec 2019

That's why their viewers were so easy for Russia's propaganda

Joe941

(2,848 posts)

14. So you saying both sides do it huh?

Reply to TreasonousBastard (Reply #9)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 08:16 PM

Dec 2019

I think I've heard that before.

pintobean

(18,101 posts)

19. Yeah, from both sides.

Reply to Joe941 (Reply #14)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 11:12 PM

Dec 2019

pintobean

(18,101 posts)

17. Nice try TB.

Reply to TreasonousBastard (Reply #9)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 10:35 PM

Dec 2019

Who could have predicted the reaction?

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)

4. It's not the first time. He did an interview with them back in Sept.

Reply to Grasswire2 (Original post)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 06:37 PM

Dec 2019

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/460345-neil-gorsuch-to-appear-in-first-tv-interview-with-foxs-shannon-bream

The Supreme Court really does need ethics rules passed. Sheldon Whitehouse has been pushing for this.

dalton99a

(81,590 posts)

5. Furthering the goals of the Fascist Society

Reply to Grasswire2 (Original post)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 06:40 PM

Dec 2019

dba the Federalist Society

Farmer-Rick

(10,212 posts)

6. I hope he declares this bribe...err...income and doesn't pull a Clarance Thomas

Reply to Grasswire2 (Original post)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 06:46 PM

Dec 2019

YessirAtsaFact

(2,064 posts)

11. This is grounds for impeachment

Reply to Grasswire2 (Original post)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 08:01 PM

Dec 2019

A Supreme Court Justice is not supposed to be partisan

dware

(12,438 posts)

15. Oh FFS, this isn't grounds for impeachment,

Reply to YessirAtsaFact (Reply #11)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 08:18 PM

Dec 2019

if that were true, then RBG would be up for impeachment for appearing on MSNBC.

onenote

(42,761 posts)

16. +1

Reply to dware (Reply #15)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 10:06 PM

Dec 2019

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)

20. Multiple justices have run for office while they were sitting on the court.

Reply to YessirAtsaFact (Reply #11)

Mon Dec 16, 2019, 11:19 PM

Dec 2019

If that wasn’t considered impeachable, this definitely isn’t.

Polybius

(15,481 posts)

21. What can Roberts do?

Reply to Grasswire2 (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 03:39 AM

Dec 2019

He can't fire or suspend him.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justice Gorsuch going on ...