General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI heard John Brennan
last night on Chris Hays talking about revamping the executive and legislative branches, that some ideas were advanced a few years ago, and not acted on. I think to break up the logjam on getting goals accomplished.
I just thought of a simple idea that might make a difference. In the House and Senate, instead of the elected officials sitting on one side of the aisle or the other, have them alternate seats across the whole chamber. Stop being adversaries for party idealogies and sit there for our country. Maybe if they had to sit by one another, it would help spread civility and humanity.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)Anything that has the potential for increasing bipartisan dialogue is good in my book.
Marthe48
(17,015 posts)I feel like our country has been marking time for too long.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)Its easier to like them and get along and cooperate. When knowing people as a group, whether as Democrats, Republicans, Muslims, African-Americans, or whoever, its so much easier to lump everyone together and applying the worse traits to everyone. But, if I know Larry or Martha or Bob or Mandy, I know them as a person. And Im much more likely to like them. Would probably work with our politicians, too.
Marthe48
(17,015 posts)but dilute the partyovercountryism that the separation of the aisle promotes. Try to bring back the idea that they are elected to represent all of the people, not just the ones with the squeakiest wheels. Not just the ones who voted for them.
dem in texas
(2,674 posts)If an elected member of Congress did not have a secure seat, he or she would be more willing to compromise on major issues.
Marthe48
(17,015 posts)and what good does it do for the voters? None.