Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCharles P. Pierce: Turns Out Mitch McConnell Might Have More Soft Spots in His Caucus Than Nancy Pe
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a30286805/nancy-pelosi-impeachment-send-senate-mitch-mcconnell/Turns Out Mitch McConnell Might Have More Soft Spots in His Caucus Than Nancy Pelosi Does
The dynamics of the impeachment fight are changing, even if it remains unlikely the president* will be removed by the Senate.
By Charles P. Pierce
Dec 19, 2019
It hardly bears repeating any more, but Speaker Nancy (Dont Make Me Turn This Car Around) Pelosi doesnt make many bad moves. (These Politico quotes from Tim Ryan, who challenged her for Speaker and who subsequently got whipped like a red-headed mule, are nothing if not an important validation of this.) She is playing the current moment like a master, and I say this as someone who had doubts all along about holding back the articles of impeachments from the Senate.
Mitch McConnells speech to the Senate on Thursday proved me wrong about it. He really had nothing, mainly channelling Louie Gohmert outtakes and, with every one of those he spun out, he handed Pelosi more leverage. His partisans claim that, sooner or later, hes simply going to call the question. Some Democrats seem nervous about this, too. I dont think hed dare. For the first time, I think, several worms have turned.
Bear in mind, thanks to the intervention of an automobile into my daily affairs, this is all speculation based on information gleaned from only those sources available to the rest of yall. But I think McConnell made a huge mistake earlier when he pretty much announced that the oath hell have to take as a juror in a Senate trial isnt worth the powder to blow it to hell. (Lindsey Graham is in a similar box.) Its hard to make the case that the House process was slipshod when youve pretty much admitted the Senate process is a sham. That gifted Pelosi and her team with leverage that they didnt previously have.
snip//
And thats something else thats changed in the last week. Outside of Jeff Van Drew, Collin Peterson, and half of some guy from Maine, the Democratic members of the House who were supposed to be timorous about the whole impeachment business have proven themselves to be winter soldiers of the first rankespecially Elissa Slotkin of Michigan and Joe Cunningham of South Carolina. Meanwhile, there are somewhere between four and eight Republican incumbents in the Senate who have to be casting phasers-on-stun side-eye down Pennsylvania Avenue in the general direction of Camp Runamuck. McConnell has more potential mushiness in his caucus than Pelosi turned out to have in hers, and Pelosi doesnt have a half-maniacal president* in her ear, either.
All of this doesnt make conviction and removal of the president* any more likely than it was before Wednesdays vote, but its not something you can hand-wave away, either. The cliches that sustained the impeachment narrative are no longer operative. Worms are turning.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1611 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (46)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charles P. Pierce: Turns Out Mitch McConnell Might Have More Soft Spots in His Caucus Than Nancy Pe (Original Post)
babylonsister
Dec 2019
OP
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)1. K&R, if Moscow Mitch had everything on lock like Pelosi then he didn't need to coordinate with I-45
dweller
(23,651 posts)2. (Don't Make Me Turn this Car Around)
that was the look she gave yesterday at either the passing of the 1st or 2nd Article of Impeachment... somebody with pic posting skills please post it
✌🏼
Wounded Bear
(58,703 posts)3. It's in another thread (more than one, actually)...
dweller
(23,651 posts)5. yes !
👍🏻 🙏🏻
✌🏼
mcar
(42,372 posts)4. Happy to see our Pierce back!
He is so right.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)6. If Speaker Pelosi delays the process up to the point that I-45 can't
push challengers into the primaries on Super Tuesday of disloyal Repuke senators, they might grow a spine and vote against him in a senate trial. They have one truly great opportunity to dump Trump.