General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSchumer Demands All Ukraine Evidence At Impeachment Trial
BY JASON EASLEY at Politicus USA
Schumer Demands All Ukraine Evidence At Impeachment Trial
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/12/23/schumer-demands-all-ukraine-evidence-at-impeachment-trial.html
"SNIP.....
As Mitch McConnell pushes a sham trial, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer is asking all Ukraine documents and evidence at Trumps impeachment trial.
Schumer wrote in a letter to his colleagues, which he provided to PoliticusUSA:
As the Senate prepares for the impeachment trial of President Trump, there has been a great deal of discussion regarding the need for the testimony of witnesses. I believe it is essential that the Senate hear from certain witnesses in order to conduct a full, fair and speedy trial in this case, and I made this clear to Leader McConnell both in my written proposal of December 15th and when we met in person on December 19th.
I am writing today to ask all Senators to consider another, equally important aspect of the trial that has thus far received less attention: the need for the Senate to review documentary evidence. In my December 15th letter, I proposed that the Senate subpoena both a short list of four witnesses and a limited set of relevant documents from the Administration. These documents fall into three evidentiary categories: (1) the effort to induce and pressure Ukraine to announce certain political investigations; (2) the withholding of a White House meeting desperately sought by the newly-elected President of Ukraine; and (3) the order to hold, and later release, $391 million in military assistance to Ukraine.
......SNIP"
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)... but at least he can make them look bad while they spit in his face.
tableturner
(1,683 posts)The public is already behind have testimony and documents available. It will only get worse for the GOP as time goes on. We should NOT give in!
And quit believing Republicans who say "The public will turn against Pelosi if she does not fold." Baloney....it's the other way around.
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)They didn't seem to hold much sway over his actions during the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings.
And quit believing Republicans who say "The public will turn against Pelosi if she does not fold." Baloney....it's the other way around.
I'd love to believe that. But I keep hearing such predictions that then fail to play out.
ooky
(8,924 posts)MAGATs the same as everyone else. The support will break along partisan lines. However, I am solidly in the camp that we have every right and, frankly, a duty to hold out for conditions that will lead to a fair trial, no matter how long it takes. I see no reason whatsoever not to continue holding the articles of impeachment until we get what we want, nor should it create any so called "pressure" for us to cave the longer it goes. I think all that pressure goes on Trump.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Hiding on the slopes of Deer Valley?