Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,071 posts)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 11:24 AM Jan 2020

The official Trump line on Soleimani strike starts to unravel

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-official-trump-line-soleimani-strike-starts-unravel?cid=sm_fb_maddow&fbclid=IwAR29OKM9biOBX2iTDvfhUbcKIlVIv101k37qUCkB0e0IyvciAs9C4_-vIQk

The official Trump line on Soleimani strike starts to unravel
01/06/20 08:00 AM
By Steve Benen

snip//

To be sure, Team Trump’s absence of credibility, coupled with the political context, made it difficult to take seriously the White House’s line about an imminent attack, necessitating an immediate assault. But the reporting brings the problem into sharper focus: Team Trump’s official story about one of the president’s most dangerous decisions doesn’t appear to be true.

All of which leads to an important follow-up question: if the airstrike wasn’t needed to prevent an imminent attack, why exactly did the president green-light such a radical offensive?

Trump thought the dangerous new posture would help his weak image. The Washington Post reported over the weekend that the president was motivated to act, at least in part, “by what he felt was negative coverage after his 2019 decision to call off the airstrike after Iran downed the U.S. surveillance drone, officials said. Trump was also frustrated that the details of his internal deliberations had leaked out and felt he looked weak, the officials said.”

Trump was preoccupied with his predecessor. The same Post report added, “The president has long fixated on 2012 attacks on U.S. compounds in Benghazi, Libya, and the Obama administration’s response to them, said lawmakers and aides who have spoken to him, and he felt the response to this week’s attack on the embassy and the killing of an American contractor would make him look stronger compared with his predecessor.”

With his impeachment trial looming, Trump saw value in wagging the dog. The New York Times’ Rukmini Callimachi noted that Soleimani’s ?whereabouts have been known before, and his resume of “killing-by-proxy is not a secret.” So why launch this specific strike, to the surprise of the president’s own team? As Callimachi put it, it’s difficult “to decouple” Trump’s decision from the “from the impeachment saga.”

In case this isn’t painfully obvious, it’s a problem that the official White House line is unraveling. It’s just as significant a problem that the alternate explanations are indefensible.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The official Trump line on Soleimani strike starts to unravel (Original Post) babylonsister Jan 2020 OP
Well the only people that eat up his s**t are his Iliyah Jan 2020 #1
don't forget rethugs in Congress. So far, babylonsister Jan 2020 #4
daughters are llashram Jan 2020 #14
He murdered Solimani to look tough Farmer-Rick Jan 2020 #2
Uproar and consequences mount for Trump after Soleimani killing Clash City Rocker Jan 2020 #3
Any idea Corgigal Jan 2020 #5
+1 Baitball Blogger Jan 2020 #8
Viewed through a right-wing lens, all sorts of reasons such as.... KY_EnviroGuy Jan 2020 #6
They've had upwards of 30 different excuses/explanations for the Ukraine shakedown NewJeffCT Jan 2020 #7
Right Cosmocat Jan 2020 #11
a few weeks ago NewJeffCT Jan 2020 #12
by Friday the "official Trump line" will be an unraveled afterthought 0rganism Jan 2020 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author bucolic_frolic Jan 2020 #10
The problem is that the GOP TNNurse Jan 2020 #13
"negative coverage on his 2019 decision to call off airstrike after Iran downed the U.S.... Perseus Jan 2020 #15
Putting service members lives at risk duforsure Jan 2020 #16
Oh, I don't know... llmart Jan 2020 #17

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
1. Well the only people that eat up his s**t are his
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 11:32 AM
Jan 2020

dwindling base.

Somewhat sane, and sane people know t-rump, administration, cabinet and the Republican party are liars and only care about themselves.

Plus, grandmothers, mothers, aunts, nieces, sister, cousins, ok women in general do not want their sons, fathers, uncles, brothers, cousins, ok men in general to go to battle.

babylonsister

(171,071 posts)
4. don't forget rethugs in Congress. So far,
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 11:39 AM
Jan 2020

though they might know better, I'm not hearing a lot of people disavowing what he did.

llashram

(6,265 posts)
14. daughters are
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:10 PM
Jan 2020

dying in Iraq and will die in combat and associated hostile acts if we invade Iran, also.

Farmer-Rick

(10,185 posts)
2. He murdered Solimani to look tough
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 11:37 AM
Jan 2020

So he thinks he's a tough guy, chest always so puffy guy.

Diplomacy by murder to help a flailing bafoon. Geez talk about a tin pot dick-tater.

Can our government look any worse?

Clash City Rocker

(3,396 posts)
3. Uproar and consequences mount for Trump after Soleimani killing
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 11:38 AM
Jan 2020

The Trump administration is already in danger of losing control of the swift chain reaction and political storm unleashed by its killing of Iran's top general, Qasem Soleimani.

President Donald Trump's claim that the drone strike last week made Americans safer is being challenged by cascading events that appear to leave the US more vulnerable and isolated.

The administration's basis for the attack also came under renewed suspicion after Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told CNN that it was not "relevant" for him to reveal how imminent the attacks on US interests were that Trump said Soleimani was planning.

In proliferating signs of the deepening crisis, Iran on Sunday announced that it was shaking off restrictions on its uranium enrichment under the Obama-era nuclear deal. Iraq's parliament voted to expel US troops. A US exit could imperil its fight against extremism and consolidate Iranian influence in Baghdad. Dissent emerged inside the administration over the President's vow to strike cultural sites — or civilian targets — if Iran mounts reprisal strikes. Administration claims that the elimination of Soleimani, Iran's Middle East terror chief, sparked celebration in Iran were confounded by Tehran's orchestrating of Soleimani's funeral rites to launch a propaganda campaign to heal national divides.

Washington's European allies, meanwhile, distanced themselves from Trump's assault. The US-led ISIS coalition temporarily stopped action against the terror group to protect Iraqi bases from Iranian-backed militias. And in a new sign of widening gaps between Iraq and the US, Prime Minister Adil Abdul Mahdi said he had been scheduled to meet Soleimani on the day he was killed to discuss an initiative to ease Iran-Saudi tensions.

In Kenya, three Americans were killed in an attack on a military base by Al-Shabaab, a jihadist group. The group follows a Sunni strand of Islam while Iran has a Shiite Muslim majority and there was no immediate link to the killing of Soleimani. But the attack was a reminder of both the vulnerability of US personnel to terror attacks and a sign that other US adversaries might try to take advantage of the tumult for their own ends.

The growing international tumult was matched by a worsening confrontation at home with Capitol Hill Democrats and Republicans becoming even more estranged over the President's impeachment trial, a drama that was triggered by Trump's handling of another foreign policy issue -- Ukraine -- and his efforts to use his power to coerce political dirt on his domestic opponents.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/06/politics/donald-trump-iran-iraq-impeachment/index.html

Corgigal

(9,291 posts)
5. Any idea
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 11:45 AM
Jan 2020

on how much finically this stupid stunt is causing taxpayers again? All the troop movements, activating the guard to full time . On and on.

Republican voters, I use to think voted for republicans because they are cheap and don’t want to help other citizens. Now, all they do is allow their head clown to waste money, huge sums and say and do nothing. I wish we could sue Trump, based on his lies he told and force him to fund our government back.

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,492 posts)
6. Viewed through a right-wing lens, all sorts of reasons such as....
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 12:01 PM
Jan 2020

* appeasement of Israel and much needed boost to their far-right factions,
* appeasement to and boosting campaign support from Republican neocon supporters frightened by Bolton's fall,
* punishment for recent militant attacks on American interests in Iraq, and as many others have said....
* to distract from impeachment proceedings and budget deficit woes.

Regardless of his motives, IMO it will go down in history as one of the worst national security and diplomatic blunders in our history.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
7. They've had upwards of 30 different excuses/explanations for the Ukraine shakedown
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 12:02 PM
Jan 2020

and Republican in Congress are still firmly in support.

Cosmocat

(14,566 posts)
11. Right
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:40 PM
Jan 2020

as long as us LIBERALS are calling the shit out it really does not matter that the "reason" is to this brainwashed idiots.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
12. a few weeks ago
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:43 PM
Jan 2020

Barb McQuade - a former US attorney - had listed out 28 different reasons/excuses that Trump and his surrogates have used regarding Ukraine - I'm sure that number has gone up since.

0rganism

(23,957 posts)
9. by Friday the "official Trump line" will be an unraveled afterthought
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:34 PM
Jan 2020

of course it won't hold water at all, and everyone will have moved on to the next outrage which will somehow manage to be even worse

Response to babylonsister (Original post)

TNNurse

(6,927 posts)
13. The problem is that the GOP
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:57 PM
Jan 2020

has been defending the indefensible since he got in office. Well, they have actually done that during the campaign as well.

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
15. "negative coverage on his 2019 decision to call off airstrike after Iran downed the U.S....
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:23 PM
Jan 2020

surveillance drone"

I read this and it bothers the hell out of me...And let me be clear, I am not defending Iran on anything, but...

USA sends a surveillance drone to Iran (a drone is unmanned), Iran doesn't like the fact that they are being spied on and they also know that drones do shoot and kill people, so they shoot the drone down, no US lives are lost but republicans expect whoever is president to attack a country because they shot a drone that was spying on them, or maybe even planning an attack as drones are used to do so? In Florida that is called "Stand your ground", someone just made you scared about your safety, you shoot, and all is well...which it has proven to be a crazy law, but nonetheless worth for comparison.

I really do not understand that logic...You spy on someone with a robot, they shoot it down, and you are supposed to start WW-III because of a robot so that millions of innocent people can get killed...Man, are we screwed out of our heads.

duforsure

(11,885 posts)
16. Putting service members lives at risk
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:29 PM
Jan 2020

lying , for personal political gain is corrupt. He shouldn't be allowed to remain in his position for doing this. By the gop refusing to remove him now shows how little they care about these brave people defending our country for us. trump shows again he only cares about himself, not our service members. My god when will the gop put an end to this nightmare. I guess they'd rather destroy our country , our Democracy, and our national security to stay in power.

llmart

(15,540 posts)
17. Oh, I don't know...
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:44 PM
Jan 2020

I just got back from the grocery store and parked next to a car with the bumper sticker "Veteran for Trump 2020".

So there's that. Do not underestimate the number of service personnel who support/supported him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The official Trump line o...