Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 12:53 PM Jan 2020

Breaking - Bolton willing to testify to SENATE if subpoenaed




STATEMENT OF JOHN R. BOLTON
Posted on January 6, 2020

During the present impeachment controversy, I have tried to meet my obligations both as a citizen and as former National Security Advisor. My colleague, Dr. Charles Kupperman, faced with a House committee subpoena on the one hand, and a Presidential directive not to testify on the other, sought final resolution of this Constitutional conflict from the Federal judiciary. After my counsel informed the House committee that I too would seek judicial resolution of these Constitutional issues, the committee chose not to subpoena me. Nevertheless, I publicly resolved to be guided by the outcome of Dr. Kupperman’s case.

But both the President and the House of Representatives opposed his effort on jurisdictional grounds, and each other on the merits. The House committee went so far as to withdraw its subpoena to Dr. Kupperman in a deliberate attempt to moot the case and deprive the court of jurisdiction. Judge Richard Leon, in a carefully reasoned opinion on December 30, held Dr. Kupperman’s case to be moot, and therefore did not reach the separation-of-powers issues.

The House has concluded its Constitutional responsibility by adopting Articles of Impeachment related to the Ukraine matter. It now falls to the Senate to fulfill its Constitutional obligation to try impeachments, and it does not appear possible that a final judicial resolution of the still-unanswered Constitutional questions can be obtained before the Senate acts.

Accordingly, since my testimony is once again at issue, I have had to resolve the serious competing issues as best I could, based on careful consideration and study. I have concluded that, if the Senate issues a subpoena for my testimony, I am prepared to testify.


What about the House? There's still a lot of holes you could fill in for Chairman Schiff...
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
3. Will he testify if the HOUSE subpoenas him?
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 12:59 PM
Jan 2020

Or is this just so much eyewash from Bolton, knowing that Mitch McConnell's Senate will absolutely, 100%, under no circumstances, subpoena him?

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
6. Susan Hennessy is saying McConnell's effed...
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:29 PM
Jan 2020


Susan Hennessey ✔ @Susan_Hennessey

Bolton saying he will testify if subpoenaed effectively forces McConnell's hand. It's hard to imagine how Senate Republicans could possibly justify not calling him.

John Bolton ✔ @AmbJohnBolton

I have posted a brief statement regarding testimony on the Ukraine impeachment matter before the Senate at: https://www.boltonpac.com/2020/01/statement-of-john-r-bolton/


Susan Hennessey ✔ @Susan_Hennessey

Even if McConnell had votes to prevent Bolton from testifying, Bolton is clearly going public with story (either in Senate or in interviews/his book). If a small delay in story getting out is worth political hit, that's surely a sign McConnell is TERRIFIED of what Bolton knows.

12:04 PM - Jan 6, 2020


Things just got real for Moscow Mitch!

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
10. Don't know that I agree 100% with Ms. Hennessey's analysis
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:45 PM
Jan 2020

I thought Moscow Mitch couldn't possibly stall out on the Garland nomination to the Supreme Court for a full year, but I was wrong on that one. I figured public pressure would force his hand in the Senate, but McConnell serenely absorbed any approbation until the November 2016 election provided full vindication for him.

Who's going to force McConnell's hand in subpoenaing Bolton? We the People? Mitch is impervious to that pressure, as he demonstrated four years ago. The media? Please. As long as one voice at Fox supports him, Mitch will float above any media controversy, and certainly won't be answering any hostile questions.

This looks as staged as a professional wrestling "feud."

kentuck

(111,104 posts)
7. Would that make it more difficult for others to refuse to testify?
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:30 PM
Jan 2020

Such as those with the redacted emails in the OMB?

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
11. Exactly. So, he can say he'll testify, knowing he will not have to.
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:47 PM
Jan 2020

He and the others are the reason McConnell wants no witnesses. Crooks never want witnesses.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
14. Pence is a bigger hawk than Trump
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:08 PM
Jan 2020

Pence has a long enough attention span to see a war through. Bolton knows this. Trump served his purpose.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
13. He got his escalation. Trump is of no more use to him
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:07 PM
Jan 2020

I'd be chomping popcorn if the stakes were lower. But I still kind of love this.

cry baby

(6,682 posts)
15. Trump just gave Bolton the gift of war with Iran...a lifetime wet dream
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:11 PM
Jan 2020

for Bolton. And less than a week later he’s willing to testify?

Let’s remember that these bastards are transactional, not moral. If he is just now ready, he’s made a deal with the devil.

Color me a strong skeptic of his sudden change of heart.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking - Bolton willing...