General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe State of The Union....Televise or Cancel?
Given that Donald Trump has declared the that Twitter is his communication arm rather than gong to Congress, should Speaker Nancy Pelosi CANCEL the State of The Union address before the joint members of Congress?
I say she should. Spare the country of the indignity of having to sit through this farce by an Orange pile of shit LYING before the world....Submit it in writing.
7 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
Have a televised STOU? | |
1 (14%) |
|
CANCEL the STOU? | |
6 (86%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)Especially if the Senate trial is still in progress. I want to see him decompensate on live TV.
PJMcK
(22,037 posts)The Constitution directs the president to report to Congress. Explain your proposal in that light.
Secondly, theres a weird component of Congressional procedure that states that the president must be invited to speak before Congress. I guess its possible that if the Speaker doesnt invite Trump, there could be an issue.
Do you really think Speaker Pelosi would pass up a chance for Trump to melt down in front if the entire world?!
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)It was done in writing until Woodrow Wilson became president. Even so, Pelosi has already invited him and I very much doubt that she would rescind her invitation.
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)She can't cancel the SOTU... and it would certainly be televised if he does one.
All Pelosi can do is forbid him to use the House chamber for the event.
Brother Buzz
(36,444 posts)Renew Deal
(81,863 posts)TheRealNorth
(9,481 posts)Just don't watch it- because it will be nothing but Trump's lies and Democrat bashing.
0rganism
(23,957 posts)history must record, to the fullest extent possible, the declining faculties of a vicious authoritarian leader and crumbling institutions of the nation which put him at its head. our responsibility is no longer to ourselves or our immediate progeny, we've already tossed all that out the window of ruin onto the trash heap of deep regrets. now if we must posit a less-worse-case scenario, that some version of humanity and biosphere will indeed survive into the 22nd century, then that is where our true responsibility lies, and the first step to any responsible hand-off is proper documentation.
Talitha
(6,593 posts)makes no difference to me, I'm not watching it.
onenote
(42,714 posts)Sure, Pelosi could rescind the invite she sent Trump to give his SOTU speech in the House chamber. (Hint: there is zero chance she would do that).
But even if pigs started flying and Pelosi withdrew the invite, Trump could and almost certainly would announce that he will give his SOTU speech at some arena filled with thousands of his adoring faithful. And it will be shown on all the networks and will draw big ratings. Indeed, he probably wishes that Pelosi would give him that opportunity by withdrawing the invite.
Which is why I can't figure out why DUers are voting "no televised" SOTU.
Leith
(7,809 posts)Then Democrats can show the world that DFT does nothing but lie and insult people.
Either that, Madame Speaker should tell agent orange that petty insults will not be tolerated. She could halt the speech to tell him that the State of the Union has nothing to do with nasty women or lyin' <insert name here>. Public embarrassment is a powerful tool to use against hair furor.
Johonny
(20,851 posts)Because he's reading a speech someone else wrote that he's never read. He'll give it and we won't watch because it's not really him talking.