Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democrats_win

(6,539 posts)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:07 PM Jan 2020

Yeah, it was a "good" idea to assassinate someone at an airport.

Supposedly, airports are one of the most secure places for the general public. When there are terror threats, armed soldiers have been deployed to airports. In fact airports have been successfully targeted by bombs. Is it really wise to perform this United States-sponsored act of terror at an airport? Would a civilized country attack someone at an airport?

This is one more argument against Idiot Trump's terrorist act.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yeah, it was a "good" idea to assassinate someone at an airport. (Original Post) Democrats_win Jan 2020 OP
He now knows that he can snuff anyone who "isn't nice to him". louis-t Jan 2020 #1
It calls into question the character of those that carried out the assassination. LiberalFighter Jan 2020 #2
What matters is limiting collateral damage Takket Jan 2020 #3

louis-t

(23,295 posts)
1. He now knows that he can snuff anyone who "isn't nice to him".
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 03:58 PM
Jan 2020

I've said for 3 years that he admires Putin because he can kill whoever he doesn't like.

Takket

(21,577 posts)
3. What matters is limiting collateral damage
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 04:07 PM
Jan 2020

An airport isn’t any better or worse than any other place as Long as collateral damage is minimized.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yeah, it was a "good" ide...