Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mopinko

(70,132 posts)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:08 PM Jan 2020

if the turtle doesnt cave, the house should call bolton.

prolly a better way for it to play out, anyway.
hold things up while more relevant testimony is given, and the senate can play games w the questioning.
and it gets on the teevee pretty quick.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
if the turtle doesnt cave, the house should call bolton. (Original Post) mopinko Jan 2020 OP
YEP. Leghorn21 Jan 2020 #1
I would think chairman Schiff would have subpoenaed Bolton at140 Jan 2020 #2
Yeah, I think he might've considered it, then said screw this, we're not going to sit around waiting Leghorn21 Jan 2020 #5
Agreed! crickets Jan 2020 #3
he just stated he is willing. mopinko Jan 2020 #4
To appear in the Senate. If subpoenaed. Supposedly. crickets Jan 2020 #6
Did someone earlier post about Bolton & MM talking before he made this statement? 2naSalit Jan 2020 #7

Leghorn21

(13,524 posts)
1. YEP.
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:12 PM
Jan 2020

Open those articles back up and subpoena that scumbucket and then see what he’s got to say.

Otherwise, “meh” -

at140

(6,110 posts)
2. I would think chairman Schiff would have subpoenaed Bolton
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:19 PM
Jan 2020

if he thought that would help build the case for impeachment.

Leghorn21

(13,524 posts)
5. Yeah, I think he might've considered it, then said screw this, we're not going to sit around waiting
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:25 PM
Jan 2020

for court decisions, we’re MOVING ON FFS

But the road is clear now, and I personally, since I am a very bad person, I personally would *love* to see Bolton’s response to a House subpoena, and I mean LOVE IT!!!

crickets

(25,981 posts)
3. Agreed!
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:20 PM
Jan 2020

The upcoming war powers hearings are a great opportunity for the House to have a chat with Bolton. Who thinks he would actually show up? Anyone?


*chirp*chirp*

crickets

(25,981 posts)
6. To appear in the Senate. If subpoenaed. Supposedly.
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 03:05 PM
Jan 2020

Bolton has been way too coy about all of this.

John Bolton would testify in Trump impeachment probe under certain legal conditions, report says

But Bolton’s decision on complying with the inquiry is contingent on whether a constitutional court fight pans out in favor of the House or the Trump administration, the Post reported.

Bolton’s former deputy, Charles Kupperman, had been told by the Trump administration not to cooperate with the probe. But he was also subpoenaed by House Democrats to appear for a deposition. While other witnesses had chosen to defy the White House’s admonitions, Kupperman filed a lawsuit asking a judge to rule on which party has more authority.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., had warned that Kupperman may be held in contempt for defying the congressional subpoena for his testimony.

Bolton had reportedly been willing to testify in public under subpoena if Kupperman is directed by the courts to comply with the House, according to NBC News, citing a source familiar with Bolton’s situation.

But a House Intelligence Committee official said Thursday that Bolton’s lawyer would take the House panels conducting the probe to court if his client was subpoenaed.



John Bolton failed to appear at impeachment deposition

WASHINGTON — Former national security adviser John Bolton failed to appear Thursday for his closed-door deposition in the House impeachment inquiry, following the lead of other current and former Trump administration officials who have chosen not to show up.

Last week, Bolton — who was fired by Trump in September — was formally invited to testify before the three congressional committees leading the inquiry, but his lawyer, Charles Cooper, quickly made clear that his client was unwilling to appear voluntarily.



This man had the hubris to state his conditions for being willing to serve his country by testifying in the House impeachment hearings. Subpoena, no subpoena - it's all a disgraceful publicity tap dance. I would love to be wrong about this. We'll see.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»if the turtle doesnt cave...