Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGrowing doubts on legality of US strike that killed Iranian general
https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/06/middleeast/soleimani-strike-legality-doubts-us-iran-intl/index.html((CNN )In the hours and days after Qasem Soleimani was killed in a US drone strike, his demise was described in various terms: President Donald Trump said he had been "terminated"; other US officials talked about a "targeted killing" and "lethal action."
But both the Iranian President and Iraq's Prime Minister said Soleimani's death was an "assassination" -- essentially a politically motivated murder.
US officials have rejected the characterization of his killing as an assassination. That's hardly a surprise because assassinations have been illegal under US federal law since 1981. But people have still been assassinated, and the government has not always been considered in violation of the law. This is, in part, because US law does not define "assassinations" with precision, and there are other laws that administrations have used to justify their actions.
The crux of the Trump administration's argument is that the threat posed by Soleimani's plans was "imminent" and that the US response was "defensive." A key requirement in order for a strike to be lawful under Article II of the US Constitution is that a threat must be imminent.
<more>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 835 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Growing doubts on legality of US strike that killed Iranian general (Original Post)
jpak
Jan 2020
OP
BigmanPigman
(51,611 posts)1. That is a lame defense.
Semantics is a BS excuse.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)2. Doubts? Buncha hippies is more like it!
Remember how wrong all those hippies were back in 2002 and 2003? Our glorious campaign to bring peace and democracy to Iraq and Afghanistan succeeded beyond even the rosiest scenarious limned by Vice President Cheney and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld. George W. Bush, humbly strutting across the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln, perfectly framed beneath "Mission Accomplished" banner filled every red-blooded American with suitable pride.
But those hippies, they never learn. Quagmire this and clusterfuck that, but luckily their nay-saying was drowned out by the sharp rat-a-tat-tat of the boots of the triumphant military returning from action, the thanks of a grateful nation their eternal laurel of victory.