General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConsider that maybe . . . . .
. . . . . Parnas is not Giuliani's guy. Consider that, instead, he is Trump's guy who Trump put in touch with Giuliani.
Given Parnas' long association with the Trumps, that really seems much more likely.
Consider this image, as posted here on DU by KingOfAllDems:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=12887537
Response to Stinky The Clown (Original post)
underthematrix This message was self-deleted by its author.
2naSalit
(86,685 posts)OAITW r.2.0
(24,528 posts)Did Rachael probe him on his Trump relationship? That would be most illuminating.
5X
(3,972 posts)the Democrats follow the lead which turns out to be bogus,
giving dotard the opportunity to call all of it a hoax.
Speaker Pelosi says that whatever Parnas has or has handed over is not needed for the impeachment. It's great if true and that it's out in public. But it could be disinfo.
He's hinky as hell.
Cartoonist
(7,320 posts)Someone over at freepers suggested the same thing. Only his mission is to finally get the goods on Clinton.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)according to this recent article:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/10/18/trump-giuliani-ukraine-lawyer-new-york-history-friendship-229857
Catherine Vincent
(34,491 posts)If that is him, Trump's known that guy for a very long time. For all we know, he may be one of the kid's godfather.