General Discussion

highplainsdem

(48,974 posts) Thu Sep 6, 2012, 10:22 PM Sep 2012

A week ago, at this time, Clint Eastwood was talking to an empty chair.

What a difference a week, and a party, and a candidate, make...

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A week ago, at this time, Clint Eastwood was talking to an empty chair. (Original Post) highplainsdem Sep 2012 OP

Yeah - that was kinda weird. Kber Sep 2012 #1

Think about it, contrast Clinton's speech last night with Eastwood's Wednesdays Sep 2012 #3

A chair can't offer much of a debate... Q Sep 2012 #6

Telling the President of the US to fuck himself. That was too much. Way too far. MichiganVote Sep 2012 #2

I'm betting he still IS talking to an empty chair. WinkyDink Sep 2012 #4

A quick recap of the RNC siligut Sep 2012 #5

Kber

(5,043 posts)

1. Yeah - that was kinda weird.

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Thu Sep 6, 2012, 10:25 PM

Sep 2012

Wednesdays

(17,359 posts)

3. Think about it, contrast Clinton's speech last night with Eastwood's

Reply to Kber (Reply #1)

Thu Sep 6, 2012, 10:27 PM

Sep 2012

Clinton clearly explained the issues, with verifiable facts and figures.

Eastwood merely pretended the "invisible Obama" was telling him to go fuck himself.

Who made the better case?

Q

(16,599 posts)

6. A chair can't offer much of a debate...

Reply to Kber (Reply #1)

Thu Sep 6, 2012, 10:36 PM

Sep 2012

...so it was the perfect forum for Clint.

Saying hello to all my old friends here at DU.

MichiganVote

(21,086 posts)

2. Telling the President of the US to fuck himself. That was too much. Way too far.

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Thu Sep 6, 2012, 10:25 PM

Sep 2012

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)

4. I'm betting he still IS talking to an empty chair.

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Thu Sep 6, 2012, 10:27 PM

Sep 2012

siligut

(12,272 posts)

5. A quick recap of the RNC

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Thu Sep 6, 2012, 10:28 PM

Sep 2012

Segami posted this yesterday in V&M, in case anybody missed it.

Reply to this discussion