Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
Fri Jan 24, 2020, 09:52 AM Jan 2020

Lisa Murkowski

Lisa is not happy that the House did not finish their job by going thru the Courts. And now have put it in the lap of the US Senate.

If that is true, should the Senate simply ignore it? Should they see no urgency in assisting the House in getting rid of the national security threat in the White House? Because the House did not complete its investigation to meet Lisa's, and some Republicans', expectations, it has put them in a very tough situation. That is understandable.

But, a vote for witnesses is not a vote to convict. Neither is it a vote to acquit. That is the uncomfortable position that the Republicans have been placed.

However, without witnesses, the people will not see this as a fair trial. They will not see Donald Trump as being acquitted of anything. They will see a cover-up.

The witnesses will give the trial legitimacy. Otherwise, it will be nothing but a failed whitewash.

When witnesses have testified, and documents analyzed, then the vote to acquit or convict should be taken.

But not until then.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
1. She's lashing out sideways.
Fri Jan 24, 2020, 10:03 AM
Jan 2020

Trump's actions and loud mouth forced the trial and McConnell's stonewalling and her willingness to excuse blatant lies and wrongdoing gotten her there.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
2. Senator Murkowski knows fully well what is happening . .
Fri Jan 24, 2020, 10:03 AM
Jan 2020

bullshit on her "concerns" regarding the courts. She knows that the WH, DOJ, and others obstructed the investigations.

madaboutharry

(40,219 posts)
3. Murkowski needs to figure out who she is.
Fri Jan 24, 2020, 10:06 AM
Jan 2020

It seems like she swings back and forth between loyalty to a republican party she wishes still existed and wanting to do the right thing. She needs to get a clue that these two things are mutually exclusive. As long as she remains confused she comes off looking like a weakling.

C_U_L8R

(45,020 posts)
4. The House should still pursue its subpoenas in the courts
Fri Jan 24, 2020, 10:55 AM
Jan 2020

Even if it takes a while... dictatorship cannot become the rule. And shame on Murkowski for not standing up for the country.

MagickMuffin

(15,952 posts)
7. Dear Lisa Murkowski, YOU VOTED NO ON ALL THE AMENDMENTS FOR MORE WITNESSES & DOCS
Fri Jan 24, 2020, 12:40 PM
Jan 2020

So, please, spare me your BS.

You can still do something about it though. It's not too late!



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lisa Murkowski