Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:40 PM Jan 2020

HOLY MOTHER OF GOD - the new coronavirus is a 3.8!!!




Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding
@DrEricDing
HOLY MOTHER OF GOD - the new coronavirus is a 3.8!!! How bad is that reproductive R0 value? It is thermonuclear pandemic level bad - never seen an actual virality coefficient outside of Twitter in my entire career. I’m not exaggerating... #WuhanCoronovirus #CoronavirusOutbreak


Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding
@DrEricDing
·
13h
Replying to
@DrEricDing
2/ “We estimate the basic reproduction number of the infection (R_0) to be 3.8 (95% confidence interval, 3.6-4.0), indicating that 72-75% of transmissions must be prevented by control measures for infections to stop increasing...



?fbclid=IwAR1HVWO-rzMo_FLpZE319rwFVetdb9k4_zpST3Ak1gzLwcE8kgJZ6fmpcv0


89 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HOLY MOTHER OF GOD - the new coronavirus is a 3.8!!! (Original Post) pangaia Jan 2020 OP
Yieks! jimfields33 Jan 2020 #1
That concept might not be so bad.... in and of itself... pangaia Jan 2020 #3
Isn't there a 2 week incubation period before showing symptoms? maryellen99 Jan 2020 #11
The Chinese doctor that got infected died in 9 days Baclava Jan 2020 #25
This and the fact that they are talking about supers spreaders, dewsgirl Jan 2020 #31
He loves anything that distracts and this certainly fits the bill. dewsgirl Jan 2020 #28
Unless bdamomma Jan 2020 #40
Are you greytdemocrat Jan 2020 #82
Never, I would never make DU look stupid. bdamomma Jan 2020 #87
That might actually be the best course of action Amishman Jan 2020 #60
Captain Trips? NRaleighLiberal Jan 2020 #2
First thing I thought of. silverweb Jan 2020 #22
First thing I thought of. Sugar Smack Jan 2020 #27
Yea. Snackshack Jan 2020 #54
This is what eating bat guts will get you rusty fender Jan 2020 #4
interesting.... i have heard of it but pangaia Jan 2020 #5
I read somewhere MFM008 Jan 2020 #6
bats are bad, mm'K joeaddison Jan 2020 #79
I read that it came from snakes Liberalhammer Jan 2020 #7
Libtards ate gay snakes that preyed upon pot smoking bats. Arthur_Frain Jan 2020 #17
What the fuck is this shit right here. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 2020 #26
Forgot the sarcasm icon - benefit of the doubt. n/t sarge43 Jan 2020 #29
I'm not a fan of "ironic" slurs. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 2020 #30
Sorry. Arthur_Frain Jan 2020 #73
The use of -tard, even ironically, normalizes ableist slurs. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 2020 #86
My thought exactly.😳 what the absolute fuck? dewsgirl Jan 2020 #33
Zardoz speaks Liberalhammer Jan 2020 #43
This news headline just flashed into my brain as I scrolled down through the replies. Arthur_Frain Jan 2020 #76
Don't worry Liberalhammer Jan 2020 #84
So bat soup is still on the menu? Goody, cuz it's so yummy Baclava Jan 2020 #71
That's not where this came from. Ms. Toad Jan 2020 #9
Moral of story: rusty fender Jan 2020 #24
Unless they're USDA inspected. defacto7 Jan 2020 #42
and with trump even the USDA may be more undependable than it already is.. pangaia Jan 2020 #45
56 million people quarantined over a few thousand infected? If it hits Beijing and Shanghai... Baclava Jan 2020 #8
They're probably already infected. spinbaby Jan 2020 #12
Zombie Apocalypse Liberalhammer Jan 2020 #44
So, we're all infected? need more chicken soup Baclava Jan 2020 #66
Well, if a Harvard Epidemiologist gets worried... irisblue Jan 2020 #10
What does that mean in plain English--A 3.8? Nt raccoon Jan 2020 #13
It means that those infected could infect 3.8 people. It's kind of like earthquake/tornado scales. chowder66 Jan 2020 #21
A friend in HK just sent me this.. pangaia Jan 2020 #14
Discussion of the research center is big on Twitter spinbaby Jan 2020 #16
right.. dumb ignorant media... pangaia Jan 2020 #35
You'd think a bio-warfare agent release would have a death rate higher than the reported 3% Baclava Jan 2020 #19
Eye contact?😳 satire? dewsgirl Jan 2020 #34
LOL... pangaia Jan 2020 #36
Not really, one doctor that got infected said he wasn't wearing his goggles, that how he got it Baclava Jan 2020 #37
I feel stupid for even asking, the Trump era has destroyed my satire dewsgirl Jan 2020 #39
Irresponsible, reprehensible and wrong. My Pet Orangutan Jan 2020 #15
Seems to me that hyperbole is the current form of communication... pbmus Jan 2020 #52
It's closer to 2.6 at the current estimate. herding cats Jan 2020 #18
Yep. Dr. Feigl-Ding went full click-bait on one of the earliest (highly speculative) estimates. My Pet Orangutan Jan 2020 #20
When I saw that last night I face palmed. herding cats Jan 2020 #23
Thanks.... pangaia Jan 2020 #38
They likely won't even be allowed in. herding cats Jan 2020 #46
rIRight, I forgot about that.. dumb eh... pangaia Jan 2020 #48
Not dumb! herding cats Jan 2020 #69
There is evidently an infected person at Duke University Hospital in Durham, NC Scotch-Irish Jan 2020 #78
No ither source that I have access to could provide mahina Jan 2020 #32
Cap Trips for sure benld74 Jan 2020 #41
Unusual to see a doctor spreading this sort message peggysue2 Jan 2020 #47
and with trumpo's cuts to everything good in the People's Republic of American States...? pangaia Jan 2020 #49
Exactly, pangaia peggysue2 Jan 2020 #51
he's worst bdamomma Jan 2020 #88
Yawn alphafemale Jan 2020 #50
Now that I understand. Snackshack Jan 2020 #53
The timing could not have been worse, given Chinese New Year and the migration back to many OAITW r.2.0 Jan 2020 #55
Boy, you said it ! pangaia Jan 2020 #58
Most of the migration has been done. The workers are back in their home villages/towns/cities. OAITW r.2.0 Jan 2020 #59
with a lethality rate of 4% lapfog_1 Jan 2020 #56
That's probably a projected lethality rate - the current actual rate is 2.77% Ms. Toad Jan 2020 #72
It's too early to say for sure what the mortality rate is. k2qb3 Jan 2020 #74
The number is based on confirmed deaths & confirmed infections. Ms. Toad Jan 2020 #81
It was calculated out of the first 1000 infections. lapfog_1 Jan 2020 #75
More likely because the newly infected (the last 1019 confirmed infections) Ms. Toad Jan 2020 #80
We're all gonna die!!! Initech Jan 2020 #57
I keep hoping The_jackalope Jan 2020 #68
This is how every zombie apocalypse movie starts DesertRat Jan 2020 #61
I hope trump I_UndergroundPanther Jan 2020 #62
one can bdamomma Jan 2020 #89
there was a movie a few years ago that was a what if & it was a bat habitat being invaded. pansypoo53219 Jan 2020 #63
i also recommend an older book i read. 'the coming plague'. pansypoo53219 Jan 2020 #64
That was a great book. Laurie Garrett I think? LiberalLoner Jan 2020 #65
Yes. A fantastic look into Ilsa Jan 2020 #67
more loss of anti-biotics. pansypoo53219 Jan 2020 #83
It's been 25 years, I think, since I read it. nt Ilsa Jan 2020 #85
I read that book in high school NickB79 Jan 2020 #70
Whatever the ChiComs greytdemocrat Jan 2020 #77

jimfields33

(15,807 posts)
1. Yieks!
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:50 PM
Jan 2020

Trump loves this. What easier way to close the borders completely. Stop all immigration. I bet next week he does this.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
3. That concept might not be so bad.... in and of itself...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:56 PM
Jan 2020

and if done correctly and with right intentions

China has stopped all public transportation between provinces...
But Carrie Lam refuses to close the Hong Kong border... Hong Kongers are furious !!!!




If this guy and his colleagues are right.... whoa....

maryellen99

(3,789 posts)
11. Isn't there a 2 week incubation period before showing symptoms?
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:14 PM
Jan 2020

I don’t think stopping immigration will make a difference.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
25. The Chinese doctor that got infected died in 9 days
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 03:45 PM
Jan 2020

They really dont know how many are infected, its China, so all estimates are iffy

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)
31. This and the fact that they are talking about supers spreaders,
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 04:01 PM
Jan 2020

(1 person, spreads to 14 people). This quickly could turn into a disaster, we are not prepared for.

bdamomma

(63,849 posts)
87. Never, I would never make DU look stupid.
Sun Jan 26, 2020, 02:25 PM
Jan 2020

with Miller and his Zero tolerance I wouldn't put anything pass them.

Didn't you hear they don't want pregnant mothers from other countries to have their babies inside of the US, because their children will become US citizens. Countries that were mentioned Russia and China.

Amishman

(5,557 posts)
60. That might actually be the best course of action
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 07:18 PM
Jan 2020

Assuming this thing really is an R value if 3.8 and a fatality rate around 3-5% (and that is a big if). Twice as communicable as influenza, several times deadlier, with no vaccinations or existing immunities. The 1918 flu pandemic had an R value of about 2 and a fatality rate of 2.5%. annual modern flu outbreaks (with our vaccination efforts) have an R value of less than 2 and a fatality rate of 0.1%

It would explain why China reacted immediately with the extreme action of quarantine of the entire city.

I had hoped and assumed this was just another scare, but it might really be extremely legitimately scary

 

rusty fender

(3,428 posts)
4. This is what eating bat guts will get you
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:58 PM
Jan 2020

Bats transmit 60+ diseases to humans. SARS? Yup, it was the consumption of fruit bats. Ebola? Yup. Marburg viruses? Yup.

Have the humans who eat bats learned nothing? Yup.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
5. interesting.... i have heard of it but
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:00 PM
Jan 2020

in my 5-6 trips to China-- all over.. I never ran into anybody eating bats. :&gt ) Of course that's rather anecdotal..

Arthur_Frain

(1,850 posts)
17. Libtards ate gay snakes that preyed upon pot smoking bats.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:25 PM
Jan 2020

The result was, of course, predictable, and entirely the libtards fault.

Arthur_Frain

(1,850 posts)
73. Sorry.
Sun Jan 26, 2020, 02:10 AM
Jan 2020

But I am. Really don’t think it’s necessary to put the “sarcasm” icon on there when it’s that far out there.

Arthur_Frain

(1,850 posts)
76. This news headline just flashed into my brain as I scrolled down through the replies.
Sun Jan 26, 2020, 02:20 AM
Jan 2020

I mean this is some really serious shit, this level of communicability. I hate that my first thought, after that, was “how is the orange turd going to try and spin this”.

Ms. Toad

(34,073 posts)
9. That's not where this came from.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:09 PM
Jan 2020

It probably came from eating snake meat.

Surprisingly, they found that the protein codes in the 2019-nCoV are most similar to those used in snakes.


Although it appears that, in this case, the snake may have eaten the bat.

Snakes often hunt for bats in wild. Reports indicate that snakes were sold in the local seafood market in Wuhan, raising the possibility that the 2019-nCoV might have jumped from the host species -- bats -- to snakes and then to humans at the beginning of this coronavirus outbreak.


https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/22/health/snakes-wuhan-coronavirus-outbreak-conversation-partner/index.html
 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
8. 56 million people quarantined over a few thousand infected? If it hits Beijing and Shanghai...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:06 PM
Jan 2020

....thats when the shit really hits the fan

Anybody seeing Mother Abigail?

spinbaby

(15,090 posts)
12. They're probably already infected.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:14 PM
Jan 2020

Do you really think you can quarantine a Chinese city of 11 million during the New Year holiday and not have a few people get out?

irisblue

(32,975 posts)
10. Well, if a Harvard Epidemiologist gets worried...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:12 PM
Jan 2020

His Twitter bio... "DrEricDing
Public health scientist👨🏻?🔬/ Epidemiologist / Health Economist / Science advocacy / Taught for 15 years at Harvard / NYT-featured pharma whistleblower
Virginia & Washington DCscholar.harvard.edu/ericdingJoined January 2009



This tweet, just past 1pm,eastern time, today


Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding (@DrEricDing) Tweeted:
UPDATE: Transmission of #coronoavirus estimated at 2.6 by another research group (lower than the 3.8 initial reports). But 2.6 is still extremely bad —each infected person will infect 2.6 others. Even the authors admit #CoronaOutbreak containment will be very difficult. Thread: https://t.co/Gg2vyIevL4


chowder66

(9,070 posts)
21. It means that those infected could infect 3.8 people. It's kind of like earthquake/tornado scales.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:35 PM
Jan 2020

If it goes up it's way more catastrophic.

On edit: it's at 2.5, the 3.8 was an initial estimate. Like an earthquake, it can first be estimated to be a 6.5 but actually was a 6.3 or less.

spinbaby

(15,090 posts)
16. Discussion of the research center is big on Twitter
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:22 PM
Jan 2020

Maybe a coincidence, maybe not. The news media seems bent on blaming the outbreak on Chinese people eating weird shit.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
35. right.. dumb ignorant media...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 04:32 PM
Jan 2020

brainwashed sheep when its time to eat.

"hey yoooo.. come ooon girls....come on girls....yeeey yoooo.."

That was my call when I took care of about 200 sheep....
really dumb animals..
But, that is their function in the world...

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
19. You'd think a bio-warfare agent release would have a death rate higher than the reported 3%
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:31 PM
Jan 2020

But its the Chinese, and I have heard reports it can be passed on through eye contact, so masks dont even help

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
37. Not really, one doctor that got infected said he wasn't wearing his goggles, that how he got it
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 04:37 PM
Jan 2020

Masks aren't enough, sprayed in the face from infected cough, you get it on your hands, rub your eyes, etc

My Pet Orangutan

(9,252 posts)
15. Irresponsible, reprehensible and wrong.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:20 PM
Jan 2020

Over the top alarmist language in response to an emerging, if urgent public health situation is irresponsible, and a blot on Dr Feigl-Ding's reputation.

The current R_0 estimate is 2.5. The R_0 of cited 3.8 was amongst the earliest (highly speculative) estimates. An R_0 of 2.5, is in line with the common flu.

Language like "themonuclear pandemic level bad" has no place in a public health discussion. He will be rightly be censured by his colleagues.

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
18. It's closer to 2.6 at the current estimate.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:26 PM
Jan 2020

With an uncertainty range of uncertainty range: 1.5-3.5.



Summary Report 3
Self-sustaining human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCov) is the only plausible explanation of the scale of the outbreak in Wuhan. We estimate that, on average, each case infected 2.6 (uncertainty range: 1.5-3.5) other people up to 18th January 2020, based on an analysis combining our past estimates of the size of the outbreak in Wuhan with computational modelling of potential epidemic trajectories. This implies that control measures need to block well over 60% of transmission to be effective in controlling the outbreak. It is likely, based on the experience of SARS and MERS-CoV, that the number of secondary cases caused by a case of 2019-nCoV is highly variable – with many cases causing no secondary infections, and a few causing many. Whether transmission is continuing at the same rate currently depends on the effectiveness of current control measures implemented in China and the extent to which the populations of affected areas have adopted risk-reducing behaviours. In the absence of antiviral drugs or vaccines, control relies upon the prompt detection and isolation of symptomatic cases. It is unclear at the current time whether this outbreak can be contained within China; uncertainties include the severity spectrum of the disease caused by this virus and whether cases with relatively mild symptoms are able to transmit the virus efficiently. Identification and testing of potential cases need to be as extensive as is permitted by healthcare and diagnostic testing capacity – including the identification, testing and isolation of suspected cases with only mild to moderate disease (e.g. influenza-like illness), when logistically feasible.


https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/news--wuhan-coronavirus/




If you're interested in following the epidemiology, The Lancet has made all their content on this virus free currently.

https://www.thelancet.com/coronavirus

https://twitter.com/TheLancet

My Pet Orangutan

(9,252 posts)
20. Yep. Dr. Feigl-Ding went full click-bait on one of the earliest (highly speculative) estimates.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:32 PM
Jan 2020

Reprehensible.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
38. Thanks....
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 04:37 PM
Jan 2020

I'm glad several people here have responded with more info...

I have 2 friends in Wuhan one of whom is in the USA now and debating whether to go back. He plays in the Wuhan Philharmonic...

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
69. Not dumb!
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 09:59 PM
Jan 2020

They've only just tightened it down even more. Just suggest to your friend to stay safe at this point.

Unless I were working in a capacity as to have an extradition team, I'd not enter Wuhan currently.

It's not good there at this moment.

mahina

(17,659 posts)
32. No ither source that I have access to could provide
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 04:03 PM
Jan 2020

The original article and then the informed discussion we find below. Thank you DU.

peggysue2

(10,829 posts)
47. Unusual to see a doctor spreading this sort message
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 05:48 PM
Jan 2020

The infection quotient has been reduced from what I understand, from the initial, alarming 3.8 to 2.6. Still worrisome, enough that we can't completely dismiss the danger.

Strange, too, that the other night I rewatched the movie Contagion with Gwyneth Paltrow (limited appearance since she turns out to be one of the first infected) and Matt Damon playing her husband. The movie provides a credible scenario of how one of these nasty viruses, once turning into pandemic strength, would be handled by the world's medical community, the political leadership and the public at large. Panic is the last thing you want to encourage, particularly early on although panic is what you're ultimately going to get if any communicable disease becomes widespread.

I wonder if the doctor's reaction is tied to the admitted apprehension in the medical community that a worldwide pandemic is not a question of if but when. Netflix is running a documentary now--Pandemic--expressing just that because of the incredible amount of traveling we do around the world. It makes containment really difficult and is why scientists are involved in world-wide monitoring, an attempt to identify unusual viral strains before they infect large populations.

In any case, I think it's wise to keep up on the developing stories. One tidbit I read indicated that infected individuals can show no viral symptoms for up to 3 weeks. This could be nasty.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
49. and with trumpo's cuts to everything good in the People's Republic of American States...?
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 05:54 PM
Jan 2020

What could possibly go wrong...?

peggysue2

(10,829 posts)
51. Exactly, pangaia
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 06:04 PM
Jan 2020

Trump is the worst sort of person to have in leadership in a true crisis. That being said, even if this is a false alarm, I could easily see Trump and his cronies closing down all our borders, using the virus as an excuse.

Without a doubt, he would capitalize on any ensuing panic and fear. Because it's what wanna-be dictators do.

He's as bad if not worse than the damn virus!

Snackshack

(2,541 posts)
53. Now that I understand.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 06:08 PM
Jan 2020

What the R0 value represents that is very alarming. Over the span of half a day yesterday of reading the reports on this this virus went from the quarantine of the one city in one region of China to encompass some 50million people in several countries. That is a pretty rapid progression.

OAITW r.2.0

(24,504 posts)
55. The timing could not have been worse, given Chinese New Year and the migration back to many
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 06:22 PM
Jan 2020

villages inside rural china. 100's of millions were on the move the past few days. This could be a nuclear level epidemic. Will China re-open transportation back to the factories in Guangdong Province and Shenzen? The social chaos could be staggering.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
58. Boy, you said it !
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 06:51 PM
Jan 2020


I think China has stopped public transportation between provinces...
which, of course, doesn;t stop people from traveling from Guangzhou or Shenzhen, for example, to anywhere else in Guangdong..

OAITW r.2.0

(24,504 posts)
59. Most of the migration has been done. The workers are back in their home villages/towns/cities.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 07:12 PM
Jan 2020

I think CNY was today, so now it's about the implications of returning. This will be a bigger story this week, I am sure.

lapfog_1

(29,205 posts)
56. with a lethality rate of 4%
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 06:32 PM
Jan 2020

if 1 billion people catch the virus around the planet... 40 Million may die.

And 1 billion isn't out of the question.

This is a huge pandemic possibility.

102 years after the Spanish Flu pandemic that infected 500M (1/3 of the world population) and killed at least 50M.

 

k2qb3

(374 posts)
74. It's too early to say for sure what the mortality rate is.
Sun Jan 26, 2020, 02:12 AM
Jan 2020

Not enough cases are resolved.

The death rate vs. documented recoveries is way higher than that, even if all the numbers we're getting from China were accurate.

Ms. Toad

(34,073 posts)
81. The number is based on confirmed deaths & confirmed infections.
Sun Jan 26, 2020, 02:41 AM
Jan 2020

That makes the death likely higher than 2.77 (since the more recent infections have not yet had time to die).

But yes - as there are more infections we will get a more accurate death rate.

lapfog_1

(29,205 posts)
75. It was calculated out of the first 1000 infections.
Sun Jan 26, 2020, 02:16 AM
Jan 2020

40 people died.

I suspect the reduced rate is due to early detection and treatment (to sustain the victim through the infection)

Ms. Toad

(34,073 posts)
80. More likely because the newly infected (the last 1019 confirmed infections)
Sun Jan 26, 2020, 02:39 AM
Jan 2020

have not yet had time to die.

The death rate on the first 1000 (presumably now post-infection) is likely more accurate.

The_jackalope

(1,660 posts)
68. I keep hoping
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:46 PM
Jan 2020

But it hasn't happened yet. Maybe the next one will do it.

The planet can only handle 10 million or so humans, so something will eventually come along and restore order.

pansypoo53219

(20,977 posts)
63. there was a movie a few years ago that was a what if & it was a bat habitat being invaded.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 07:47 PM
Jan 2020

contagion? was very good.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
67. Yes. A fantastic look into
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:27 PM
Jan 2020

The pandemic yet to come, perhaps very soon.

Between people consuming animals carrying pathogens, and permafrost melting releasing pathogens that we've never encountered before, I think we might be fucked.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»HOLY MOTHER OF GOD - the ...