General Discussion

kentuck

(111,104 posts) Sun Jan 26, 2020, 10:17 AM Jan 2020

Should the "Whistleblower" testify in front of the Senate?

Either in vocal disguise, or by pixelated video, or both?

Could he answer any questions?

How valuable could he be?

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should the "Whistleblower" testify in front of the Senate? (Original Post) kentuck Jan 2020 OP

Quid pro quo essaynnc Jan 2020 #1

No, the whistleblower is irrelevant. Those who kacekwl Jan 2020 #2

That is who is needed, you are correct. kentuck Jan 2020 #3

And that would be the end of whistleblowers. tavernier Jan 2020 #4

+1 crickets Jan 2020 #8

NO! ...nt 2naSalit Jan 2020 #5

Why? - No - So Trump Can Threaten The WB Like He Threatened Schiff This AM?.....nt global1 Jan 2020 #6

He already knows who the whistleblower is, would be my bet. kentuck Jan 2020 #7

Why have the Whistleblower to answer questions when you can have documents and actual participants UCmeNdc Jan 2020 #9

It would be funny if it was one of tRUMP's minions. WyattKansas Jan 2020 #10

No sinkingfeeling Jan 2020 #11

essaynnc

(801 posts)

1. Quid pro quo

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sun Jan 26, 2020, 10:24 AM

Jan 2020

What is Mitch willing to give up to get exactly what tRump has been begging for all along?? How about witnesses and evidence, Mitch?

kacekwl

(7,017 posts)

2. No, the whistleblower is irrelevant. Those who

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sun Jan 26, 2020, 10:24 AM

Jan 2020

need to testify are all the presidents men and women who have the 1st hand knowledge the criminal GOP claim they haven't heard from. And refuse to testify.

kentuck

(111,104 posts)

3. That is who is needed, you are correct.

Reply to kacekwl (Reply #2)

Sun Jan 26, 2020, 10:38 AM

Jan 2020

Is this an "all or nothing" deal? Better to have nothing?

I think the CJ should rule on it.

tavernier

(12,393 posts)

4. And that would be the end of whistleblowers.

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sun Jan 26, 2020, 10:42 AM

Jan 2020

Anonymous tips and information are just that. People risk their jobs, reputations and often lives by coming forward.

crickets

(25,981 posts)

8. +1

Reply to tavernier (Reply #4)

Sun Jan 26, 2020, 12:21 PM

Jan 2020

2naSalit

(86,650 posts)

5. NO! ...nt

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sun Jan 26, 2020, 10:55 AM

Jan 2020

global1

(25,253 posts)

6. Why? - No - So Trump Can Threaten The WB Like He Threatened Schiff This AM?.....nt

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sun Jan 26, 2020, 11:01 AM

Jan 2020

kentuck

(111,104 posts)

7. He already knows who the whistleblower is, would be my bet.

Reply to global1 (Reply #6)

Sun Jan 26, 2020, 11:05 AM

Jan 2020

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)

9. Why have the Whistleblower to answer questions when you can have documents and actual participants

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sun Jan 26, 2020, 12:25 PM

Jan 2020

available to provide the answer to any questions?

WyattKansas

(1,648 posts)

10. It would be funny if it was one of tRUMP's minions.

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sun Jan 26, 2020, 02:54 PM

Jan 2020

Funnier yet if it were Bolton.

sinkingfeeling

(51,461 posts)

11. No

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sun Jan 26, 2020, 02:54 PM

Jan 2020

Reply to this discussion