Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ashling

(25,771 posts)
Sun Jan 26, 2020, 03:51 PM Jan 2020

The actions were bad, but no impeachable

I am sick of hearing this.

I hear this type of semantics from Republican strategists as well as Democrats who should know better.


He has been impeached
thequestion about impeachability has already been answered

It has already been decided.

One could say "they were bad, but not convictable ... or not bad enough to convict.

But the fact is that the actions were and forever Impeachable.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The actions were bad, but no impeachable (Original Post) ashling Jan 2020 OP
I'm tired of it, too cyclonefence Jan 2020 #1
You nailed it. Different Drummer Jan 2020 #2
We should just call it what it really is.... kentuck Jan 2020 #3

cyclonefence

(4,483 posts)
1. I'm tired of it, too
Sun Jan 26, 2020, 05:05 PM
Jan 2020

He has been impeached. Forever. That can never be erased, no matter what happens in the Senate.

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
3. We should just call it what it really is....
Sun Jan 26, 2020, 05:22 PM
Jan 2020

Treason.

It's in the Constitution.

But, it would make no difference.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The actions were bad, but...