General Discussion

jayschool2013

(2,313 posts) Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:07 PM Jan 2020

Mulvaney issues a statement

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mulvaney's lawyer has issued a statement on Bolton's book. h/t <a href="https://twitter.com/meridithmcgraw?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@meridithmcgraw</a> <a href="https://t.co/bTWlNHb8gX">pic.twitter.com/bTWlNHb8gX</a></p>— Natasha Bertrand (@NatashaBertrand) <a href="

Link to tweet

?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 27, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mulvaney issues a statement (Original Post) jayschool2013 Jan 2020 OP

Mick sounds nervous. MontanaMama Jan 2020 #1

Ah - The Old "I Have No Recollection Of Any Conversation' Excuse.....nt global1 Jan 2020 #2

My favorite response so far on Twitter jayschool2013 Jan 2020 #3

There aren't enough Ass Covers to go around. C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #4

Definitely... kentuck Jan 2020 #5

They're eating one another. It's in their DNA. nolabear Jan 2020 #6

Yes it is. There was never any doubt it would Phoenix61 Jan 2020 #11

Thanks... MoonlitKnight Jan 2020 #7

ALL Rethugs famous words bluestarone Jan 2020 #8

Gosh, how to get to the bottom of this? Wait ... I've got an idea. 11 Bravo Jan 2020 #9

Exactly. If Mick wants to clear his name, he should testify under oath and penalty of perjury. Midnight Writer Jan 2020 #17

Run Away Submariner Jan 2020 #10

Lol! happybird Jan 2020 #14

Get over it, Mulvaney! Many more to come. Just sayin'. Frustratedlady Jan 2020 #12

Guess he should testify to that effect then Roland99 Jan 2020 #13

This is why we need sworn testimony nt Sunsky Jan 2020 #15

Didn't happen, didn't happen, can't remember if it happened. nt chowder66 Jan 2020 #16

And we were afraid there's be no witnesses, or testimony! lindysalsagal Jan 2020 #18

Don't you lie to me struggle4progress Jan 2020 #19

Sooooo then... GET HIM UNDER OATH! Still In Wisconsin Jan 2020 #20

For the record, he's on record saying of course there was quid pro quo on live TV Johonny Jan 2020 #21

MontanaMama

(23,337 posts)

1. Mick sounds nervous.

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:09 PM

Jan 2020

Wonder why?

global1

(25,270 posts)

2. Ah - The Old "I Have No Recollection Of Any Conversation' Excuse.....nt

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:10 PM

Jan 2020

jayschool2013

(2,313 posts)

3. My favorite response so far on Twitter

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:10 PM

Jan 2020

C_U_L8R

(45,020 posts)

4. There aren't enough Ass Covers to go around.

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:11 PM

Jan 2020

They're going down.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)

5. Definitely...

Reply to C_U_L8R (Reply #4)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:13 PM

Jan 2020

Covering his ass.

nolabear

(41,991 posts)

6. They're eating one another. It's in their DNA.

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:14 PM

Jan 2020

Phoenix61

(17,018 posts)

11. Yes it is. There was never any doubt it would

Reply to nolabear (Reply #6)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:24 PM

Jan 2020

come down to this. If you apply enough pressure to a bunch of sniveling cowards they always turn in each other.

MoonlitKnight

(1,584 posts)

7. Thanks...

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:15 PM

Jan 2020

For further waiving privilege.

bluestarone

(17,028 posts)

8. ALL Rethugs famous words

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:18 PM

Jan 2020

No recollection!

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)

9. Gosh, how to get to the bottom of this? Wait ... I've got an idea.

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:20 PM

Jan 2020

Put them both under oath. What do you say, Mick?

Midnight Writer

(21,795 posts)

17. Exactly. If Mick wants to clear his name, he should testify under oath and penalty of perjury.

Reply to 11 Bravo (Reply #9)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 04:10 PM

Jan 2020

Of course, in GOP Land, testifying under oath is by definition a "perjury trap".

Submariner

(12,509 posts)

10. Run Away

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:22 PM

Jan 2020

[link:

happybird

(4,622 posts)

14. Lol!

Reply to Submariner (Reply #10)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:47 PM

Jan 2020

Perfect.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)

12. Get over it, Mulvaney! Many more to come. Just sayin'.

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:30 PM

Jan 2020

Roland99

(53,342 posts)

13. Guess he should testify to that effect then

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:32 PM

Jan 2020

UNDER OATH

Sunsky

(1,737 posts)

15. This is why we need sworn testimony nt

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 02:55 PM

Jan 2020

chowder66

(9,077 posts)

16. Didn't happen, didn't happen, can't remember if it happened. nt

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 03:06 PM

Jan 2020

lindysalsagal

(20,727 posts)

18. And we were afraid there's be no witnesses, or testimony!

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 07:31 PM

Jan 2020

When the gangster's shit-bombs start exploding, the scum will run for cover. And it will be a stampede.

struggle4progress

(118,334 posts)

19. Don't you lie to me

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 07:42 PM

Jan 2020

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)

20. Sooooo then... GET HIM UNDER OATH!

Reply to jayschool2013 (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 07:43 PM

Jan 2020

Of course, they won't do that because Micky's lame version of events would be blown out of the water.

Johonny

(20,883 posts)

21. For the record, he's on record saying of course there was quid pro quo on live TV