Unfair, I tell you.

no truth no facts.

Pounding.

I only recall the likes of Devin (Chalupa!!!) Nunes and Gym (shorts but no jacket) Jordan doing some yelling. Oh heavens, can’t forget Doug (this chair sucks) Collins as either!

They are so flipping hypocritical.

Solomon guy from The Hill

How about defending Fat Bastard, who is the actual subject here? Oh, wait! You can't.

She quotes Volker saying he thought Giuliani was pursuing his own ends, not those of our pure leader.

Will she mention all this evidence he claims (and was already ) supposed to have been made public on Biden illegal activity???!

I got your context right here.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-and-friends-desperately-tries-to-end-rudy-giuliani-interview-repeatedly-fails

As Trumps personal lawyer was investigating foreign investigation in Ukraine. Is that what a personal layer does?
Guiliani is anything but sparkly, BTW

(as they make it up)

who this charismatic, dynamic powerhouse reminds me of. I think it was Ed Sullivan's assistant in the movie "The Doors."

I am only somewhat familiar with him, by reputation. But my impression is that he was honest, and could be trusted around children.

He is speaking slowly and deliberately.

That was some ministry of truth shit.

Lays waste to truth through his powers of monotone voice.

The courts did NOT tell the House HOW to do their business.

NO. Committees do NOT have to have the full House vote on a subpoena.

The House had no recourse to a special investigator, and so had to do its own investigations. Witnesses were deposed behind closed doors to keep them from lining up their stories. Both parties were allowed to be present as members of appropriate committees, and the witnesses all had access to counsel. Of course the president was excluded. This was not the time for any of the other BS he's talking about and this earnest little jackhole knows that.

Blatant lies like this ought to get you censured for ethics violations at the very least.

[and again, the main argument is just, 'unfair!!']

They keep repeating this same defense to make sure all of Trump’s base hears it at some point.

Guess since it’s Roberts’ birthday, he’s going to give the defense a break on lies in a court room.

This is beyond nonsensical.

It takes a special talent to bulldoze this many lies at the people. Certainly no conscience there.

of Nadler.

I was surprised too. I didn't realize he was that heavy in the past.

Nadler has lost quite a bit of weight over the past couple years.

I was up and down from the tv when that came up. Was really wanting to rip on scalia. I’m gonna take a five minute break to eh, try to sync back in. Thanks for clearing that up.

You can see he still has a bit of weight around his mid section. But, man thats a big difference.

Good for him, he might have lengthened his life by losing that much.

BumRushDaShow, you should get a medal for putting yourself through the lies.

for calling witnesses - right?

I don't know this, can some one tell me how Trump was "locked out?"

Period

it's all

It's surreal.

um... you got your due process right here and now, please proceed!

sad.

handle an impeachment investigation?

Since when does the Office of Legal Counsel get to make up new rules about who can and cannot ignore a subpoena? [This one's rhetorical. Kinda.]

In other words, a "dictatorship".

Even an asshole of a lawyer should understand "sole power of impeachment" and "may determine the rules of its proceedings".

to completely destroy these idiots.

They are truly doing a disservice to all the history, government, and legal teaching community who will have to do a Yoda on the students when trying to explain this bullshit that is going on right now -

On the other hand, what better teaching aid than tearing apart this bull patooty?

Go look up the past precedent and the (bullshit) "theories" that were proffered today, and compare and contrast.

to repeat this argument back.

good job, evil Bill Nye, the lying guy

THAT is the problem here.

Ordering NO ONE to testify is NOT the same as "asserting Executive Privilege".

May I assume he didn’t mean Bolton?

during the House investigation

and in the end I am sure it will, the problem is will it happen soon enough?

YES agency lawyers are there to advise employees about what they can and cannot discuss when it comes to a hearing (factoring in any "Executive Privilege". We see HUNDREDS of hearings every year where you see this.

But again, the PROBLEM here is that not only was Executive Privilege NOT invoked, but ALL employees were "ordered" not to "testify" AT ALL. So baffling people with bullshit about "agency lawyers" is just filler for something that does not apply.

"You can't punish meeee! It's not allowed!"

Wacky.

That was the date of Washington's farewell address, not the founding, (1776 declaration/1783 independence) so I think somebody got his dates mixed up.

YES DUMBASS - For ITS role. THAT is what "CHECK AND BALANCE" means. THAT branch was ALSO "Article I" - THE FIRST. And the Executive was Article II (to make it plain that the PEOPLE were primary) and not to encourage a monarch.

on the screen about separation of powers and encroachment, and I do not even want to read whatever nonsense is in the closed captions. I think I need a nap.

Are they just racking up billable hours or what? They ought to know by now they won't get paid anyway.

they are actually making shit up - past precedent, Supreme Court decisions, purported "rights" of the President. . :googly

What the heck is he there for? He's like a paperweight that breathes.

It was patterned after one but in the case of impeachment, the Chief Justice is there more as a symbolic "impartial judge" to shepherd the process along, replacing the Senate Pro-Tempore (Grassley) in that role, and acting as a "working observer" of the dispute between the Executive and the Legislative.

They are making stuff up. Ordering employees "not to comply with Congressional subpoenas" is NOT "invoking Executive Privilege". It is OBSTRUCTION.

cause it was drowning out mine!!

Today is just next level insulting. These are supposed to be real attorneys?

"What's she doing to me? This won't help the ratings! Where's the cleavage? the legs? She's supposed to be the Fox host here!"

just for going to court.

Nice try.

Holy shit.. never heard her before, only about her..
My god is she stupid !!!

Can barely read.....

She can count all the way up to 25,000.

She got a 20k bribe to back out of a Trump University investigation when she was Florida AG.

is she wearing a steel pan scrubber?

but brillo at least does its job, and well .....

Nailed it.

how is that relevant?

Waiting with bated breath.

It isn't relevant, but she's gonna try her best to be a team player and make it relevant for *checks clock* about another hour or so.

Just listening in my car shooting down lie after lie

he raised eyebrows.

break because at 4PM, local news, Ellen and syndicated court shows were on here.

any of Trump's actions.