Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump lawyer: Foreign intervention into election can be considered in the nations interest
Link to tweet
?s=21
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 1166 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump lawyer: Foreign intervention into election can be considered in the nations interest (Original Post)
RandySF
Jan 2020
OP
Please don't give Donny-shit-for-brains any ideas about being the re-incarnation of Louis XIV.
alwaysinasnit
Jan 2020
#7
Wasn't this act literally the reason the founders finally put impeachment into the constitution?
Beaverhausen
Jan 2020
#10
"You can't impeach me for having Dershowitz drawn and quartered on the National Mall!
struggle4progress
Jan 2020
#11
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,732 posts)1. Put the bong down and step away, Alan...
djg21
(1,803 posts)2. What nation's best interest?
Dershowitz is a self-important tool who will do anything to stay relevant. Russias interests dont matter for purposes of this discussion.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,732 posts)3. Douchowitz is making the insane argument that
encouraging foreign intervention in a US election to help Trump get re-elected is in the national interest because Trump thinks it's in the national interest. L'etat c'est moi and all that.
alwaysinasnit
(5,066 posts)7. Please don't give Donny-shit-for-brains any ideas about being the re-incarnation of Louis XIV.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)4. Trump is already arguing that he deserves a third term.
He says all the investigations have cut into his golf time, uh, executive time, uh, rally time...
Different Drummer
(7,621 posts)6. Something called the U.S. Constitution says otherwise.
DD
madinmaryland
(64,933 posts)8. The constitution still exists? Who knew!
Different Drummer
(7,621 posts)9. I think we're witnessing the end of its life, sadly.
DD
Different Drummer
(7,621 posts)5. Don't know where Dershowitz gets such nonsense.
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)10. Wasn't this act literally the reason the founders finally put impeachment into the constitution?
https://www.npr.org/2019/06/14/732571895/fear-of-foreign-interference-in-u-s-elections-dates-from-nations-founding
The founders of American democracy could not have anticipated the technology of the 21st century or many of the other changes that have redefined the republic they created. But they clearly foresaw one challenge that faces the inheritors of their handiwork the threat of foreign interference in our elections.
The fear of foreign interference was a driving issue in the conversations of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787. Several features of the Constitution that the framers produced that summer had their origins in this fear, as former Federal Election Commission Chairman Trevor Potter noted in a 2017 speech.
Potter, now president of the Campaign Legal Center, said, "The founders took steps to guard against such [interference] by including in our Constitution guardrails like the requirement that the president be a 'natural born citizen.'
The founders of American democracy could not have anticipated the technology of the 21st century or many of the other changes that have redefined the republic they created. But they clearly foresaw one challenge that faces the inheritors of their handiwork the threat of foreign interference in our elections.
The fear of foreign interference was a driving issue in the conversations of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787. Several features of the Constitution that the framers produced that summer had their origins in this fear, as former Federal Election Commission Chairman Trevor Potter noted in a 2017 speech.
Potter, now president of the Campaign Legal Center, said, "The founders took steps to guard against such [interference] by including in our Constitution guardrails like the requirement that the president be a 'natural born citizen.'
struggle4progress
(118,293 posts)11. "You can't impeach me for having Dershowitz drawn and quartered on the National Mall!
Our campaign modeling suggested I could win some votes by doing that, so it was in the national interest! I only did it to improve my chances of re-election! "
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)12. Also, slavery is freedom, truth is ignorance.
DFW
(54,403 posts)13. Dershowitz would have claimed that John Wilkes Booth acted in the nation's interest, too.
And therefore deserved at the worst censure and six months probation..........
coti
(4,612 posts)14. No, Alan. That destroys people's faith in elections and our democracy.
It's not ok. At all.