General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDNC disses teachers
Democrats' week in Charlotte began with the screening of an anti-teachers union movie and never got much friendlier
At last weeks GOP convention, Chris Christie served up some juicy red meat: They believe in teachers unions. We believe in teachers. Of course, if Republicans believe in teachers, they have a strange way of showing it: slashing their jobs while trampling their bargaining rights. But as for Democrats supposed faith in teachers unions, this week showed once again that the party could more fairly be described as agnostic at best.
The weeks first slight to teachers unions came Monday, before the convention had even kicked off. Convention Chairman Antonio Villaraigosa spoke at a special screening of the upcoming Hollywood film Wont Back Down for DNC delegates. He was joined by fellow Democratic mayors Cory Booker and Kevin Johnson, top union antagonist Michelle Rhee, and the director of Parent Revolution, a group pushing for parent trigger. The film is a sympathetic fictional portrayal of trigger, a policy which creates a mechanism for replacing union public schools with non-union charters, based on signatures from parents. American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten recently wrote that the film has egregiously misleading scenes which depict a union preventing teachers from working past 3 PM and protecting a teacher who punishes kids by putting them in the closet.
As Ive previously reported, parent trigger has widespread support from Democratic mayors, none more vocal or prominent than Los Angeles Villaraigosa. While the screening was not listed as an official convention event, the Huffington Posts Jon Ward reported that the Obama Administration was asked for permission to hold the event in Charlotte, and deferred the decision to the DNCs political director, who raised no objections.
more . . . http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/dnc_disses_teachers/
dsc
(52,166 posts)unions were not exactly given the red carpet treatment. As a gay man, this convention was the most inclusive of me of any in history, as a teacher, not so much.
patrice
(47,992 posts)What's the difference between the two: RttT & NCLB?
Pardon my ignorance on the matter; I'm just trying to ascertain why the parent trigger is considered to be such a good idea.
If the whole thing is really only about being responsible for the test scores, what's the point of:
Principals, if theyre going to be responsible for the test scores, they have to be able to choose their starting line-up.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)more qualitative traits, not just quantitative aspects. I'm interested in the standards and how they are implemented.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)states can compete for.
but to "win" they need to implement conditions in their district that close & charterize schools & get rid of teachers faster than NCLB did.
Many states changed their policies to make their applications more competitive. For instance, Illinois lifted a cap on the number of charter schools it allows; Massachusetts made it easier for students in low-performing schools to switch to charters, and West Virginia proposed a merit pay system that includes student achievement in its compensation calculations. In order to be eligible, states had to use value-added modeling in teacher evaluations. Some states had banned value-added modeling, but changed their laws to be eligible.
Race to the Top prompted 48 states to adopt common standards for K-12. Adoption was accelerated by the August 1, 2010 deadline for adopting common standards, after which states would not receive points toward round 2 applications. In addition, the White House announced a $350 million federal grant funding the development of assessments aligned to the common standards. The common standards were developed by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers with funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation and others.[7]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_to_the_Top
They're just using $$$$ as a big carrot to get states to implement the education deform agenda. And by in large, they are. It's really machiavellian.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Principals in my district are favoring TFAs over experienced veterans for leadership roles and other assignments. It's just another way to force out older (more experienced) teachers.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)By Beau Yarbrough, Staff Writersbsun.com
Posted: 08/29/2012 06:18:06 PM PDT
ADELANTO - A group representing parents at a High Desert elementary school returned to court this week in their ongoing war with a school district they accuse of failing their children.
A lawyer representing the Desert Trails Parent Union filed a motion Tuesday to compel the Adelanto Elementary School District to comply with a judge's ruling earlier this summer. Three-fourths of students at Desert Trails Elementary cannot read or write, according to statewide testing scores.
In July, the group became the first to successfully use the state's 2010 "parent trigger" law, which allows parents to force sweeping changes at failing schools, if they can gather signatures from 50 percent or more of students' parents or guardians.
Earlier this month, the Adelanto district's School Board, which had previously sought to disqualify some petition signatures, complied with Judge Steve Malone's order, and accepted the signatures he had ordered them to. But the School Board voted to give the parent group only an advisory role in the future of Desert Trails, rather than letting them turn it into a charter school in the 2012-13 school year, as they had sought to do. The board claimed their decision was within their authority under the parent trigger law.
http://www.redlandsdailyfacts.com/sanbernardinocounty/ci_21430145/adelanto-parents-group-school-district-head-back-court
This is an extreme case, to be sure, but is it possible that a little fresh blood might help.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)the school board is attempting to side-step a parental move to take charter proposals. It's too late for this year, but the parents are looking to have the schools taken over by next year:
By Beau Yarbrough, Staff Writersbsun.com
Posted: 08/29/2012 06:18:06 PM PDT
ADELANTO - A group representing parents at a High Desert elementary school returned to court this week in their ongoing war with a school district they accuse of failing their children.
A lawyer representing the Desert Trails Parent Union filed a motion Tuesday to compel the Adelanto Elementary School District to comply with a judge's ruling earlier this summer. Three-fourths of students at Desert Trails Elementary cannot read or write, according to statewide testing scores.
In July, the group became the first to successfully use the state's 2010 "parent trigger" law, which allows parents to force sweeping changes at failing schools, if they can gather signatures from 50 percent or more of students' parents or guardians.
Earlier this month, the Adelanto district's School Board, which had previously sought to disqualify some petition signatures, complied with Judge Steve Malone's order, and accepted the signatures he had ordered them to. But the School Board voted to give the parent group only an advisory role in the future of Desert Trails, rather than letting them turn it into a charter school in the 2012-13 school year, as they had sought to do. The board claimed their decision was within their authority under the parent trigger law.
http://www.redlandsdailyfacts.com/sanbernardinocounty/ci_21430145/adelanto-parents-group-school-district-head-back-court
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/03/opinion/la-oe-newton-adelanto-desert-trails-20120903
http://www.sbsun.com/news/ci_21493959/embattled-adelanto-superintendent-resigns
Kirkland & Ellis is representing the parents. They used to employ Ken Starr, but are also one of the finest pro bono shops for death penalty appellate practice.
There's currently moves in other school districts, but as this is pretty nascent, I don't really have an opinion on it. But I do know that if I was in a district with Adelanto's numbers, I would try to do something.
standingtall
(2,787 posts)Disgust me. My understanding is before he was Mayor he was an organizer for the teachers Union. Then he gets elect Mayor, and decides he is an employee of the Union busting consultant firm know as corporate America, or maybe the Republican party. Repigs have been vilifying teachers for over 30 years, and now so called democrats have joined them. I am sick of the treatment of those who work in the educational system by our politicians. I hope one day every public school teacher in country goes on a national strike.
catchnrelease
(1,945 posts)I retired from the city of LA after 30 yrs, (not in education) and I can vouch for the fact that he is a phony slime ball. You could always bet that if there was going to be a camera around, he would show up to get his mug in front of it. A disgusting self-promoter if there ever was one. I can't imagine he would ever do anything to actually benefit the city or it's residents in anyway unless he was going to get something out of it. I pray that he'll never have a chance at the governorship of CA or any other governmental position.