In essence, I agree. Sooner or later, though, our big internet-tech companies are going to have to fall under the "common carrier" doctrine, and then they will be subject to judicial review as quasi-government agencies. No telling how long that will take.



Thanks for posting.

-Laelth

I know a RWer posted a Prager U video "debunking" the party flip on racism and the Southern Strategy on another board recently, so I get the idea that Prager U is a RW propaganda mill. Am I wrong?

password indicates very strongly that it's a Public Forum, and therefore the courts decision is wrong.
The rest of it I'm not prepared to comment on.

agents of the government. The court is saying that they are privately owned.

Had they been considered public in the government sense, then 1A would have applied. They'd have to allow all content. Being private, they can cull videos or content as they see fit.