General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe unfortunate reality with the coronoa is that people have more chances to be infected
in crowded heavily populated places, more along the coasts, less in rural area. Yes, in Trump country.
appalachiablue
(41,168 posts)population and diseases-- the down side. During plagues people who had money or contacts fled to the countryside, it's healthier. Poorer folks had to remain in the cities. The Renaissance and then industrialization had a lot to do with the growth of cities.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)During the bubonic plague, rich people decamped to isolated areas. The cities of that era, which had piles of garbage and other unclean stuff, were over-run with sick people.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)We have crap healthcare in the Trump worshiping areas and less healthcare insurance. So, if it does manage to hit some of the smaller rural areas, it might still affect them.
question everything
(47,518 posts)Wouldn't it be nice if, instead of pumping funds into the military and into his bodies he would have invested in attracting medical facilities and workers to rural area?
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Instead, they put more money into hurting people. Ever notice the budget is not a big issue when it comes to tax cuts and wars? They never say a word about the budget then. You will never hear Congress say we can't afford more bombs. It's backwards from what it should be.
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)Remote pacific islands. Its going to get there. Especially if the resident get together every Sunday morning.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)It is likely already there. If is just a matter of transmission speed, they tend to have fewer people interactions per day than a city person.