Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 05:42 AM Sep 2012

The Ryan Sinkhole

This is a long, detailed and breathtaking article. I highly recommend reading it in its entirety. Here's someone who's done his homework- even if he's not a journalist but professor of journalism and author.

By THOMAS B. EDSALL

Unlike the Republican platform, which has mostly been ignored outside of the abortion issue, the Paul Ryan budget is the core document of the 2012 campaign. It is the most explicit expression of the Republican agenda, endorsed by the party’s presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, and backed by decisive majorities of House and Senate Republicans.

That much is known. What people have not been talking about enough is that the Ryan budget contains an $897 billion sinkhole: massive but unexplained cuts in such discretionary domestic programs as education, food and drug inspection, workplace safety, environmental protection and law enforcement.

The scope of the cuts – stunning in their breadth — is hidden. To find the numbers, turn to page 16 of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget – Fiscal Year 2013. In Table 2, Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Resolution Discretionary Spending, in the far right hand column, you’ll see the nearly $897 billion figure, which appears on the line marked “BA” for Budget Authority under Allowances (920) as $896,884 (because these figures are listed in millions of dollars).

<snip>

“The Ryan budget will kill everybody,” said Aura-Lee Nicodemus, another woman I met, who works at the V.A. Medical Center in White River Junction, Vt. and is active in the advocacy organization, Disabled American Veterans. “I’m a registered Republican and I can’t vote for Romney. His actions speak louder than words.”

<snip>

http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/09/edsall-the-ryan-sinkhole/

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Ryan Sinkhole (Original Post) cali Sep 2012 OP
kick bigtree Sep 2012 #1
I made a copy of the article to read later . . . Vinca Sep 2012 #2
tmi Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2012 #4
Heh heh. Right you are. Chorophyll Sep 2012 #5
I read it and then made a copy for my file on the 2012 election. JDPriestly Sep 2012 #12
this is interesting. What struck me most is the conscience decision to not explain details Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2012 #3
yes, and the decision not to reveal what loopholes they'd cut cali Sep 2012 #7
First they hide Romney's tax returns; then they hide their proposed budget cuts. JDPriestly Sep 2012 #13
K&R!! spread the word!! hue Sep 2012 #6
K & R AzDar Sep 2012 #8
rec'd barbtries Sep 2012 #9
people should learn about this...if people know the truth, Romney/Ryan can't win Douglas Carpenter Sep 2012 #10
Spread it far and wide! MoonRiver Sep 2012 #11
kick. this may be the most informative piece you read this week. cali Sep 2012 #14
Let's hope these "registered Republicans" BumRushDaShow Sep 2012 #15
kick G_j Sep 2012 #16

Vinca

(50,271 posts)
2. I made a copy of the article to read later . . .
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 07:45 AM
Sep 2012

in the bathroom. Ryan/Romney makes for good bathroom reading.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
12. I read it and then made a copy for my file on the 2012 election.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:04 AM
Sep 2012

This article deserves to be read more than once.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
3. this is interesting. What struck me most is the conscience decision to not explain details
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 08:07 AM
Sep 2012

of cuts. Like they calculated the damage if they did and decided that hiding the details would be less harmful, politically. what does this remind you of? the decision to hide Romney's tax returns.

Bet, Romney's hands are all over this. It's a pattern of obfuscation. He probably learned this at Bain. Months and years of hiding their real purpose from workers at the companies Bain took over - to gouge and pillage - not to save their future.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
7. yes, and the decision not to reveal what loopholes they'd cut
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 08:19 AM
Sep 2012

for high income folks.

It is indeed a pattern of obfuscation and I suspect he learned this far before Bain.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
13. First they hide Romney's tax returns; then they hide their proposed budget cuts.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:08 AM
Sep 2012

Mark my words (and those of the author of this article, Thomas B. Edsell). “Function 920 allowances” will be a household word by November 6.

BumRushDaShow

(128,968 posts)
15. Let's hope these "registered Republicans"
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 11:55 AM
Sep 2012

also remember to throw their "Republican" thug congresscritters out too.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Ryan Sinkhole