Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

milestogo

(16,829 posts) Sun Mar 22, 2020, 01:40 PM Mar 2020

Trump IS a war president. We've been at war with him for over three years.

This has been the most psychically exhausting presidency of my lifetime. And just when you think it can't get any worse or more dangerous, it does.

It has to end.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump IS a war president. We've been at war with him for over three years. (Original Post) milestogo Mar 2020 OP

Can a draft dodger be a "War President"? Champp Mar 2020 #1

And he's been at war with us. Lindsay Mar 2020 #2

I think part of his 2naSalit Mar 2020 #3

I mean, we're also still in two actual wars, you know? (nt) Recursion Mar 2020 #4

Champp

(2,114 posts)

1. Can a draft dodger be a "War President"?

Reply to milestogo (Original post)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 01:43 PM

Mar 2020

Republicans have a sick sense of what honor really means.

Lindsay

(3,276 posts)

2. And he's been at war with us.

Reply to milestogo (Original post)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 01:44 PM

Mar 2020

Anybody who is not a worshiper is The Enemy to Trump.

2naSalit

(86,647 posts)

3. I think part of his

Reply to milestogo (Original post)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 02:59 PM

Mar 2020

hesitancy has to do with revenge for his impeachment. We impeached him and now many of us can die because he was disgraced... we must pay the price.

I hope most of his enablers get sick by the time early November rolls around.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)

4. I mean, we're also still in two actual wars, you know? (nt)

Reply to milestogo (Original post)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 03:24 PM

Mar 2020

Reply to this discussion