General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLiberty University Could Face Liability for Failure to Shut Down for Coronavirus
The public health crisis created by the novel coronavirus has spun off myriad related problemsmost notably, the accelerating collapse of the national economy. One story thats not gotten the attention it deserves, though, is what will happen to those who acted irresponsibly during this challenging period. After were past the crisis stage of this pandemic, we could see a flurry of court cases on behalf of those sickened or killed through exposures that could have been avoided. To take one dramatic example: What if, for instance, an employer places workers at risk of infection by ordering them to work on-site when there are other, safer alternatives available?
Jerry Falwell Jr., the president of Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia, may find himself an unwilling participant in answering that question. In contrast to the approach taken by most universitiessend everyone home and move to an online programFalwell has welcomed students returning from spring break and initially told the faculty to return to campus unless they had a sound medical reason to stay away. Although they will now teach online rather than in front of classes, many instructors remain on campus. Those who do, of course, might need to travel to and from their offices, in apparent defiance of Virginia Gov. Ralph Northams order for nonessential businesses to shut down. Falwell and those who follow a similar path have set themselves up for possible negligence lawsuits.
Placing people in a dangerous position is the kind of carelesseven recklessbehavior that fills first-year torts casebooks. Universities can be liable for failing to safeguard the health and safety of their students and for coercing their employees (faculty and staff) to assume needless risks. While the risk of COVID-19 infection is unavoidable for hospital employees during this pandemic (even if reasonable sanitation measures are followed), theres no sound reason for a university to defy sensible public health directives by encouraging faculty and students to return to campus. (This is especially true since this return is taking place right after spring break, when its a sure thing that at least some students were congregating in massive, unsafe numbers.) Such defiance of public health messaging, as well as the contrary decisions of seemingly all other institutions of higher learning, could add up to compelling evidence of negligent conductfailing to act like a reasonable person under the circumstances. And a jury that got its hands on such a case might even find that Falwells conduct went beyond negligence and was recklessmeaning that it could find that he consciously disregarded a known risk. If so, Falwell and Liberty University could be saddled with punitive damages too, because Virginia, like most states, allows punitive damages for cases involving reckless conduct (but not mere negligence). Other employers who present their workers with such choices could be similarly called to account.
Public officials might also be sued for placing people in danger, but these cases are much tougher to win. First, theres the obstacle of governmental immunity, which rules out some lawsuits against the government from the start and makes others difficult. For instance, the president could not be successfully sued for failing to invoke the Defense Production Act because thats considered a matter of policyand such discretionary acts arent amenable to suit. But if the act were invoked, and then some simple, negligent act by the government prevented a life-saving treatment from reaching a hospital, the victims might be able to sue under the Federal Tort Claims Act. State law is no less bewildering, in part because each state has its own statute that describes the circumstances (if any) under which the state and its governmental divisions (including localities) can be sued. For instance, the resistance by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to ordering a statewide shutdown will predictably increase incidence of COVID-19 infection, but anyone trying to sue the state government for this would have to face a withering gantlet of restrictions imposed by the Florida tort statuteand would likely lose. (The statute contains many exceptions to liability and imposes a damages cap, among many other limitations.)
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/03/liberty-university-coronavirus-shutdown-liability.html?__twitter_impression=true
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)The hard right majority will find some way to make this a religious freedom issue.