Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I was tested for the virus on March 17. I just heard TODAY that (Original Post) patricia92243 Mar 2020 OP
That's great news! Ohiogal Mar 2020 #1
That's good news gratuitous Mar 2020 #2
Fantastic news !!! HotTeaBag Mar 2020 #3
Lets me know that the figures they are quoting are seriously patricia92243 Mar 2020 #5
Didn't kiss enough ass? Brainfodder Mar 2020 #4
I always thought it strange everybody yelling about testing.. What about "resuting"? mitch96 Mar 2020 #6
Abbott Laboratories has developed new 5-13 minute test frazzled Mar 2020 #7
That's great news. The test with no results is pretty useless. patricia92243 Mar 2020 #10
+1000 smirkymonkey Mar 2020 #30
A friend of mine in her 70s was tested 12 days ago. cwydro Mar 2020 #8
I wish everyone could have your result. Stay well, so happy for you! BeckyDem Mar 2020 #9
Good news!!! DarthDem Mar 2020 #11
unfortunately, it took 2 weeks, and now you need to be tested again 0rganism Mar 2020 #12
... zackymilly Mar 2020 #20
Actually, I'm still sick - no fever now but still the cough and runny patricia92243 Mar 2020 #24
PHEW malaise Mar 2020 #13
I am happy for you. Doreen Mar 2020 #14
There is a 40% false negative from the tests. My friend learned the hard way. SunSeeker Mar 2020 #15
That's what I've been wondering about "false negatives" Rorey Mar 2020 #26
What good news! Lonestarblue Mar 2020 #16
I have a relative who was tested Mr.Bill Mar 2020 #17
I had a fever at the end of February before the wide area warnings. rickford66 Mar 2020 #18
I'm so glad you don't have the virus sdfernando Mar 2020 #19
Thank goodness sarge43 Mar 2020 #21
My sister had to be tested last week Raftergirl Mar 2020 #22
Thank heaven! Now the steps you took to protect others from you can also protect you from them. Mister Ed Mar 2020 #23
This Raftergirl Mar 2020 #27
Sorry to rain on your parade dickthegrouch Mar 2020 #25
Congrats! Now you have to stay put... stillcool Mar 2020 #28
SIL had test Friday - got positive result this AM. jmg257 Mar 2020 #29
Good news for you bdamomma Mar 2020 #31

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
2. That's good news
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 11:23 AM
Mar 2020

I hope everyone keeps in mind that news of new infections breaking today were first incubated two or even three weeks ago. Responses across the country were uneven, some places enacted strict measures early, other places lagged either hoping for the best or operating on bad information coming from our nation's leaders (i.e., Donald Fuckhead Trump).

I would say that this past weekend is when most of the country finally got serious about isolating from one another. That means we're on course for more and more bad news until April 20, at least. If things continue to get measurably worse after April 20, we'll need to recalibrate estimates. But if the rate of new infections slows after April 20, we will still have another month or more before life begins to get back to a semblance of normal.

 

HotTeaBag

(1,206 posts)
3. Fantastic news !!!
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 11:24 AM
Mar 2020

But you're absolutely right, it's really hard to believe that we can't get this done more quickly.

From the timeline you laid out from test to results, it's almost as if a test will be irrelevant - people will start getting sick and need hospitalization before they can even find out if they have it.

patricia92243

(12,598 posts)
5. Lets me know that the figures they are quoting are seriously
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 11:29 AM
Mar 2020

wrong. Wonder how many people would not stay at home until they get results - much less after they have a negative test.

mitch96

(13,923 posts)
6. I always thought it strange everybody yelling about testing.. What about "resuting"?
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 11:55 AM
Mar 2020

Great you got the test and the results take forever.. Just heard Abbot Labs just came out with a quicky test. Lets hope it's reliable..
m

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
7. Abbott Laboratories has developed new 5-13 minute test
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 11:58 AM
Mar 2020
Abbott Laboratories announced Friday that the north suburban health care company is launching a new molecular coronavirus test that can produce results in as little as five minutes, the fastest turnaround time available.

The test will run on a lightweight and portable device — about the size of a toaster — designed to be deployed where testing is most needed, such as drive-thru screening sites or airports, the company said in a news release. Abbott plans to make the new test available next week and “expects to ramp up manufacturing to deliver 50,000 tests per day,” the news release said.The test can indicate a positive case in as little as five minutes and a negative case in 13 minutes, according to the Lake Bluff-based company.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued “emergency use authorization” for the test; this was the second coronavirus test designed by Abbott to receive this federal authorization, the company said.
”The COVID-19 pandemic will be fought on multiple fronts, and a portable molecular test that offers results in minutes adds to the broad range of diagnostic solutions needed to combat this virus," said Robert Ford, Abbott president and COO, in the news release.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/coronavirus/ct-coronavirus-abbott-new-fast-test-20200328-e3zv2relprdxnc2dveduytsiga-story.html
 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
30. +1000
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 06:02 PM
Mar 2020

This is great news. Such a long turnaround time seems almost pointless, since it would be very easy to get infected in between testing and final results.

0rganism

(23,962 posts)
12. unfortunately, it took 2 weeks, and now you need to be tested again
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 12:49 PM
Mar 2020

as you may have contracted it while awaiting your previous results

patricia92243

(12,598 posts)
24. Actually, I'm still sick - no fever now but still the cough and runny
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 02:09 PM
Mar 2020

nose. I am still so weak that if I really did get it, I wouldn't make it. My lungs just can't take any more.

SunSeeker

(51,646 posts)
15. There is a 40% false negative from the tests. My friend learned the hard way.
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 01:11 PM
Mar 2020

When her son's college closed down due to the virus (our whole state did--we're in CA) she drove to the college to drive him home and found that he was ill with flu-like symptoms. She tried to get him tested but her doctor said he did not meet the criteria. And then she got sick. They tested her and it took 8 days to get the results, which were negative. Then her daughter (who is in her 20s and sheltering in place with her) got sick, even sicker than her, and had trouble breathing. She took her daughter to the hospital and it was a horrifying experience. The hospital was overwhelmed and they would not let her stay with her daughter. The ER doctors did not bother with a test.  They diagnosed COVID-19 without testing for it "because it would not effect the way they treated her."  They simply x-rayed her lungs and saw the tell-tale signs.

Rorey

(8,445 posts)
26. That's what I've been wondering about "false negatives"
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 04:28 PM
Mar 2020

I don't know why everyone seems to think these tests are always accurate.

Lonestarblue

(10,044 posts)
16. What good news!
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 01:16 PM
Mar 2020

I think almost all of us feel we’re in quarantine these days. I go to the grocery and that’s it. I don’t even go to the gas station much because I’m using so little gas. I’m even considering finally reading War and Peace to occupy my time!😀

Mr.Bill

(24,312 posts)
17. I have a relative who was tested
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 01:31 PM
Mar 2020

and waited eight days for the results. The problem with that is it's like telling you "Congratulations you don't have the virus. At least you didn't eight days ago, anyway."

rickford66

(5,528 posts)
18. I had a fever at the end of February before the wide area warnings.
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 01:37 PM
Mar 2020

Lasted two days and I thought it was was one of my regular sinus infections, but I didn't have any draining as usual. A friend I had lunch with two days later, developed severe symptoms few days after lunch like the virus and went to his clinic. He was swabbed and sent home. Stayed home and I delivered food to him. He never was advised about his test. Will I ever be allowed to get a test? Probably not. Will I ever get an antibody test ? Probably not. I did come in contact with two recent arrivals from China at the end of January. The lady hugged me and my son. Probably too long between that and my fever though. I'm sure there's many unknowns like my situation. I've been staying in and waiting.

Raftergirl

(1,292 posts)
22. My sister had to be tested last week
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 01:59 PM
Mar 2020

as she was exposed to a person who tested positive. It only took 24 hours for her to get her result. She tested negative. She had been self quarantined for about 10 days to wait for the other person’s result and then to get her test. This was in Connecticut.

Mister Ed

(5,943 posts)
23. Thank heaven! Now the steps you took to protect others from you can also protect you from them.
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 02:01 PM
Mar 2020

All of us should continue to take those steps, as much as we possibly can. The best way for us to protect our health care workers is to keep protecting ourselves.

dickthegrouch

(3,183 posts)
25. Sorry to rain on your parade
Mon Mar 30, 2020, 04:22 PM
Mar 2020

But all the result means is that you didn’t have it on March 17th.
It is entirely possible you’ve contracted it since.

I really hope you didn’t, but let’s be real here.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I was tested for the viru...