Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAn appeal court let Texas keep its "abortions are not essentials."
Is this an appeal court now loaded with the new judges that McGahn brought and the turtle confirmed?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 496 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An appeal court let Texas keep its "abortions are not essentials." (Original Post)
question everything
Apr 2020
OP
MLAA
(17,327 posts)1. Fuck, so women have to risk their health and travel to another state
I hate Republicans
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,895 posts)2. I'm guessing that none of those judges have ever been pregnant.
Sgent
(5,857 posts)4. I don't know who sat on this case
but at least one member of the court who would probably agree with the opinion has a bunch of kids -- former long time attorney for the Archdiocese of New Orleans. She doesn't believe in birth control either.
Thanks Trump.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,895 posts)5. Sigh.
UTUSN
(70,740 posts)3. K&R
question everything
(47,534 posts)6. Kick for Wednesday