General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDr. Anthony Fauci Shuts Down Laura Ingraham's 'Misleading' Coronavirus Claim
The idea that we are definitely going to have a vaccine, we didnt really approach much else in the same way as we are pegging going back to normal with a vaccine. Did we? Ingraham asked.
Fauci, who has worked on responses on epidemics for several presidents, took umbrage with the comparison, telling the host the coronavirus was a different beast entirely and was unprecedented in its rate of transmission.
We dont have a vaccine for HIV/AIDS, but we have spectacularly effective treatment, he said. People who invariably would have died years ago right now are leading essentially normal lives. SARS is a different story. SARS disappeared.
snip===================================================================
Ingraham continued to press Fauci about SARS, asking if that disease disappeared, this could as well, correct?
You know, anything could, Laura, but I have to tell you the degree of efficiency of transmissibility of this is really unprecedented in anything that Ive seen, he said. Its an extraordinarily efficient virus in transmitting from one person to another.
Those kind of viruses dont just disappear.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fauci-laura-ingraham-coronavirus-comparisons-covid-19_n_5e992895c5b6ead1400a6b31
dem4decades
(11,304 posts)lapucelle
(18,319 posts)If he were overly combative, the Fox audience would probably just shut him off. I think he'd rather have them listening.
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)If he slams her, Trump will likely either be watching it live or will hear soon afterwards
malaise
(269,157 posts)He shut her down alright
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Excellent. As for calling out her lies directly, he'd never have another chance at her audience.
GreenPartyVoter
(72,381 posts)with minimal positive results.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,036 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(4,473 posts)Efficient ones stay and kill people. Lots of people.
Think of it as a Reverse Trump. Despite his utter incompetence, he persists.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,036 posts)If a virus is not infectious enough, it dies out. SARS and MERS were more deadly but not as infectious. If the virus kills its host too quidkly, it doesn't get as much chance to infect.
Flu is very infectious, but not very deadly.
bucolic_frolic
(43,286 posts)One is universally transmissible, the other required specific behavior. HIV is not something you could get by walking in crowds. Ignorant woman should know that, as most of the public does.
Yavin4
(35,445 posts)their agenda. They play on ignorance and prejudices to get the masses to support their desire to re-open businesses and return to normal.
IronLionZion
(45,528 posts)and encourage people to use blatantly false RW blogs and youtube opinion videos as evidence to promote their simply dead wrong narratives. It's dangerous and stupid
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)"Those kind of viruses don't just disappear."
Trump said it would disappear like magic.
usaf-vet
(6,207 posts)Thank you, Dr. Fauci, for bring knowledge to the discussion. I'm sorry you have to repeatedly deal with morons.
iluvtennis
(19,871 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,289 posts)It seems to me she's saying that (1) We're talking about COVID-19 as if we're going to find a vaccine and POOF, everything will go back to normal; and (2) We didn't say the same thing about other viruses, including SARS (which is, after all, another coronavirus).
So it sounds like she's raising doubts about the scenario, and suggesting that things aren't going to be resolved so cleanly or easily. Interestingly, that doesn't jibe with RW talking points very well. Maybe she's actually had an insight for once. Broken clocks and all ...
llmart
(15,552 posts)I had to read her gibberish question twice and still I didn't understand wtf she was asking.
She doesn't even have basic communication skills but heck, I guess they're good enough for FAUX news.