Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

USALiberal

(10,877 posts)
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 07:50 PM Apr 2020

What am I missing? IMHE (University of Washington) Predicts 72,433 total deaths on August 4th 2020

https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-states-of-america

3rd Graph

Total deaths
72,433
COVID-19 deaths projected by August 4, 2020

There are 63,800 now (WorldoMeters.com)

So they predict only 8,600 more deaths in the next 95 days. So an average of 90 more per day!

These people are much smarter than me so I am confused!



50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What am I missing? IMHE (University of Washington) Predicts 72,433 total deaths on August 4th 2020 (Original Post) USALiberal Apr 2020 OP
They have mathematical models and feed data into them, and get the answers Steelrolled Apr 2020 #1
I'd say 2. They have no idea how people are going to act bullimiami Apr 2020 #6
You are right... assumption on how people conform to Laura PourMeADrink May 2020 #42
We'll Call It A 1.2 ProfessorGAC Apr 2020 #7
What counts is Excess Deaths, not lies like Florida under-count by policy. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2020 #12
Some States Are Better Than Others ProfessorGAC Apr 2020 #20
The lower value of their range is 59,343 muriel_volestrangler May 2020 #46
Reinforces My Point ProfessorGAC May 2020 #48
The models are crapshoots Is that one still current? gibraltar72 Apr 2020 #2
Link is as of today. nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #3
I wonder if they were modeling social distancing. I've seen various scenarios. We're going gibraltar72 Apr 2020 #5
LOL, both of us!! nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #8
They Moved It Up Because Of Early Reopenings ProfessorGAC Apr 2020 #9
We'll be lucky if there aren't 30,000 more deaths in May alone greenjar_01 Apr 2020 #14
No Argument From Me ProfessorGAC Apr 2020 #18
They didn't check the "insane President" box in the settings rickford66 Apr 2020 #4
Yep. Blue_true Apr 2020 #34
yes NewJeffCT May 2020 #37
+1, it even that has multiple levels uponit7771 May 2020 #43
it's a prediction and nothing more than that beachbumbob Apr 2020 #10
Good grief, that projection is clearly wrong! Buckeye_Democrat Apr 2020 #11
We'll be over 75,000 by the end of next week greenjar_01 Apr 2020 #13
There will be over 70,000 by next week this time n/t malaise Apr 2020 #15
I agree! nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #16
Here's another model ramblin_dave Apr 2020 #17
Thanks for the link! nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #19
1.1 MILLION DEAD without current interventions? Fiendish Thingy Apr 2020 #22
I'm in Iowa. IHME model says 300 dead. This one suggests 10,000+. Someone is going to bullwinkle428 Apr 2020 #31
Their model may be assuming stay home restrictions remain in effect and are followed nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 2020 #21
something to consider about model predictions mike_c Apr 2020 #23
Interesting! Thanks for the info! nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #24
We will reach that number before May 15. MineralMan Apr 2020 #25
The IHME model is crap. Always has been, always will be. Epidemiologists are on Squinch Apr 2020 #26
A week ago they were predicting 60,000 deaths by that date. Crunchy Frog Apr 2020 #27
Next week they'll "revise" it again D_Master81 Apr 2020 #28
They are projecting no new deaths after July 6. Ms. Toad Apr 2020 #29
And very few in June. Nt USALiberal Apr 2020 #30
The first wave BGBD Apr 2020 #32
Seems like they have been consistently way off. Blue_true Apr 2020 #33
Seems like a non-sense estimate to me. Will probably be over twice that. mackdaddy May 2020 #35
You are correct! nt USALiberal May 2020 #36
You are correct! Nt USALiberal May 2020 #38
Snarky.... Might be true if every Gov. stops reporting like FL is now? Brainfodder May 2020 #39
90-100 thousand. sarcasmo May 2020 #40
i believe that is the group that was saying about 60k two weeks ago......... Takket May 2020 #41
That Prediction, Sir The Magistrate May 2020 #44
No, it's their mean prediction after April 27th, with current conditions muriel_volestrangler May 2020 #45
Then They Fucked Up, Sir The Magistrate May 2020 #47
Biden and all the other Democrats need to start focusing on excess deaths and all-out accuse Trump Celerity May 2020 #49
CDC is actually using Carnegie-Mellon's model DeminPennswoods May 2020 #50
 

Steelrolled

(2,022 posts)
1. They have mathematical models and feed data into them, and get the answers
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 07:52 PM
Apr 2020

So either
1. Their models are not accurate
2. The data is bad

I'd say it mostly is 1.

bullimiami

(13,101 posts)
6. I'd say 2. They have no idea how people are going to act
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 08:01 PM
Apr 2020

And it’s constantly changing.
Small changes in the transmission rate yield wild swings in case numbers.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
42. You are right... assumption on how people conform to
Fri May 1, 2020, 03:26 PM
May 2020

mitigation tactics. Which I would assume will be " not at all" by Aug. Not with a "leader" who doesn't care about human life. Sadly

ProfessorGAC

(65,136 posts)
7. We'll Call It A 1.2
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 08:02 PM
Apr 2020

The data is bad, but death data is fairly concrete. I know they still test, but dead is dead.
So, I think they've got some pretty shaky assumptions as the basis of their models.
The downgraded the estimate 3 times, now pushed it back up twice.
And(!), the number they keep reporting is the bottom of the prediction range. They should be touting the whole range. The upper value of the range for August 1, is 114,000.
So, their model really is 93,000+/-20,000.

ProfessorGAC

(65,136 posts)
20. Some States Are Better Than Others
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 08:25 PM
Apr 2020

No doubt there's cheating on the numbers in some states.
I have no reason to doubt IL, NY, NJ, or CA. Even Ohio seems on the up & up, and Michigan is too awful for suppression. If one was going to lie with the numbers, they would have done better than the bad reports their issuing.
I do like the unexpected death rate comparison. Not as a sole value, but as a good pressure test of other projections.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,348 posts)
46. The lower value of their range is 59,343
Fri May 1, 2020, 07:23 PM
May 2020

So that would be "86,800 +/- 27,400" or so. Something in the model says it's more likely to be in the lower part of the range; the 73,000 must be a mean, median or mode of their predictions.

ProfessorGAC

(65,136 posts)
48. Reinforces My Point
Sat May 2, 2020, 07:00 AM
May 2020

Take a look at their model graph. The median line, and bottom of range are zero slope from late May to early August.
But, the upper range still has an upward slope. The middle of the shaded are is 90k.
So they also have an imbalanced +/-. Versus the projection line, the plus is bigger than the minus.
There are some questionable assumptions.

gibraltar72

(7,508 posts)
5. I wonder if they were modeling social distancing. I've seen various scenarios. We're going
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 08:01 PM
Apr 2020

over 2,000 again today. I don't see how it's possible. But I'm just a dummy.

ProfessorGAC

(65,136 posts)
9. They Moved It Up Because Of Early Reopenings
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 08:06 PM
Apr 2020

Guy from IHME was on CNN yesterday. They raised it by over 6,000 by August because of that.
Also, I just looked at their graph.
First, their low value for today is already almost 3,000 below actual.
The upper end in August is 114,000. The midpoint is around 93,000.
So, they really seemed to be projecting 30,000 more deaths in May-July.

ProfessorGAC

(65,136 posts)
18. No Argument From Me
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 08:21 PM
Apr 2020

I still find their model suspect, but I am more annoyed by their insistence of publicizing the best case number only.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
37. yes
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:52 AM
May 2020

the Maryland governor called out the national guard to protect the tests coming in from South Korea because he feared they would be seized by the federal government

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,856 posts)
11. Good grief, that projection is clearly wrong!
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 08:14 PM
Apr 2020

It can’t be blamed on just bad data or bad assumptions.

If that’s IMHE’s current projection for August, then they should have the good sense to not publish the nonsense and to keep working on the model in the meantime!

ramblin_dave

(1,546 posts)
17. Here's another model
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 08:20 PM
Apr 2020
COVID-19 Simulator

The default simulation is for maintaining the current interventions for the next 4 months. That shows a death toll of 86,000 by August 31, which seems more realistic.

However, many states are starting to relax interventions. By setting the simulator to show the current interventions for the next 4 weeks, followed by minimal restrictions for 12 weeks, then re-analyzing, a death toll of around 1,100,000 is predicted by August 31.

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
31. I'm in Iowa. IHME model says 300 dead. This one suggests 10,000+. Someone is going to
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 11:34 PM
Apr 2020

have egg on their face at the end of this!

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
23. something to consider about model predictions
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 08:42 PM
Apr 2020

Up front let me say that I'm not an epidemiologist but I am a scientist who has spent many years modeling nature. Broadly speaking there are two general types of models. Conceptual models depict natural processes and are generally used to test our understanding about them. They are not meant to make accurate predictions about future events. The specific numbers they spit out are rarely accurate, if ever. No one really expects them to be accurate predictors. Rather, they articulate our assumptions and broad understanding of natural processes, such as how populations grow or how diseases propagate within our communities.

The second class of models is statistical. Statistical models are intended to make accurate predictions about future events, however they provide little or no understanding of the biological processes that underlay the data. A basic statistical model says "If the independent variable ranges from x1 to x2, then the dependent variable will likely (we think) range from y1 to y2," and we can know how confident we can be in those predictions. Statistical models are constructed after the fact, i.e. after we acquire sufficient data for analysis. It's also worth noting that statistical models become increasingly shaky when we use them to extrapolate beyond the observed data.

In the present case we still don't know much about this coronavirus' pathogenicity or its epidemiology, so we're trying to make informed decisions based largely on conceptual models of viral transmission and virulence. People need to realize that if such a model predicts X people will die today and Y people will die tomorrow, X+Y coffins is not likely to be the number needed, no matter what the model predicts.

Squinch

(50,990 posts)
26. The IHME model is crap. Always has been, always will be. Epidemiologists are on
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 09:23 PM
Apr 2020

record that it's crap.

It ALWAYS drastically under-predicts. That is why Donnie Bodybags loves it.

Crunchy Frog

(26,610 posts)
27. A week ago they were predicting 60,000 deaths by that date.
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 09:43 PM
Apr 2020

I think they're pretty much worthless.

They seem to have a built in assumption that deaths will precipitously drop to almost nothing 2-3 weeks after the date of their prediction, and then stay that way through August.

D_Master81

(1,822 posts)
28. Next week they'll "revise" it again
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 10:25 PM
Apr 2020

They’ll say there’s some new data and revise it up another 10,000.

 

BGBD

(3,282 posts)
32. The first wave
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 11:48 PM
Apr 2020

Is going to kill at least 100k people and that's with the massive stay at home and social distancing we have done.

This rush to "reopen" might push that number up drastically.

We shouldn't have been worried about when we could reopen, but how.

We either needed to fundamentally change the way we approach business and how things are done, or invest heavily in the trype fo infrastructure that we would need to ensure safety for people returning. We did neither.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
33. Seems like they have been consistently way off.
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 11:51 PM
Apr 2020

So, at least they are staying consistent. My guess is we hit their new number by this time next week.

mackdaddy

(1,528 posts)
35. Seems like a non-sense estimate to me. Will probably be over twice that.
Fri May 1, 2020, 12:14 AM
May 2020

First, I have seen discussion where the cases graph has the sharp jump up front, but stays at or near the peak with a slow decline down. They are showing a sharp sudden drop off.

We are now well over 2000 new deaths per day and seem pretty steady at that.

We are only testing seriously ill new patients, and have stalled at only 250k tests per day. Hopefully that will increase.

We have 60k dead for 1 million confirmed cases so about a 6% death rate for confirmed cases.

New cases today were just over 30 thousand. It takes about 3-4 weeks from test to death for the terminal cases.
Assuming the same death rate that is still 6%, then 1800 deaths per day at the end of this month.

At that rate we could easily have 50 to 60 thousand ADDITIONAL deaths just the month of May from already detected confirmed cases.

With all of the Stay Home orders loosening, there is a good chance that the new cases per day will go UP, not down.

I hope I am wrong. Please point out anything I am missing here.

Brainfodder

(6,423 posts)
39. Snarky.... Might be true if every Gov. stops reporting like FL is now?
Fri May 1, 2020, 03:21 PM
May 2020

Otherwise, they should be shamed for that easily surpassed # especially with fools partially opening back up way too soon?

Takket

(21,609 posts)
41. i believe that is the group that was saying about 60k two weeks ago.........
Fri May 1, 2020, 03:23 PM
May 2020

their data/methodology is obviously flawed because their predictions don't even pass the "eyeball" test for any person looknig at a graph. i would consider them to be an unreliable source.

The Magistrate

(95,250 posts)
44. That Prediction, Sir
Fri May 1, 2020, 03:29 PM
May 2020

Was the best case out of a wide range, and the whole was based on the assumption everything would be done right, in accordance with the best practices urged by experts in public health. Since there is much being done contrary to such recommendations, and best case projections, as Mr. Murphy has warned us, seldom work out anyway, the thing looks ridiculous, and rightly so.


"Optimists meet bitter disappointments. Pessimists get a pleasant surprise now and then."


muriel_volestrangler

(101,348 posts)
45. No, it's their mean prediction after April 27th, with current conditions
Fri May 1, 2020, 07:12 PM
May 2020

and their "best case" is 59,343. The figure they had on April 27th for deaths that had already happened was 55,891; so their best case was just 3,452 more deaths in over 3 months.

(Worldometer's 27th April figure was 56,795; April 28th was 59,265, so 2,470 in one day. There may be a certain amount of smoothing involved that explains the discrepancies, but, by any rational expectation, the best case figure for future deaths was about 2 days in the real world.)

A glance at the 7 day averages for New York state and the rest of the USA suggests a good outcome for the next week would be an average 250 deaths a day in NY, and 1,300 in the rest - over 10,000 in total. https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=13375993

That'll be about 76,000. Their model is ridiculous, and they should withdraw it, rather than plugging a few new numbers into it every so often, and acting as if it helps.

Celerity

(43,477 posts)
49. Biden and all the other Democrats need to start focusing on excess deaths and all-out accuse Trump
Sat May 2, 2020, 07:08 AM
May 2020

and his legions of MAGAT goons of a massive coverup.

The bottom line is Trump and his allies both in and out of the government are total suppressing the case and death numbers. Fux News is near the top of non-governmental gaslighters on thsi, and have the blood of tens of thousands on their hands, along with Trump himself.

HAMMER that home 24-7, from now until the election.

It simply MUST start happening.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What am I missing? IMHE (...