Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DIVINEprividence

(443 posts)
Fri May 1, 2020, 07:08 AM May 2020

Feminists need to forcefully denounce Tara Reade

She is clearly a lying con artist and scammer as the link below demonstrates in great detail with credible documentation. Feminists need to forcefully denounce and condemn her. Scammers like her not only victimize the innocent they falsely accuse but victimize all women who are true victims of rape, sexual assault and discrimination. This must be condemned.

http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Feminists need to forcefully denounce Tara Reade (Original Post) DIVINEprividence May 2020 OP
Time better spent pointing out Trump's transgressions delisen May 2020 #1
Unnnn, Reades changing story and flakiness makes her suspicious not a changing name. I think the ful uponit7771 May 2020 #2
K&R betsuni May 2020 #3

delisen

(6,044 posts)
1. Time better spent pointing out Trump's transgressions
Fri May 1, 2020, 07:55 AM
May 2020

That site suggests that a woman is suspicious if she has used more than one legal name in a lifetime.
Millions of women alive today have used different names throughout their lives.

I think facts are useful in evaluating a personal report but there is so much spin in that report and emotional button-pushing and conjecture.

I do not think being in debt to a predator bank is a sign a person is a liar or a con nor is filing for bankruptcy

I don't think this type of attack helps a dem candidate and I think Biden can defend himself adequately without it.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
2. Unnnn, Reades changing story and flakiness makes her suspicious not a changing name. I think the ful
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:01 AM
May 2020
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Feminists need to forcefu...