Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shockey80

(4,379 posts)
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:28 AM May 2020

Why didn't this woman accusing Biden come forward while he was vice president?

I call bullshit. The assault wasn't serious enough to report when Biden was vice president? It only became serious enough to report when he decided to run for president? This women is probably a closet Trump lover.

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why didn't this woman accusing Biden come forward while he was vice president? (Original Post) shockey80 May 2020 OP
If you think that Obama was not aware of this while vetting Zoonart May 2020 #1
This! n/t MFGsunny May 2020 #3
+1000 scrabblequeen40 May 2020 #5
Excellent point! KewlKat May 2020 #36
+1 dalton99a May 2020 #48
The obvious question... Maxheader May 2020 #2
Why not earlier? Because she came up with it in 2019/2020 Hav May 2020 #4
I didn't know she was a Bernie fanatic. shockey80 May 2020 #9
She has also lavished praise upon Vladimir Putin Tanuki May 2020 #19
You lose all credibility BGBD May 2020 #52
Yup. Her escalating claims against Biden coincide R B Garr May 2020 #43
It became worthy of reporting when Biden had Cha May 2020 #6
Bingo, Cha! Her accusations seem to change with every R B Garr May 2020 #12
You, too, RB! Cha May 2020 #14
My humble suggestion for a read... fleabiscuit May 2020 #50
Mahalo for the article, flea.. good job by Tommy Christopher.. Cha May 2020 #51
Yeah, I'm going to stick with Obama's vetting. R B Garr May 2020 #7
Good points about the alleged complaint.. Cha May 2020 #15
When she finally came out with her "details"... 2naSalit May 2020 #8
Who's Ms Carroll? tia. I got suckered in with Hayes false equivalence reporting and now I'm pissed uponit7771 May 2020 #10
Here's her account of Trump assaulting her Bucky May 2020 #17
The lady whom MF45 raped in a dressing room 2naSalit May 2020 #21
Yes! Noticed that. Also, she had a huge tell when she R B Garr May 2020 #56
Three more swings/misses, that's two strikes. 2naSalit May 2020 #59
That's the first person I thought of, too. nt pnwmom May 2020 #57
Her medium post re putin UpInArms May 2020 #11
Women who've been abused sometimes take years to come forward Bucky May 2020 #13
No, it's a valid question. One is not entitled to the benefit of the doubt when alleging abuse. Nt FreepFryer May 2020 #18
"I believe her" doesn't mean you endorse every single accusation. Bucky May 2020 #23
Nope, an allegation of abuse does NOT automatically place one on the higher ground. FreepFryer May 2020 #33
Why did she make a cutesy Twitter comment about "timing" Crunchy Frog May 2020 #53
Thank you for this Blue_Adept May 2020 #20
I agree, we shouldn't go there Hav May 2020 #22
Believe women Chargedformula May 2020 #25
not how it works, but nice try DeterDeter May 2020 #27
That's not believe all women unconditionally, that's not good judgement. Reades story changed. uponit7771 May 2020 #28
Believe all? Liars included? Hav May 2020 #29
The Technical Term For That, Sir, Is Bullshit The Magistrate May 2020 #31
Welcome to DU! Dem2 May 2020 #32
+1 (Nt) FreepFryer May 2020 #34
No, it's not all or nothing. All women should be heard, but not all are going to be credible. ehrnst May 2020 #46
Welcome to Democratic Underground, and congratulations on your single post. Crunchy Frog May 2020 #54
That's an ignorant statement. Surely you don't believe/mean it. marble falls Jul 2023 #62
I have mixed feeling about this subject. SharonClark May 2020 #26
The duplicity is an interesting twist, though, considering R B Garr May 2020 #41
As I've said (maybe in another thread), she seems a troubled woman with a painful past Bucky May 2020 #44
I've not followed this that closely yet but was struck by R B Garr May 2020 #45
Biden didn't run in 2016 FakeNoose May 2020 #16
we should stay away from that question DeterDeter May 2020 #24
The Republican M.O. world wide wally May 2020 #30
Because Putin wasn't paying her to do so then? lagomorph777 May 2020 #35
+1 (nt) FreepFryer May 2020 #37
She didn't want to hurt Obama's chances Beringia May 2020 #38
She went out of her way to praise Biden. ehrnst May 2020 #47
Didn't he also run for President in 2008? Proud Liberal Dem May 2020 #39
Too bad we can't see her recent banking deposits. OAITW r.2.0 May 2020 #40
Kick mcar May 2020 #42
I agree with Joy Reid Gothmog May 2020 #49
Thank you @JoyAnnReid for being brave enough to say what is really going on Gothmog May 2020 #55
+++++, "try and circumvent democracy" R B Garr May 2020 #58
I suspect that without documentary evidence (and currently there is none), this will largely be OnDoutside May 2020 #60
Mika went through a recap of all the ins and outs of this Tara Reade/Joe Biden matter. Gothmog May 2020 #61

Zoonart

(11,869 posts)
1. If you think that Obama was not aware of this while vetting
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:33 AM
May 2020

Joe for the VP, you are kidding yourself. More than any candidate that ever ran for president, Obama knew that he would be held to an almost unimaginable standard of purity. If there were ANYTHING to this complaint at all, Joe would never have been Vice President.

Hav

(5,969 posts)
4. Why not earlier? Because she came up with it in 2019/2020
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:41 AM
May 2020

She isn't a Trump lover but a crazy Bernie fanatic. She got butthurt about Sanders losing and made up these serious charges after her initial claim of feeling uncomfortable because of shoulder touching didn't prevent Biden from entering the race.
She's mostly hurting all the serious, legitimate cases by muddying the waters with made up bs. The next discussion about claims against Trump, including those of a 13 year old will be brushed away with whataboutism about her.

Asking why she didn't come out earlier is kind of missing the point. She came out in 2019 which would be fine if she didn't present a completely different story that she's selling now.

 

shockey80

(4,379 posts)
9. I didn't know she was a Bernie fanatic.
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:49 AM
May 2020

I have not been following this closely because It never made any sense to me. The first time I heard about this I did not believe it, so I stopped paying attention to it.

Tanuki

(14,918 posts)
19. She has also lavished praise upon Vladimir Putin
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:04 AM
May 2020
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/3046962001

"...During 2017 when Reade was praising Biden, she was condemning Russian leader Vladimir Putin’s efforts to hijack American democracy in the 2016 election. This changed in November 2018, when Reade trashed the United States as a country of “hypocrisy and imperialism” and “not a democracy at all but a corporate autocracy.” 

Reade’s distaste for America closely tracked her new infatuation with Russia and Putin. She referred to Putin as a “genius” with an athletic prowess that “is intoxicating to American women.” Then there’s this gem: “President Putin has an alluring combination of strength with gentleness. His sensuous image projects his love for life, the embodiment of grace while facing adversity.”

In March 2019, Reade essentially dismissed the idea of Russian interference in the 2016 American presidential election as hype. She said she loved Russia and her Russian relatives — and "like most women across the world, I like President Putin … a lot, his shirt on or shirt off.” ...(more)



 

BGBD

(3,282 posts)
52. You lose all credibility
Sat May 2, 2020, 02:11 AM
May 2020

when you claim to be "progressive" and then start writing about how great the leader of the modern fascist global movement is. Putin is a far right-wing thug and he has done his level best to try to install like-minded people in governments worldwide. Look at the people he has backed.

Trump
La Pen
Modi
Bolsonaro
Assad

The list just goes on and on. He has backed right-wing proto-fascists who are in line with his own philosophies.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
12. Bingo, Cha! Her accusations seem to change with every
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:52 AM
May 2020

primary Biden crushes. She looks like the second string sent in after all the hair touching stories went nowhere. Now Tara’s story is going from harassment, to fingering to rape.

Good to see you, Cha!

fleabiscuit

(4,542 posts)
50. My humble suggestion for a read...
Sat May 2, 2020, 12:42 AM
May 2020
What’s Joe Biden Supposed to Do, Call His Accuser a Lying Dog-Faced Pony Soldier?

"Former Vice President Joe Biden is under rising pressure to respond directly to allegations made by a former Senate staffer, but given his position as the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, is there even a right way for him to deny this?

Tara Reade’s journey from 1990s Senate staffer to 2019 Joe Biden non-sexual touching accuser to March 2020 sexual assault accuser has been well-documented in multiple online and print publications over the past several weeks. Many see her escalation in March as an indication that Reade, a fervent supporter of Senator Bernie Sanders, fed the new allegation to several Bernie-friendly outlets in a last-ditch attempt to hobble Biden...."

https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/whats-joe-biden-supposed-to-do-call-his-accuser-a-lying-dog-faced-pony-soldier/

Cha

(297,289 posts)
51. Mahalo for the article, flea.. good job by Tommy Christopher..
Sat May 2, 2020, 01:22 AM
May 2020

It looks like Joe Biden did deny this in the most honorable way. Even when grilled with the same question repeatedly.

snips from you link..

But this week, the allegation made the species jump from Fox News to regular cable, and on Wednesday night, MSNBC’s Chris Hayes and feminist author Rebecca Traister, engaged in a one-sided and incomplete review of the allegations, in which they each suggested that Biden must respond directly to them.

Exactly "..one-sided.. " and everyone without an agenda saw it.

That book, published in 2010, was written well after Reade claims she was assaulted, but long before she publicly accused Biden of the assault or provided similar details. Now, it’s possible she never read her dad’s book, or that she told him about the assault and he decided to turn it into a hot encounter for his book. Those things are possible.

Too similar, in my book, along with all of Reade's lies and inconsistencies to be a coincidence.

StaySafe&Sane, flea

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
7. Yeah, I'm going to stick with Obama's vetting.
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:48 AM
May 2020

The fact that there is no record of her supposed formal complaint against Biden is a main key, especially since it’s been said that she kept records of her employment from the 90’s.

I have records of someone who screwed me over years ago —a female — as I knew if she was a crazy liar about me that she would be a crazy liar about someone else and I have proof. If Reade was so wronged, she would have kept that written record. As it turns out, I got a knock on the door from a private investigator about my crazy liar experience, and I was glad to help the PI out. I still follow that case and will help when necessary.

Not to mention, Reade’s supposed complaint about Biden would have been used by the GOP long ago. Obama’s team would have surely found it.

Cha

(297,289 posts)
15. Good points about the alleged complaint..
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:00 AM
May 2020

It would seem if you have your work records you would also have an important copy of complaint you filed that no one can find.

2naSalit

(86,646 posts)
8. When she finally came out with her "details"...
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:49 AM
May 2020

I noticed something like a screaming red flashing light with sound effects, the whole thing sounds exactly like the sexual assault reported by Ms. Carroll last year.

So, knowing how this gang of criminals don't have enough imagination to come up with anything original, think Melanoma's plagiarizing Michelle Obama's speech, and overall projection of personal ills onto opponents, this recital of an assault is what -45 did to E Jean Carroll, not what Joe Biden would have done.

Anybody else notice that?

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
10. Who's Ms Carroll? tia. I got suckered in with Hayes false equivalence reporting and now I'm pissed
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:52 AM
May 2020

... off at the #ButteryMales shit that the M$M is doing.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
56. Yes! Noticed that. Also, she had a huge tell when she
Mon May 4, 2020, 02:43 PM
May 2020

said she had to “digest” what Biden said to Mika before she could respond. Bull! She needed time to consult with others backing this. Look how another attack crew completely exposed themselves with their two accusations about Biden at dinners he never attended.

2naSalit

(86,646 posts)
59. Three more swings/misses, that's two strikes.
Mon May 4, 2020, 05:09 PM
May 2020

After Ukraine bungle and getting caught, now this, one more and there's no way he can damage Biden to the degree necessary to knock him out of a sure win.

They'll keep trying but one trick pony show doesn't hold the public's interest like he would need it to so I think there will be desperate attempts to harm the Biden ticket but so far, nothing is working because we've seen this act so many times before. We need a functioning government and we don't have that because of the orange anus... and everybody knows it whether in denial or not.

UpInArms

(51,284 posts)
11. Her medium post re putin
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:52 AM
May 2020
President Putin scares the power elite in America because he is a compassionate, caring, visionary leader. President Putin has higher approval ratings in America then the American President. President Putin is beloved by Russia and he not going anywhere. Instead of being ensnared in the recent political intrigues (and America is trying hard to set that trap). President Putin is keeping a calm focus on his own country’s development and future, without America.
To President Putin, I say keep your eyes to the beautiful future and maybe, just maybe America will come to see Russia as I do, with eyes of love. To all my Russian friends, happy holiday and Happy New Year.

Bucky

(54,020 posts)
13. Women who've been abused sometimes take years to come forward
Fri May 1, 2020, 08:52 AM
May 2020

She seems to be a troubled woman with a painful past. It's looking like her specific charges against Biden are not justified. But all of Brett Kavanaugh's accusers waited years till they came forward. At least a dozen Trump victims could have come forward during all the years he was making money and ratings on TV, and yet they didn't come forward.

The "So why didn't she speak up before now?" attack is blatantly misogynist and intentionally ignores the traumatic nature of this sort of crime.

Bucky

(54,020 posts)
23. "I believe her" doesn't mean you endorse every single accusation.
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:06 AM
May 2020

It means you give a fair listen to accusations of sexual harassment and assault that we know are prevalent by powerful men in society. It means you don't hand wave away accusations that are politically inconvenient with old saws like "Why did she wait so many years?" when you know exactly why women wait years before coming forward with stories of physical and sexual assaults.

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
33. Nope, an allegation of abuse does NOT automatically place one on the higher ground.
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:31 AM
May 2020

No one has a monopoly on abuse, and to insist that those questioning the veracity of what are increasingly non-credible claims are hurting the abused is manipulative and deceitful conduct that hurts the actual victims of abuse.

One can separate the veracity of the allegation from the nature of the allegation if one actually wants to uncover the truth.

Crunchy Frog

(26,587 posts)
53. Why did she make a cutesy Twitter comment about "timing"
Sat May 2, 2020, 02:23 AM
May 2020

and only came out with the accusation immediately after Biden effectively had the nomination wrapped up.

I can recall when I started seeing the first posts about it in the Primary forum, and I'm virtually certain that it was in the immediate aftermath of Super Tuesday.

That alone is enough to convince me that it's bogus crap.

Blue_Adept

(6,399 posts)
20. Thank you for this
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:05 AM
May 2020

We've seen people say the exact thing here many times over the years - when the person accused was a republican or some Hollywood person.

The "brain drain" of women on this site over the last five years has really turned this place in a bad direction once the feminism groups abandoned them.

Hav

(5,969 posts)
22. I agree, we shouldn't go there
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:06 AM
May 2020

Questioning the point of time when someone comes out is an unfair charge and the claim should be judged on its own.
We don't need to go there, it's a distraction and we open up ourselves to more attacks. We only need to let the record speak for itself and that is Reade saying one year ago that it wasn't sexual misconduct when she talked about shoulder touching and nothing else.

Chargedformula

(4 posts)
25. Believe women
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:09 AM
May 2020

Exactly, if you're going to believe women, believe ALL women. Not just pick and choose depending on who is being accused.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
28. That's not believe all women unconditionally, that's not good judgement. Reades story changed.
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:11 AM
May 2020

... multiple times and in these cases that's been under reported.

Hav

(5,969 posts)
29. Believe all? Liars included?
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:13 AM
May 2020

Charges like these should be taken seriously and investigated. But let's not pretend that it's either all claims are true or all claims are false. That's a false dichotomy.

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
31. The Technical Term For That, Sir, Is Bullshit
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:24 AM
May 2020

Well-meaning, good-hearted people who tend to the left need to learn not to allow their better natures to be taken advantage of by vicious scum on the right, and splinterest wreckers on the far left, who enlist them in their charges against figures of the center left, by exhorting them to 'be consistent' and telling them 'don't be hypocrites'. The proper response to attempts at this is a hearty "Fuck off! Nobody cares what a rancid piece of dogshit like you thinks!" Or words to that effect....

Only attack the enemy, the christo-fascist right.

Never, ever, attack people who are on your side.


If you want one quick reason why the right wing wields power well out of proportion to the popularity of its policies, it is that they adhere to this rule, and we on the left do not.


"Defeat of a dangerous enemy is something to be for."

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
46. No, it's not all or nothing. All women should be heard, but not all are going to be credible.
Fri May 1, 2020, 11:05 AM
May 2020

However, we don't seem to view women as human beings, do we? Just in terms of broad, sweeping generalizations because they are "all" one thing or the opposite. No nuance. For instance female candidates are "qualified" or they are "flawed," unlike men, who apparently can be both.

I look forward to the day when women are considered individuals, and one doesn's represent or speak for all women.


A woman who falsely claimed to The Washington Post that Roy Moore, the Republican U.S. Senate candidate in Alabama, impregnated her as a teenager appears to work with an organization that uses deceptive tactics to secretly record conversations in an effort to embarrass its targets.

In a series of interviews over two weeks, the woman shared a dramatic story about an alleged sexual relationship with Moore in 1992 that led to an abortion when she was 15. During the interviews, she repeatedly pressed Post reporters to give their opinions on the effects that her claims could have on Moore’s candidacy if she went public.

The Post did not publish an article based on her unsubstantiated account. When Post reporters confronted her with inconsistencies in her story and an Internet posting that raised doubts about her motivations, she insisted that she was not working with any organization that targets journalists.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/a-woman-approached-the-post-with-dramatic--and-false--tale-about-roy-moore-sje-appears-to-be-part-of-undercover-sting-operation/2017/11/27/0c2e335a-cfb6-11e7-9d3a-bcbe2af58c3a_story.html

SharonClark

(10,014 posts)
26. I have mixed feeling about this subject.
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:10 AM
May 2020

Yes, women may not process an assault for years but I feel they are often set up to lose on a national stage by ‘supporters’ who exploit them for potential political gain.

I also do not understand the blanket statement “believe women”. I’m a woman and active in the women’s movement my entire adult life but I’ve interacted with women who are frauds or mentally ill who harm others (intentionally or not) while trying to help themselves.

My bottom line has always been to give women the benefit of the doubt, listen to them, and then investigate before accusing anyone of anything.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
41. The duplicity is an interesting twist, though, considering
Fri May 1, 2020, 10:07 AM
May 2020

she praised Biden for his violence against women legislation, then accuses him of violence.

Bucky

(54,020 posts)
44. As I've said (maybe in another thread), she seems a troubled woman with a painful past
Fri May 1, 2020, 10:19 AM
May 2020

Given how handsy Biden has been in the past, it's not hard to imagine how a woman who has been betrayed by people with authority and power to misconstrue something and perhaps even garble or misproject the memory over time.

Sexual harassment sexual abuse are complicated and mentally abusive crimes. I have friends who have been victims of more than one predator, because predators can often identify easy targets. As Reade's large number of accusation show, she has that kind of trouble pass. I hope she gets the help and the healing that she needs, after this incident is out of the public eye

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
45. I've not followed this that closely yet but was struck by
Fri May 1, 2020, 10:26 AM
May 2020

a smirk on her face that wouldn’t seem to match the pain you are describing. I’ve come to understand she is a great fan of Putin, who murders all manner of folks who cross him, so again with the duplicity.

Now I’ve seen she is a Bernie supporter, so her delays in coming forward are also interesting timing. I saw a Tweet here that she deleted that referenced her interest in timing her accusations just right.

FakeNoose

(32,645 posts)
16. Biden didn't run in 2016
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:01 AM
May 2020

If he had run for President, some BS like this would have happened. But the Repukes were too busy trashing Hillary then, and they didn't have time to drag Joe through the mud.

After they gave up on trashing Biden's son (they were REALLY hoping for that one!) the Repukes are just getting so desperate. The deflection is ridiculous, because the Chump campaign is empty-handed now.

By the way, all they have is mud-slinging and it's going to get way worse by November. As much as I admire Elizabeth Warren, I didn't want to see her treated so shabbily the way they treated Hillary 4 years ago. I don't want to see a woman treated that way ever again. Hillary handled it well, but I hate witnessing how the Repukes treat women they consider a threat.

DeterDeter

(70 posts)
24. we should stay away from that question
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:09 AM
May 2020

People are allowed to come out with this kind of stuff in their own time. I personally don't believe her, and would focus more on 1.) She claimed that she made a formal complaint about harassment to the senate personnel office. The Times could not find record of this existing. This would mean that there would need to be a bi-partisan conspiracy to "disappear" this record that would have escaped VP vetting, which requires a huge leap of faith. This one might be complicated because I don't think people realize how rigorous the vetting for this type of position would require. 2.) She emphasized last year that the problem wasn't with Biden himself but with his staff, that she said that this was NOT a story about sexual misconduct. The public deserves to have this mentioned more, as this is not merely just "leaving stuff out".

world wide wally

(21,744 posts)
30. The Republican M.O.
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:18 AM
May 2020

With Kerry and Swift Boating, they just stuck with it for months until some shit finally stuck.
With Hillary, it was her emails. Same thing.
This is their Biden game plan now.
The only question is if Americans are stupid enough to fall for it again and the answer to that is frightening.

Beringia

(4,316 posts)
38. She didn't want to hurt Obama's chances
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:36 AM
May 2020

and she didn't want to cause social problems for her daughter who was in HS.

There are several articles about it, but DU calls them Russian rags I think.
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
47. She went out of her way to praise Biden.
Fri May 1, 2020, 01:43 PM
May 2020

She could have praised Obama without praising Biden. If your theory is correct, why do you think she did that?

There are several articles about it, but DU calls them Russian rags I think.


I'll bet you've read them all.

OAITW r.2.0

(24,504 posts)
40. Too bad we can't see her recent banking deposits.
Fri May 1, 2020, 09:51 AM
May 2020

I have no doubt that someone is paying her good money to trash Joe. I really doubt that this will sway any voters as a single unreported case does not begin to compare with the serial sex abuser-in-charge.

Isn't there a class-action type suit working its way through the Courts by dozens of women who have documented Trump's sexual assaults?

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
58. +++++, "try and circumvent democracy"
Mon May 4, 2020, 02:47 PM
May 2020

Joy hit the nail on the head! That’s exactly what is going on here.

Thanks for posting this, Goth.

OnDoutside

(19,962 posts)
60. I suspect that without documentary evidence (and currently there is none), this will largely be
Mon May 4, 2020, 06:44 PM
May 2020

sidelined, and like covid, reappear at regular intervals as the NJs on the right and the left manufacture "evidence". As of now, Reade's story is looking fractured at best, and a tissue of lies, used to try and take Biden down to get Sanders installed, at worst. Democratic operatives should be doing a way better job of bringing her many contradictions to air, far more than they are doing, so that this gets baked in as another attempted Biden Takedown ASAP.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why didn't this woman acc...