General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking news: Earthquake (5.5) hits Puerto Rico, damages buildings!
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/5-5-magnitude-earthquake-hits-near-puerto-rico-n11986115-magnitude earthquake hit near southern Puerto Rico on Saturday, jolting many from their beds on an island where some people still remain in shelters from previous quakes earlier this year. There were no immediate reports of casualties.
The U.S. Geological Survey said the quake hit just off the coast of Tallaboa, Peñuelas and was felt in nearby towns including Guánica and Guayanilla, where hundreds of homes were destroyed by a quake in early January that killed one person and caused hundreds of millions of dollars in damage.
Reports of damage were still trickling in early Saturday morning, with at least one second-story balcony crashing in the southern city of Ponce, spokeswoman Inés Rivera told The Associated Press. Meanwhile, cracks in homes were reported in Guayanilla.
Everything shook really hard, spokesman Danny Hernández said by phone.
Ponce Mayor María Meléndez tweeted images of the damages Saturday morning while also urging people to "avoid going to the city center until we make sure everyone is safe."
Turbineguy
(37,346 posts)do nothing.
spanone
(135,846 posts)abqtommy
(14,118 posts)jimfields33
(15,830 posts)Sounds like minimum damage and no casualties. Which is so great.
Response to mfcorey1 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)seems to be hitting Puerto Rico typically, lockdown extended to May. No one there has received a personal disaster relief check. Sounds typical for Trump spite.
Igel
(35,320 posts)They were federal employees and a few other small groups that qualified for getting money through the IRS disbursement system. Most PR residents don't pay the standard federal income tax.
The rest won't get any money directly through the IRS. It'll be routed--according to the legislation that Pelosi's House approved--through the PR Treasury.
The Treasury's been working out how to do this in a transparent and reasonable way. Last I heard was maybe 10 days ago, and the PR Treasury folk said they were answering the last questions and the money should be ready "soon". (Which is also what they were saying 20 days ago.)
Nobody said, as far as I know, what the issues were holding up the agreement. But articles from 3/27, before the legislation was even passed, said there'd need to be an agreement because of the then-bill's language.