ByeDon 2020!

They'll trot out another one

And another

And another

It was so fast it couldn't be stopped.

an active case against him where plaintiff, E. Jean Carroll, wants his DNA.

And with so many allegations, people will just have to assume it is true, right? Just like Al Franken all over again.

In a world where satire and irony died months ago, I'm waiting to hear that he's put Bill Barr on the case.

that

We will never know

Like Trump did his accusers and threatened to sue them all.

He has been above and beyond respectful toward her, it says a lot about how decent a person he is.

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

So many people willing to put their reputation on the line, for what? - A pos, or a piece of the pie...

Perhaps legal advice is to avoid public appearances because it's evidence in a defamation suit?
Just looking at possible reasons.

Her credibility is in tatters

http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

that Reade was going on another network for an interview..I have been waiting to see if Reade would cancel..

Perhaps C Hayes and A Vitali could now issue their apology for being two young twits pumping up a fabricated story...waiting..

Thanks for this DURHAM D

they probably expected him to act like drumpf....

It figures.

But she did.

She weaponized her accusation by waiting until it would hurt the most people, not just Biden, but you and me and the whole country.

And fuck her for that.

I am so mad and disgusted!

Honestly, I'm not surprised. Reade's claim is dubious at best.

Nyet!

Now she filed a complaint on a clip board in the cafeteria.

wrote it with lipstick on the mirror in the women's bathroom.

yeah, that's the ticket.

the only thing you write on clip boards in the cafe are things to drop in the suggestion box. She's full of shit.

Reade chickened out on a Fox interview, an opportunity to tell her story. Christine Blasey Ford appeared, under oath, before a hostile Senate Committee and answered every last question asked.

Can we draw any conclusions about the veracity of the two women?

No real traction so far, got to get this even more graphic................

She's had 27 years to get her story together, and now she's talking about her complaint being on a clipboard in the cafeteria?

It's probably not about Faux core viewers anyway. They'd believe years old stale crap and wouldn't vote for Biden if Trump sacrificed real infants to baal on national TV. I bet the checks from the Trump campaign have come to an abrupt halt as she's no longer reliable and they deemed her unable to sway middle of the road voters or cast any serious disparagement on Biden. She may be more of a liability now than an asset. Heck, she may have even threatened to blow the whole scheme if they didn't fund whatever her demands are. The possibilities are many.

But what we do know...she's backtracked on filing an official complaint and backtracked on the type of alleged encounter.

It's hard being so indecisive!

Link to tweet

If I'm interpreting the last sentence correctly.

I questioned this approach even then. And I despise Kavanaugh, but am not willing to sacrifice the bedrock of the presumption of innocence for cheap political again against anyone. Those spearheading the #metoo movement should have realized that careening from the horrible default position of disbelieving women to the, quite frankly, equally horrible default position of believing women would always end this way. It reminds me of the far, far-left types who doxx right-wingers while screaming about doxxing being bad when right-wingers do. You set the rules of engagement for your enemy when you set them for yourselves. #metoo should have always been about listening to alleged victims of assault, hearing them out, being compassionate, and then evaluating their story. That we set the standard as they are "automatically telling the truth," absolutely sets up. The article Scarborough links to is right. With the current standard, #metoo is little more than a hit squad when it should be representing a standard of protecting victims while also protecting the accused, as the latter is the very standard of innocent until proven guilty upon which our country is based.

Blasey Ford recalled what she could and didn't add to nor embellish on what she couldn't.

Blasey Ford was an imminently credible witness, in direct contrast with that sobbing, angry, lying mess that was Kavanaugh.

she's backtracking on filing an official complaint, since apparently none exists. Word is she's backtracking on what kind of contact she supposedly had with Biden as well. Two lies. Down in flames. 15 minutes of fame over in 3...2...1....


Oh, and those Donald J. Trump checks? Not worth the paper they're printed on. Sorry, Tara, but you've been rolled.

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Yes, yes she did

Trouble, Ms. Reade?

As soon as her story starts falling apart she immediately falls to to "I'm being attacked" or "I'm being threatened."

When asked why she didn't tell her assault story last year when she told her harassment story she said the reporter she was talking to was shutting her down. Please. This was a reporter who was actively looking for stories about Biden harassing people. I'm sure he would have just hated hearing an assault story.

As for the "reporters"...

Katie Halper, Ryan Grimm, Nathan Robinson, Glen Greenwald.....

they are all propagandists, not journalists.