Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

K8-EEE

(15,667 posts) Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:58 PM Sep 2012

If the embassy was attacked because "Obama's weak," does that mean Bush was 1000x weaker?

Don't know how they manage to do the "it's totally Obama's fault if 3 Americans get attacked in Libya," but 3,000 Americans dying in NYC is not weak...?

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If the embassy was attacked because "Obama's weak," does that mean Bush was 1000x weaker? (Original Post) K8-EEE Sep 2012 OP

No Indydem Sep 2012 #1

Oh right! And the bungled wars to get Saddam's "WMD" were Clinton's fault too.... K8-EEE Sep 2012 #2

Indydem

(2,642 posts)

1. No

Reply to K8-EEE (Original post)

Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:59 PM

Sep 2012

9/11 was because CLINTON was weak and Bin Laden believed the United States a "paper tiger."

Get your puke stories straight.

K8-EEE

(15,667 posts)

2. Oh right! And the bungled wars to get Saddam's "WMD" were Clinton's fault too....