Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWomens' support for Obama grows
Womens' support for Obama grows
by kos
For some bizarre reason, most pollsters don't include gender breakdowns in their crosstabs. Even CNN didn't publish those numbers in their latest poll, but I was able to cull the data after the womens' numbers were mentioned on the Ed Show.
The three national polls have trendlines, which I included in parenthesis. The older polls are all from the third week of August:
Fox News showed a huge jump in Pres. Barack Obama's lady support post-conventions, growing the gender gap from +14 to +20 despite gaining a couple of points among men. CNN's gap actually shrunknot because Obama lost support among women, but because he surged with men. And the more dudes agree with women that Obama's the right choice, the smaller the gap. Meanwhile, PPP's gap went from +4 to +10. Like CNN, PPP sees significantly higher support for Obama among men, so once again, the more they support Obama, the smaller the gap.
Thus, we want a smaller gap, with men and women deciding to meet in a neutral spot somewhere between Mars and Venus ... like, say, earth, and agreeing to jointly support Obama by big margins. But huge gap or not-so-huge gap, fact is that Obama leads Romney among women by double digits in every single one of these polls. Meanwhile, Mitt Romney can't muster double-digit leads with men in these critical battlegrounds.
And given that women vote in significantly higher numbers than men, that's the ballgame.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/14/1131657/-Women-support-for-Obama-grows
by kos
For some bizarre reason, most pollsters don't include gender breakdowns in their crosstabs. Even CNN didn't publish those numbers in their latest poll, but I was able to cull the data after the womens' numbers were mentioned on the Ed Show.
The three national polls have trendlines, which I included in parenthesis. The older polls are all from the third week of August:
Fox News showed a huge jump in Pres. Barack Obama's lady support post-conventions, growing the gender gap from +14 to +20 despite gaining a couple of points among men. CNN's gap actually shrunknot because Obama lost support among women, but because he surged with men. And the more dudes agree with women that Obama's the right choice, the smaller the gap. Meanwhile, PPP's gap went from +4 to +10. Like CNN, PPP sees significantly higher support for Obama among men, so once again, the more they support Obama, the smaller the gap.
Thus, we want a smaller gap, with men and women deciding to meet in a neutral spot somewhere between Mars and Venus ... like, say, earth, and agreeing to jointly support Obama by big margins. But huge gap or not-so-huge gap, fact is that Obama leads Romney among women by double digits in every single one of these polls. Meanwhile, Mitt Romney can't muster double-digit leads with men in these critical battlegrounds.
And given that women vote in significantly higher numbers than men, that's the ballgame.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/14/1131657/-Women-support-for-Obama-grows
Watch the polls.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021336015
Note:
Kos Media, LLC Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 992 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Womens' support for Obama grows (Original Post)
ProSense
Sep 2012
OP
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)1. Parading around Ann Romney
to get the female vote was a BIG mistake. She comes off as a snooty, rich woman who cannot possibly understand what the average woman is the US wants and needs.
I would rather have a Laura Bush than an Ann Romney (or the Palins, Backmans, etc.). Of course, none of them can hold a candle to MICHELLE!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. Idiot alert:
Michele Bachmann: War On Women As Real As Bill Clintons Arithmetic
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) kicked off her remarks at the Values Voter Summit in Washington Friday by pushing back on Democratic rhetoric aimed at the female electorate.
"Before I start I just want to say a word about this concept you have heard about called the war on women, the so-called war on women," Bachmann said. "And I just want to say I think it has as much reliability and truthfulness as Bill Clinton's arithmetic."
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/michele-bachmann-war-on-women-as-real-as
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) kicked off her remarks at the Values Voter Summit in Washington Friday by pushing back on Democratic rhetoric aimed at the female electorate.
"Before I start I just want to say a word about this concept you have heard about called the war on women, the so-called war on women," Bachmann said. "And I just want to say I think it has as much reliability and truthfulness as Bill Clinton's arithmetic."
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/michele-bachmann-war-on-women-as-real-as
Lucy Goosey
(2,940 posts)3. She's right, but not in the way she thinks she is
The GOP war on women is, in fact, as real as Bill Clinton's arithmetic. They're both real, Michele, you crazy eyed hack!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)4. Yeah, well
look who Republicans chose to lead their party.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021338307
Same logic!