Can't wait for a ruling

He used to hold court at the stadium during Eagles games to nail miscreants, or people who were termed miscreants by our "infalible" police and security guards. Talk about weird...he convened court and set bail and whatever...but he's right on the money on this one.

And any wordy from the others?

Judges sometimes do the right thing, because they feel they're not beyond party - and power.

Just a hair more hope that one of three Rs will have a conscience vs the mindless twit R who ruled on it the first go around.

But may be the swing vote in this case:

"As chief, he works hardest at ensuring people view the court with respect. “He’s well aware of the legacy that he wants to leave and is taking great steps to make this not a partisan court,” said West Chester lawyer Sam Stretton, who has argued cases before the high court.

The most obvious example: his recent vote to side with the three Democratic justices in overturning a plan to revamp the districts of state lawmakers. GOP lawmakers wrote that plan.

Generally, people say he tends to be pro-government in criminal justice matters that come before the court, and pro-individual rights in civil matters. Some commend him for writing searching opinions, and he is thought to be a judge who works through issues carefully."

http://www.pennlive.com/specialprojects/index.ssf/2012/08/profile_pennsylvania_supreme_c.html

Here's hoping...

so, the court has three Democrats and three repubs, so if the vote is three for and three against it will stand, so lets hope one of the repubs do the right thing!

We can *hope* she gets sent to prison though.