Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney foreign policy team "a neocon revival committee pushing for another war in the Middle East"
Think Progress: Romney Aligns Himself With Obama On Key Aspect Of Iran Policy
<...>
Romneys statement illustrates the confusion from Romneys team on Iran, and indeed on the Romney camps wider foreign policy. (Romneys foreign policy director would neither confirm nor deny that Romney is a neoconservative.) On one hand, the Romney campaign struggles to differentiate its Iran policy from President Obamas, and on the other, his team sounds more like a neocon revival committee pushing for another war in the Middle East.
The New York Times noticed this contradiction as well, reporting in an article on Friday that a senior foreign policy adviser to Romney said the former Massachusetts governor would not be content with an Iran one screwdrivers turn away from a nuclear weapon. But, the Times added, the adviser stopped short of saying exactly where, in the development of nuclear capability, Mr. Romney would draw the line.
President Obama has said that he wont allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon. The Obama administration is aware, not only of the threat an Iranian nuclear weapon poses, but also the potential negative consequences of a military attack on Iran, such as those outlined in a new bipartisan expert report released yesterday. And that, coupled with U.N., U.S. and Israeli assessments that Iran has not yet decided on whether to build a nuclear weapon, leads the administration to pursue a diplomatic solution with Iran, a track the it deems the best and most permanent way to solve the nuclear crisis.
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/09/14/849521/romney-iran-red-line-obama/
Romneys statement illustrates the confusion from Romneys team on Iran, and indeed on the Romney camps wider foreign policy. (Romneys foreign policy director would neither confirm nor deny that Romney is a neoconservative.) On one hand, the Romney campaign struggles to differentiate its Iran policy from President Obamas, and on the other, his team sounds more like a neocon revival committee pushing for another war in the Middle East.
The New York Times noticed this contradiction as well, reporting in an article on Friday that a senior foreign policy adviser to Romney said the former Massachusetts governor would not be content with an Iran one screwdrivers turn away from a nuclear weapon. But, the Times added, the adviser stopped short of saying exactly where, in the development of nuclear capability, Mr. Romney would draw the line.
President Obama has said that he wont allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon. The Obama administration is aware, not only of the threat an Iranian nuclear weapon poses, but also the potential negative consequences of a military attack on Iran, such as those outlined in a new bipartisan expert report released yesterday. And that, coupled with U.N., U.S. and Israeli assessments that Iran has not yet decided on whether to build a nuclear weapon, leads the administration to pursue a diplomatic solution with Iran, a track the it deems the best and most permanent way to solve the nuclear crisis.
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/09/14/849521/romney-iran-red-line-obama/
Steve Benen: Amateur hour continues, this time on Iran
<...>
...Romney's most senior foreign policy advisers, Eliot Cohen and Richard Williamson, said Romney and Obama don't have the same red line with regards to Iran.
There are 53 days left before the election, and Romney and Romney's advisors are not yet able to say the same thing on one of their key foreign-policy complaints about Obama. One of these days, amateur hour is going to have to end.
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2012/09/14/13864799-amateur-hour-continues-this-time-on-iran
...Romney's most senior foreign policy advisers, Eliot Cohen and Richard Williamson, said Romney and Obama don't have the same red line with regards to Iran.
Mr. Romney, said Mr. Cohen, "would not be content with an Iran one screwdriver's turn away from a nuclear weapon." Though he did not say exactly where, in the development of nuclear capacity, Mr. Romney would draw his own red line, Mr. Cohen said that it would be far before Mr. Obama's own line -- at the point of actual weaponization -- and that it could be in a different place that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel draws it.
There are 53 days left before the election, and Romney and Romney's advisors are not yet able to say the same thing on one of their key foreign-policy complaints about Obama. One of these days, amateur hour is going to have to end.
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2012/09/14/13864799-amateur-hour-continues-this-time-on-iran
Mitt is lying and being intentionally vague. His foreign policy is a revival of a neocon wet dream.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1351 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney foreign policy team "a neocon revival committee pushing for another war in the Middle East" (Original Post)
ProSense
Sep 2012
OP
ProSense
(116,464 posts)1. Kick! n/t
ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. Romney campaign quickly distances itself from Mitt's statement of support for Obama's Iran policy
Romney campaign quickly distances itself from Mitt's statement of support for Obama's Iran policy
<...>
Confused? Well, this doesn't clear it up:
They also said Stephanopoulos was wrong to say Obama's policy was the same as Romney's. Of course, Stephanopoulos wasn't the only one to make that "mistake." Mitt Romney did as well. Three different times.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/14/1131846/-Romney-campaign-quickly-distances-itself-from-Mitt-s-statement-of-support-for-Obama-s-Iran-policy
Confused? Well, this doesn't clear it up:
The Romney campaign did not offer an on-the-record response for the apparent discrepancy in message and position between Mr. Romney and his top foreign policy advisers. But they privately maintain there is no change in policy and point to the portion of the ABC News interview where he says that Iran should not have the capacity to terrorize the world.
They also said Stephanopoulos was wrong to say Obama's policy was the same as Romney's. Of course, Stephanopoulos wasn't the only one to make that "mistake." Mitt Romney did as well. Three different times.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/14/1131846/-Romney-campaign-quickly-distances-itself-from-Mitt-s-statement-of-support-for-Obama-s-Iran-policy
AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)3. Mormons have long been preparing for the "End Times" also...
in that sense, they are very similar to the Evangelicals.
doublethink
(6,823 posts)4. Gee how could that happen?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)5. Nice graphic. n/t
doublethink
(6,823 posts)6. Went right with your thread ...
one more rec here would help get it out there more ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021340411
ProSense
(116,464 posts)7. Anything for this
doublethink
(6,823 posts)8. LOL ... yeah that will always be a classic. :)